The left need to offer a collective, forward-looking, dynamic and all-inclusive vision of England and Englishness that the people of England can sign up to.
![](https://leftfootforward.org/images/2015/02/This-is-England.jpg)
Our guest writer is Dave Dyke, creator and facilitator of England Left Forward
One of the major successes of the past 13 years, depending on your point of view, has been devolution. The establishment of the Scottish parliament and Welsh assembly, coupled with the advances in the Northern Ireland peace process that seemed impossible 20 years ago, have transformed the governance and the culture of three of the four nations within the Union.
However, this has left a big question at the heart of government, which has also had a knock-on effect culturally:
“How should England be governed?”
This is often referred to in the media as “The English Question”; it is a question that the major political parties have, so far, avoided answering in a satisfactory manner. In fact, the major parties seem to avoid any mention of England and Englishness altogether.
They have either pushed the British agenda or wished to impose the regionalisation of England against the will of the people. The failure of the English regional assembly referendum in the North East in 2004 was due to the proposed assembly being no more than a glorified county council, whose geographical area and powers were dictated from the centre, without consultation with the grassroots.
But there has also been a current of thought, especially on the left, that to debate England and Englishness is inherently racist. This has led to a subsequent reluctance to either encourage the flying of the flag of England or to celebrate St George’s Day.
This has acted as a marvellous recruiting sergeant for parties and organisations of the right and far-right, such as the BNP, with their promises of an English “Folk” Parliament – with its ensuing visions of Apartheid-era South Africa – and the English Defence League.
This is why I have established the England Left Forward network, and the aims are two-fold. The first aim is to provide a space for those of us on the left, whether politically active or otherwise, to articulate, debate and resolve the various aspects of the English Question, in particular with respect to providing England with a legitimate political voice.
The second aim is to identify a vision for the various aspects of England and Englishness that is not nationalistic in nature, but draws on the experience and contributions of all who engage in the debate. For England is a country; it is not a colour, a race or a religion.
Where there’s disagreement on the aims, we hope to come to an accommodation that’s acceptable to all involved. Where there’s agreement, we intend to articulate the most appropriate way of taking things forward.
Currently the left seem to be playing a game of catch-up with the right over the English Question. If we can offer a collective, forward-looking, dynamic and all-inclusive vision of England and Englishness that the people of England can sign up to, as opposed to the nationalistic jingoism and flag-waving of the right, the game, although anything but, will be back on equal terms.
Let’s get working on that vision!
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 117 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
61 Responses to “The left-wing case for an English parliament”
Roger Thornhill
The last thing anyone needs is another layer of bureaucrats and an even bigger State.
England already has representation: MPs.
In line with this, Scotland should combine MP and MSP elections and the winner sit in Holyrood during Scottish matters and come to Westminster for UK-wide matters. The same should happen with the MAs in Wales.
Toque
Lot’s of your own party members disgaree with you Roger, just take a gander at the Libertarian Party membership of the English Free Press.
In any case you’re constructing a Straw man argument if your arguement against an English parliament is based upon “more politicians and more bureaucrats”. Unlike devolution to Scotland and Wales we don’t need to create a new English civil service, we just make parts of Whitehall responsible to the English Parliament, English Government and the English public. The UK Parliament can be drastically reduced in numbers to reflect it’s drastically lower workload, and the Lords can be reformed to reflect the new federal framework by scrutinising both reserved and devolved matters (at present Scotland, Wales and NI have unicameral systems). Alternatively the Commons could be an English parliament with 400 members – the number it was originally designed to accomodate – and the Lords could be the federal parliament with powers of recall over the legislation of the national parliaments.
“Scotland should combine MP and MSP elections and the winner sit in Holyrood during Scottish matters and come to Westminster for UK-wide matters”
You’re in the wrong party because this is UKIP policy, and also the policy of certain Tories (who get sacked for it). The reason James Gray had to ‘step down’ is because the Scots don’t want to abolish their MSPs in favour of dual mandate MPs, and the Welsh don’t want to abolish their AMs either. Abolishing the Assembly Members at Stormont could undermine the peace process with terrible results. It’s all very well proposing a dual mandate system, but the time to do that was pre-1997 when there was a possibility, however remote, of you persuading people that it was a preferable system (personally I think it’s a moronic idea because a politician cannot serve two masters and be elected on a Scottish and UK manifesto – conflict of interest – but it doesn’t much matter because it is going to happen).
Mr. Sensible
I may be in favour of devolution, but not that in favour of devolution.
barry
The EDL want black and white to unite. It is unfair to label them as racists.
If they were campaigning against extreme christian fundamentalism they would be cheered on by the left. let’s have an English Parliament for all in England.stop this nonsense by politicians and the media that England does not exist.However, I strongly believe that the issue of an English Parliament should be put to the people of England by referendum. An English Parliament should not come about as a last resort of defeated unionist politicians.
keith young
The left-wing case for an English parliament | Left Foot Forward http://cli.gs/5YbtT