The question of how best to build the progressive fight back was the subject of the Left Foot Forward/Labour List fringe at the Compass conference yesterday.
The question of how best to build the progressive fight back was the subject of the Left Foot Forward/Labour List fringe meeting at the Compass ‘A New Hope‘ post-election conference at the Institute of Education yesterday. Though the day’s headlines were inevitably taken with the latest Labour leadership hustings – in which Diane Abbott again appeared to excel – and Jon Cruddas for his electrifying speech, it was at the fringe where the real pulse of the nation’s progressives could be felt.
As briefed on Friday, our meeting featured Will Straw; Labour List’s editor Alex Smith; Matthew McGregor, whose day job is at Blue State Digital, and who has worked on many election campaigns and spoke as a Labour Party member; and Sian Berry, the Green Party’s candidate for London mayor in 2008, with Will opening the debate by arguing that, if a hung parliament were to occur in the future, Labour “will need to work with Liberal Democrat and Green MPs to secure a majority”.
Speaking first, Alex echoed Will’s call for plurality by saying the party needed to “look outwards, create new organisations that are progressives reaching out, supportive but independent, critical yet productive… we need to work with communities, tenants and residents” and Labour “needs to win back Lib Dem voters”.
Sian spoke about the experience of the Greens in Europe, and that the party was “in a position to help”, and were already working with progressive groups like Hope Not Hate and contributing to progressive blogs such as oursleves and Bright Green Scotland.
Matthew, meanwhile, cautioned against too close an alliance with the Lib Dems, warning:
“Do not assume the Liberals are progressive. Locally, they are fiscally conservative. In local councils throughout the country their cuts hit the poorest, and they are anti-union. Though Labour has to re-earn the label progressive, on issues such as ID cards, the Coalition is much less progressive.
“We’ve seen it this week with the decision on free school meals, scrapping Labour’s extension of the scheme to 500,000 of the poorest working families. And we’ve seen it with the Libs with their position on child trust funds.”
He added that Labour “can’t just be right [on these issues]” but “needs to organise, with groups like 38 Degrees, Friends of the Earth, the Traid Justice Movement and the Fair Trade Network… we need to be open and inclusive, in our decision making, and we need not just a narrow campaign but a broad one”.
The audience seemed split on the issue, with some thinking Labour need not look outside and that party members should be the only ones who have any say, not the broader progressive movement; while others embraced the new ideas of closer co-operation with parties like the Greens and groups like Hope Not Hate, the introduction of primaries and the importance of organisation.
The most incisive comment, however, came not from a Labour Party member, but from an American, who gave an insight into how the Democrats do things, and what lessons Britain might learn, relaying the remarkable tale of one selection in which a candidate who spent one-tenth the amount of his main rival ended up winning the selection, proving that, even in America, money need not be the be all and end all in political selections.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
9 Responses to “A new hope v the old attitudes”
StevenL
The thing about labour ‘progress’ is that it is exactly the same as tory ‘progress’ i.e. doing anything they can to make house prices rise against sterling.
Robert
Who cares anymore, I joined labour in 1963 left in 2005 joined the Liberals in 2006 left in 2010, boy I’m running out of parties I’ve only got the Tories left now.
Problem with people like Cruddas they use people to get something, for example Cruddas was all out in the fight over welfare reforms, we will fight this on the beaches, we will fight it right up until we vote, then I will not bother.
People seem to think we should forget the past voting records of people like Trickett who spend months building up a platform of 42 day detention, argued we must fight fight fight, and then this gent, voted for brown, so he could have a job carry his bags.
I’ve now left the Labour party, I’ve left the Liberals, I may as well try the Tories.
Lunchtime list for June 14th « Talk Issues
[…] A new hope v the old attitudes – A write up of the Compass conference on Saturday, on how to build the progressive "fightback" […]
Anon E Mouse
Good stuff – As I predicted the left needs to evaluate what it stands for then rebuild from the ground up.
Forget catching Lib Dem voters – there isn’t enough of them and they are in government anyway – more has been done to forward their causes than they would get with Labour. Besides which Nick Clegg is a Tory anyway.
Also the Lib-Dems really are unlikely to align themselves with any political party that advocates state authoritarian control as Labour does and the way Labour doesn’t care about Climate Change by approving Runway 3 at Heathrow.
The best the left can do is get a dialogue, a story to sell and work on the whole centre ground of the electorate instead of trying to get Lib-Dem voters…