In the week President Hu held talks with Barack Obama at a summit on nuclear security, David Cameron last night suggested China was a potential nuclear threat.
In the week President Hu held talks with President Obama at a summit on nuclear security, David Cameron last night suggested China was a potential nuclear threat – citing uncertainty “of the future in China” as a reason for maintain Trident and comparing China to Iran; see this post on Left Foot Forward for a video of Cameron’s remarks.
Immediately before the summit, Presidents Obama and Medvedev signed a new START treaty reducing US-Russian nuclear weapons stockpiles and Obama also secured new Chinese co-operation on possible Iranian sanctions.
Following the summit, the past three days has seen a remarkable joint statement by 40 European leaders ranging from former prime ministers and foreign secretaries to defence chiefs and senior parliamentarians. Published by the Royal United Services Institute’s European Leadership Network, the statement calls for the inclusion of all nuclear weapons, from the tactical to the strategic, to be included in multi-lateral disarmament talks.
The group also hails the establishment of nuclear free zones in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia and calls for a “credible process for the discussion of a Weapons of Mass Destruction Free Zone in the Middle East”. The leaders’ statement also pressures the US on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty as well as calling for its adoption by China, Israel, Pakistan, India and North Korea.
RUSI senior fellow Dr Ian Kearns told Left Foot Forward:
“This statement marks the launch of a European Leadership Network for Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation. Its goal is not only to work with the signatories to promote dialogue on these issues within Europe and between Europe and other parts of the world, but also to help build awareness and expertise on nuclear issues, in a politically non-partisan way, across a whole new generation of European political and parliamentary leaders.“
With the foreign policy and international security prime ministerial debate just one week away, it was encouraging to see cross-party support for a new round of multi-lateral disarmament with signatories from Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat statesmen including Lord George Robertson, Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Sir Menzies Campbell.
The British press have understandably focused on the general election campaign, but developments on nuclear weapons security in the last seven days will prove the more lasting.
7 Responses to “Cameron’s fear of Beijing wide of the mark”
El Sid
As I’ve written elsewhere :
Cameron’s comment about Chinese nukes merely shows that he’s in the mainstream of Western military thought. If you Google suitable search terms on site:.mil and/or site:.gov you’ll see that Chinese ICBM capability has been exercising US military planners for over a decade, they’re the only NPT country that are increasing their warhead numbers. To get an overview see this assessment from the USAF :
http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/missile/naic/NASIC2009.pdf
Concerns about Chinese nuclear capability have even reached Congress, see this recent resolution calling on Obama not to go overboard on reducing US nuclear forces :
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.+Con.+Res.+217:
I don’t think many in Europe are really aware of the spectacular rate at which the Chinese are modernising their forces.
Cameron's foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain's interests | Left Foot Forward
[…] is a major diplomatic gaffe which, ahead of the second leaders’ debate on foreign policy, raises a number of questions about […]