UUP oppose policing and justice moves

On Friday, the UUP announced that it could not support the proposals as they stood, although a meeting of its executive this evening will take a final decision.

News that Hillary Clinton has spoken to both Ulster Unionist Party leader, Sir Reg Empey, and Sinn Fein deputy first minister Martin McGuinness, has highlighted the intense work to shore up support for a Tuesday’s Stormont vote on the devolution of policing and justice powers.

The US Secretary of State’s intervention was particularly aimed at securing support from the Ulster Unionists.

On Friday, the UUP announced that it could not support the proposals as they stood, although a meeting of its executive this evening will take a final decision on the matter.

In a statement, the UUP published a list of demands that would have to be met for them to give support for the devolution of policing and justice powers, namely:

• Improving the way the executive works, described by the Ulster Unionists as being “dysfunctional”;

• Addressing key sticking points around education. The UUP want to see a new type of 11-plus exam introduced, after Sinn Fein education minister Catriona Ruane previously abolished the tests from Grammar school;

• A resolution to the thorny issues of regulating parades across Northern Ireland.

Announcing his party’s position, Sir Reg said:

“It remains our view that the current Executive must be capable of exercising its existing powers before such an important issue as policing and justice is devolved.”

The UUP’s position emerged after DUP deputy leader Nigel Dodds, during an interview with Radio Ulster’s Inside Politics programme, said that if the UUP failed to support the devolution of policing and justice, a “serious situation” would arise that could put a halt to the whole process.

Reacting to Sir Reg’s statement, DUP first minister Peter Robinson said:

“Every single party in the Assembly is committed to the devolution of policing and justice powers. Every single party therefore should stand over their commitments made to the public.

“I believe that the people of Northern Ireland are tired of political point-scoring and party positioning. They deserve to see devolution working better.”

And speaking to Sinn Fein’s annual conference on Saturday, Martin McGuinness declared:

“The UUP have three days to sort themselves out. They can do the right thing and join with the rest of us in building a new and better future or they can continue to pursue a negative, rejectionist agenda which is out of step with the majority of unionist opinion the vast majority of citizens on the island.”

Unsurprisingly, the UUP reacted angrily to such statements, with Sir Reg making clear “the UUP will not be blackmailed or bullied by anybody over our attitude” to the devolution of policing and justice.

The UUP’s stance is likely to cause headaches for David Cameron.

In 2008, Cameron described as a “dynamic political force”, a new alliance between his party and the UPP, with joint candidates to be fielded at the General Election.

As a result of the UUP’s opposition to the devolution of policing and justice at the present time, says Ireland Online:

“David Cameron is a supporter of the Hillsborough deal and he now faces the prospect of going to the polls aligned to a party which opposes it.”

Cameron’s troubles are only compounded by the news in January, in a posting by Nick Watt for the Guardian’s politics blog, that some senior Tories were somewhat uncomfortable at how close their party had become to the UUP.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

11 Responses to “UUP oppose policing and justice moves”

  1. John West

    RT @leftfootfwd UUP oppose policing and justice moves: http://is.gd/9WQpD << Cameron's electoral pact with UUP looks ever more insane.

  2. Mark McQuade

    The Orange Order want to take everyone back 30 years and their block vote with UUP will try to do just that!

  3. Liz McShane

    Not a good omen…..

    “UUP policing meeting with McGuinness breaks down after three minutes”

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/08/uup-mcguinness-meeting-policing-breaks-down

  4. Henry

    I know the Tories are rather weird, but what exactly do they get from an alliance with a party that seems to be disappearing (& whose sole MP doesn’t appear to be very keen on the deal anyway)?

  5. Liz McShane

    Henry – The UUP’s sole MP – Sylvia Hermon is more than likely to stand as an independent candidate in the May elections as she has refused to take the Tory whip, luckily, she still enjoys relatively strong support locally (thank goodness).

Comments are closed.