Cameron’s fear of Beijing wide of the mark

In the week President Hu held talks with Barack Obama at a summit on nuclear security, David Cameron last night suggested China was a potential nuclear threat.

In the week President Hu held talks with President Obama at a summit on nuclear security, David Cameron last night suggested China was a potential nuclear threat – citing uncertainty “of the future in China” as a reason for maintain Trident and comparing China to Iran; see this post on Left Foot Forward for a video of Cameron’s remarks.

Immediately before the summit, Presidents Obama and Medvedev signed a new START treaty reducing US-Russian nuclear weapons stockpiles and Obama also secured new Chinese co-operation on possible Iranian sanctions.

Following the summit, the past three days has seen a remarkable joint statement by 40 European leaders ranging from former prime ministers and foreign secretaries to defence chiefs and senior parliamentarians. Published by the Royal United Services Institute’s European Leadership Network, the statement calls for the inclusion of all nuclear weapons, from the tactical to the strategic, to be included in multi-lateral disarmament talks.

The group also hails the establishment of nuclear free zones in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia and calls for a “credible process for the discussion of a Weapons of Mass Destruction Free Zone in the Middle East”. The leaders’ statement also pressures the US on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty as well as calling for its adoption by China, Israel, Pakistan, India and North Korea.

RUSI senior fellow Dr Ian Kearns told Left Foot Forward:

“This statement marks the launch of a European Leadership Network for Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation. Its goal is not only to work with the signatories to promote dialogue on these issues within Europe and between Europe and other parts of the world, but also to help build awareness and expertise on nuclear issues, in a politically non-partisan way, across a whole new generation of European political and parliamentary leaders.

With the foreign policy and international security prime ministerial debate just one week away, it was encouraging to see cross-party support for a new round of multi-lateral disarmament with signatories from Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat statesmen including Lord George Robertson, Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Sir Menzies Campbell.

The British press have understandably focused on the general election campaign, but developments on nuclear weapons security in the last seven days will prove the more lasting.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

7 Responses to “Cameron’s fear of Beijing wide of the mark”

  1. Andy Sutherland

    Cameron's fear of Beijing wide of the mark: (via @leftfootfwd)

  2. Malcolm Evison

    Cameron's fear of Beijing wide of the mark | Left Foot Forward

  3. John Banks

    The UK doesn’t even have an ‘independent’ nuclear deterrent.

    There wouldn’t be a situation where we would launch an nuclear attack or counterattack on another country or countries BEFORE the USA does so.

    Although I understand it is very very difficult for any one nation to give up nuclear weapons politically/diplomatically/psychologically when others don’t.

  4. Mr. Sensible

    And it’s foreign affairs next week!

Comments are closed.