At a time when the government is eager to cut spending, their policy on universities, which will cost money not save it, can only be seen as ideological. The government will pay fees up front, with students indebted to the government for decades.
University funding hit the headlines again over the weekend, with Nick Clegg and Vince Cable insisting tuition fee increases will be capped – Clegg even suggesting his u-turn over his pledge to scrap fees “had to be done due to the financial situation the country was in”. Yet new research out today reveals the Browne Review, if implemented, would not ease this “situation” but instead end up costing government an additional £3 billion a year.
At a time when the government is eager to cut spending, their policy on universities, which will cost money not save it, can only be seen as ideological. The government will pay fees up front, with students indebted to the government for decades.
Left Foot Forward has already highlighted the unfairness of the propsals, which will result in bankers faring better than public servants such as teachers. The new revelations, however, show them not only to be unfair but proposals that will not reduce the deficit in the short-term, as Andrew Harding on the 2me2you blog shows:
|
Annual government spend on HE funding |
|
|
Current |
Browne |
| Core funding | £7,478,145,985.80 | £1,637,700,686 |
| Fees maintenance | £10,824,313,850.00 | £19,740,390,000.00 |
| Total (core + fees) | £18,302,459,835.80 | £21,378,090,686 |
|
Estimated additional cost to govt. of Browne model, for each academic year: £3,075,630,850.50 |
The blog cites the Higher Education Policy Institute in support and concludes:
“This analysis makes a mockery of any argument that could be made that suggests that reform of Higher Education funding is necessary or required by a need to save money. It does not save money – it costs money, which could be spent more fairly on increasing the core teaching resource.
“This analysis suggests that Vince Cable has lied to parliament, to the press and to his own party.
“And this analysis casts doubt on the commitment of the coalition to their own stated aim of deficit reduction. This reform is clearly a purely ideological move, attempting to reform Higher Education along market-driven lines with no proven benefits and several clear issues, not least the additional costs to young people.
“And can we really afford it? Apparently so.”
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
23 Responses to “Ideological Browne review will end up costing taxpayer more”
John Ruddy
RT @leftfootfwd: Lib Dem U-Turn on tuition fees actually ends up costing Government more http://bit.ly/clmCzR Increases deficit
yorkierosie
RT @jruddy99: RT @leftfootfwd: Lib Dem U-Turn on tuition fees actually ends up costing Government more http://bit.ly/clmCzR Increases de …
Keith White
RT @jruddy99: RT @leftfootfwd: Lib Dem U-Turn on tuition fees actually ends up costing Government more http://bit.ly/clmCzR Increases de …
evidence based? really?
Wrong. Whilst its true that a 3bill cost is incured as a result of Browne. The risiing value of students loans yields 9billion- net costs being admonished as the government is taking on an asset. Granted, that relies on a series of assumptions, but frankly so does your model- you’ve just decided its doesn’t fit your argument to include them.
tehdai
9bn before 2015? No? Well, it’s nothing to do with deficit reduction, then.