Labour's leading leadership candidates have launched a series of attacks on the Coalition Government over the £6 billion of cuts.
Labour’s leading leadership candidates have launched a series of attacks on the Coalition Government over the £6 billion of cuts – described as “painful” by the prime minister this morning. They took aim on everything from the cuts to university places to the cuts to the schools budget – with the Liberal Democrats singled out for particular criticism.
Shadow schools secretary Ed Balls yesterday called on Michael Gove to spell out in detail the £670 million of cuts required at the department for children, schools and families, questioning the lack of detail, the fact there had been “no statement to Parliament, no communications to concerned schools or local authorities” and “no answers to my questions in last week’s Queen’s Speech debate”.
In a letter to the schools seretary, Mr Balls called on him to: confirm that funding for schools will only be protected in 2010/11; explain where funding for free schools could be found “without cuts to the budgets of existing schools”; explain whether he has increased the burden of cuts in 2010-11 that will fall on services financed by local government expenditure, particularly children’s social services; and confirm that more than 10 per cent will be cut from the DCSF grant to local authorities.
He also called on Mr Gove to provide assurances that the £311m of cuts to local authorities would not impact “essential services and programmes for some of our most vulnerable children and young people”, such as the Children’s Fund – designed to tackle social exclusion of children and young people; funding designed to provide positive activities for young people; funding to protect the welfare and improve the life chances of children in care; programmes designed to cut rates of teenage pregnancy; and programmes designed to help young people leaving school to find suitable employment, education or training.
Elsewhere, shadow health secretary Andy Burnham criticised the cuts to universities. He told Sky News yesterday:
“I’m very worried today hearing Vince Cable sounding a very elitist note about university education… It’s wrong to drop the future jobs fund and it’s plain wrong to cut university places. You’ve got to give people hope and you don’t pull the rug from under people.”
Shadow foreign secretary David Miliband, meanwhile, accused Nick Clegg of “breathtaking hypocrisy” over cuts to frontline services “which he campaigned against in the general election”, and also warned of the danger of ending the future jobs fund.
Appearing on the Andrew Marr Show, he said:
“The coalition government have got a honeymoon, but Nick Clegg has shown breathtaking hypocrisy in his Observer column today talking about the cuts he campaigned against in the general elections… They’re repeating the mistakes of the 80s – it’s broken promises not a broken society.”
And today Ed Miliband, shadow climate change secretary, told Left Foot Forward:
“The coalition government promised efficency savings in the coming year and are in fact imposing deep and unfair cuts affecting jobs and services. It is a broken promise, it is short termist because it will damage our economy and it is unfair because it will hit the poorest in society.“
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
20 Responses to “Leadership candidates line up to attack Coalition over cuts”
Billy Blofeld
@Mr Sensible
I’m not making a case for the coalition. I appear to be in agreement with the IMF who are tonight saying “bring on the cuts”……….
Here……..
P.S. You do realise the whole “don’t cut now” bollox was just an election ploy don’t you?
Mr. Sensible
‘Normal Bloke’, it is the City that got our economy in this mess.
And under this plan, it is the most needy who are going to pay through cuts to their public services.
Meanwhile the City gets off with a cut in Corporation Tax.
And the fact is that cutting things like BSF and other capital spending will damage parts of the construction and manufacturing industries.
Anon E Mouse
mike – You seem to have forgotten that after Maggie Thatcher, grammar school Tory was followed by John Major, comprehensive school Tory by Anthony Charles Linton Blair, public school Labour.
What about Harriet Harman, a COUNTESS’S neice?
If you try a class war comparing the Tories against Labour you’ll lose dude – you really need to get a grip as to what’s going on…
NormalBloke
Oh dear Mr. Sensible – look at the facts- one of the first thing Mr.McBroon did was change the regulation of the city – if you lower the fences of the lions enclousure the lions will do as they please – such was the toadying up to the City the labour Party forgot this. The aim has to be to regulate to enable wealth creation but protect the assets of the banks in the first place.
Labour has much to answer for. They need to change but the problem is the centre ground is now firmly occupied by the Coalition – what can Labour do to regain trust?
Leadership candidates line up to attack Coalition over cuts « The best Labour blogs
[…] More… […]