Green’s appointment as ‘cuts Tsar’ drives Cable closer to resignation

One could be forgiven for checking that yesterday wasn’t April 1st after waking up to the news that private equity tycoon and asset-stripper extraordinaire Philip Green has been appointed by David Cameron to head a Whitehall spending review.

One could be forgiven for checking that yesterday wasn’t April 1st after waking up to the news that private equity tycoon and asset-stripper extraordinaire Philip Green has been appointed by David Cameron to head a Whitehall spending review. Green’s role will, ostensibly, be to identify inefficiencies and savings in government departments. In reality, Green will probably look to do to government what he has done to so many of the companies he has bought and sold – slash and burn.

Green is the multi-billionaire owner of the clothing retailer Arcadia, which includes Topshop and Dorothy Perkins. However, while he may be one of Britain’s most successful entrepreneurs, owning an estimated 12% per cent of Britain’s high-street shops, his billions are the result of massive tax avoidance.

Ninety two per cent of Arcadia group is owned by Green’s wife, Tina, for tax purposes. Green spends most of his time in Monaco, a tax haven, and in 2005 his company paid a £1.2 billion dividend to Tina Green. The Treasury did not receive a penny because she is a Monaco resident.

Of course, despite being morally repugnant, tax evasion the Green way is not illegal. But, as Will Straw points out in the Guardian, ‘it is certainly a poor qualification for heading up a Whitehall “external efficiency review”’.

In 2006, the BBC’s Money Programme reported that Green and his family had saved themselves nearly £300 million the previous year by living partly in Monaco. Green has at least acknowledged that his family does not live in Britain, although he claims that his family has paid capital gains and corporation tax of between £300-400m over the past five years in the UK, although this is still a very small sum for a man estimated to be worth well over £4bn.

Few could deny that Green is a brilliantly skilled money-maker and Arcadia has recorded operating profits of between £250-300m in the last three years despite the downturn. But Green is also the Tories’ fourth so-called ‘government efficiency’ adviser after former BP boss Lord Browne was appointed in June “to improve efficiency in each department”, while Sir Peter Gershon and Dr Martin Read promised the Conservatives £12bn in efficiency savings before the election.

These conflicting egos, all doing the same job, are not likely to achieve anything.

Moreover, while it is unsurprising that the Lib-Con Government of millionaires should have appointed a billionaire to look for efficiency savings, the appointment is surely a PR disaster – for one thing Green is a forceful man with a shorter fuse than Colonel Gaddafi – and his appointment will undoubtedly increase Cabinet tensions, despite the warm accolades that were heaped on Green by Government ministers yesterday.

Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude praised Green’s “immense commercial experience”, adding that he had a “fantastic track record”. Meanwhile, Lib Dem Chief Secretary Danny Alexander claimed that Green’s review would help the government “totally rethink” the way it spends public money. Green will be supported by a team of civil servants and report directly to Maude and Alexander.

However, while his over-promoted colleague may be sanguine about this highly controversial appointment, it may push his Lib Dem colleague, business secretary Vince Cable, towards the door marked resignation. Cable was clearly not consulted on the appointment, and when interviewed on Friday, said “there’s a lot I could say on this, but I’d better miss this one out”, adding he was “tempted to comment, but I think I’d better not”.

Indeed, in November 2009, Cable strongly criticised Scottish first minister Alex Salmond when Salmond appointed Jim McColl, also a Monaco-based tax exile, as one of his economic advisors, stating that “there is growing intolerance of British companies and the super-rich who dodge taxes. Having an adviser who is also a tax exile is completely incompatible and totally unacceptable”. With Cable’s recent green paper on bank lending having been watered down by the Treasury so much as to be virtually meaningless, Green’s appointment may be the final straw.

Furthermore, the focus on what are, in relative terms, small government efficiency savings, is a further sign of the coalition’s short-sightedness. As Left Foot Forward’s Will Straw has pointed out, David Cameron wrote in The Sun this week that “benefit fraud is the first and the deepest cut we will make”, blithely ignoring the fact that there is just £1.5bn in benefit and tax credit fraud compared to an estimated £17bn of tax avoidance, evasion and non-payment identified in HMRC’s Protecting Tax Revenues report. In other words, tax dodging dwarfs welfare and tax credit fraud by a factor of more than 10 to one.

In this vein, Paul Kenny, the general secretary of the GMB, struck an appropriately sarcastic tone when he expressed his hope that Green would use his “experience and knowledge to help the government deal with tax avoidance schemes give the government good advice in closing the loopholes”; well said, Paul – but appointing a tax evader to look at ways to cut public spending must be second nature to a party that has spent the past decade being bankrolled by one.

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today. 

66 Responses to “Green’s appointment as ‘cuts Tsar’ drives Cable closer to resignation”

  1. Mr Jabberwock

    “his billions are the result of massive tax avoidance.”

    You obviously can’t make a penny (let a lone a billion) by tax avoidance – you can just keep more of the pennies that you do make.

    If I get dividends from a US company that I own shares in and pay UK income tax on the dividends I receive am I a repugnant tax avoider as I am avoiding US income tax by living in the UK.

  2. Robert

    Avoiding tax, two ways to do that legally or illegally, if you use the legal route then it’s fine, if it’s illegal it’s fraud.

    The fact is in thirteen years Labour did sod all about tax avoidance, it did sod all because it suited them to allow people like this to get away with it.

  3. John Woods

    I know that the US Treasury has similar problems but it cannot be beyond the wit of man to prevent this blatant tax avoidance. Is it possible that Green’s wife had the initial funds to buy the 90%+ ownership of Green’s company that she benefits from. Is she or any of her children UK subjects? There must be a way to stop these profits escaping from the UK economy tax free.

  4. Chris

    @Billy

    LOL, your calling other people idiots when you don’t even have the mental capacity to work out which website your commenting on!

    Please “for the national good”. Green is just another corporate fat cat, skimming off all the cream while paying his workers minimum wage. The fact he has interesting tax arrangements makes it all the more nauseating that this guy is allowed to comment on our public services. We’ve had years of these gurus looking into “waste”, the tories moronic £6bn in year cuts was supposed to be funded entirely from efficiency saving. For example, £1bn of it was going to come from IT projects, they found £100m; thus the child trust funds were chopped. And yet the Audit Commission, a body which has actually saved billions, is chopped by the fat man.

    @Robert

    Labour did make moves to crack down on avoidance, making accounting firms notify the revenue when they’d found a new tax loophole for instance. But they should have done more, if they had the tories would have been the first to speak up for the fat cats.

  5. Mr. Sensible

    Billy, I don’t really care if Arcadia posts proffits of £300 million or -£300 million; if he doesn’t pay his fair shair of taxes, he should be clamped down on.

    It is not right that someone who does not pay his share of taxes should be advising the government on efficiency and waste.

  6. Mr. Sensible

    That should of course be profits.

  7. mike

    Milburn should be expelled from the Labour Party
    along with the rest of the Continuity SDP

    why do we tolerate Field, Hoon, Hoey, Milburn etc

    they are working for Vichy England

  8. DrKMJ

    Greens appointment as cuts Tsar drives Cable closer to resignation: http://bit.ly/coqWhc via @leftfootfwd

  9. Trakgalvis

    Greens appointment as cuts Tsar drives Cable closer to resignation: http://bit.ly/coqWhc via @leftfootfwd

  10. George Sandeman

    good article. green is in absolutely no position to advise government nor is any other pseudo-celebrity. feel free to take a read of this http://bit.ly/aNC9tN

  11. Edward Leathem

    RT @leftfootfwd: Green’s appointment as ‘cuts Tsar’ drives Cable closer to resignation http://bit.ly/aeuyHM

  12. Elect Me

    Funny how that works – hire someone daft at avoiding taxes in order to streamline government.

  13. Step aside Sir Philip – government appoints ANOTHER tax avoider to advise on cuts « A Thousand Cuts

    […] appointment as the coalition government’s new ‘cuts tsar’, Sir Philip Green has rightly made unwanted headlines over his tax […]

  14. Another week, another Tory tax exile – only this time the Daily Mail sinks him | Left Foot Forward

    […] following Left Foot Forward’s piece on Philip Green’s controversial appointment as Government ‘cuts Tsar’, and our exposé on […]

  15. Osborne, Mitchell and Hammond accused of tax avoidance | Left Foot Forward

    […] against the Tories, and the party’s refusal to take action against it, from Lord Ashcroft to Philip Green and the circle of hedge fund managers surrounding the chancellor, and in February, we […]

  16. Mail and Telegraph pull anti-tax-dodging ads | Left Foot Forward

    […] party’s refusal to take action against and clamp down on tax avoidance, from Lord Ashcroft to Philip Green and the circle of hedge fund managers surrounding the Chancellor, while in February, we […]

Leave a Reply