The coalition has announced a u-turn on the controversial dissolution resolution. In doing so they have taken our advice and moved to a two-thirds majority.
Alongside today’s announcement by Nick Clegg of a referendum on the Alternative Vote next year – a story first broken by this blog – the Deputy Prime Minister slipped out a u-turn on the controversial dissolution resolution. The change is a victory for Left Foot Forward, which aided by UCL’s Robert Hazell was the first progressive voice to recognise the distinction between a confidence vote and a dissolution resolution.
The initial coalition agreement announced:
“legislation will be brought forward to make provision for fixed term parliaments of five years. This legislation will also provide for dissolution if 55% or more of the House votes in favour.”
While a number of constitutional and political commentators erroneously confused the dissolution resolution with a confidence vote, Left Foot Forward asked:
“whether 55 per cent is too low a threshold for a dissolution resolution. If the point of a fixed term parliament is that the governing party cannot dissolve parliament to suit itself, perhaps the threshold should be two-thirds as in both the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly.”
In today’s Parliamentary statement, Nick Clegg said:
“there will be an additional power for parliament to vote for an early and immediate dissolution. We have decided that a majority of two thirds will be needed to carry the vote, as opposed to the 55% first suggested, as is the case in the Scottish Parliament. These changes will make it impossible for any government to force a dissolution for its own purposes.
“These proposals should make it absolutely clear to the House that votes of no confidence and votes for early dissolution are entirely separate.”
With one victory under the belt, the next battles must be to decouple the reduction in the number of MPs from the AV vote, and to ensure that fixed terms are four years, rather than five.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
13 Responses to “Coalition announces u-turn on dissolution resolution”
mike
Supported PR for many years (regional top up)
does not mean Labour needs to support this motion for AV in the House
lets let Clegg hang out to dry
Tim Horton
Will – I think many people were concerned about 55% not because they’d confused a no confidence vote with a dissolution resolution, but because for the Westminster Parliament we haven’t codified the relationship between a no confidence vote and a dissolution resolution (as they have in the Scottish Parliament). The danger was that if we formalised the mechanism for dissolution in a way that is different to the current convention, it would prevent a no confidence vote bringing down the government with a simple majority.
However, the good news is that Clegg has now done a U-turn on this too, proposing codification of the relationship between a no confidence vote and dissolution. So the threshold for bringing down the government will effectively remain at 50%+1, not the higher level of 55%.
Good news.
Politics Summary: Tuesday, July 6th | Left Foot Forward
[…] the legislation because of the “outrageously partisan” boundary changes. As reported on Left Foot Forward yesterday, the Coalition also announced a u-turn on the controversial dissolution […]
Rupert Read
This is a great story from LFF; Tim is also correct. Good news all round.
RupertRead
http://bit.ly/d91Mnd This is important – a significant improvement on what the LibCons were previously offering.