Revealed: Hidden agenda behind Express attack on housing minister

Today's Daily Express front page criticising Housing Minister John Healey is yet another example of the Express at its hypocritical, biased worst.

Today’s Daily Express front page attack on housing minister John Healey – saying he “insulted” struggling homeowners in a radio interview – is yet another example of the Express at its hypocritical, biased worst.

The article:

• Is written by the wife of the Tory housing renewal minister

• Fails to mention the repossession rate under the Tories was nearly double the rate it is under Labour

• Takes Healey’s remarks completely out of context

• Criticises his expenses – the author making no mention of her husband’s house “flipping” and £66,000 expenses claim, including £3,000 for a “Berber” carpet and a £300 pool cleaning bill

Report author Sarah O’Grady is the wife of the Conservative MP for Peterborough, Stewart Jackson, shadow minister for communities and local government since January 2008.

He has responsibility for the fire service, flooding, housing renewal areas and the Thames Gateway and is currently writing a green paper on regeneration for the Tory manifesto.

Her report quotes Healey’s remarks in the BBC radio interview:

“For some people it can be the only, and it can in fact be the best, option for them to allow their home to be repossessed. Sometimes it is impossible for people to maintain the mortgage commitments they’ve got. It may be the best thing in those circumstances.”

Which suddenly becomes:

“It’s OK to lose your home”

On repossessions, O’Grady writes that:

“The figure is the highest since 1995 and a significant 15 per cent increase on 2008, said the Council of Mortgage Lenders.”

Yet once again, the Tory housing renewal minister’s wife fails to put this in context. Comparing recent years with the early nineties, the figures show that:

• In 1991, 75,500 properties were repossessed (0.77% of all mortgages) – in 2009, 46,000 properties were repossessed (0.43%)

• In 1992, 350,000 househoulds were in arrears (3.6% of mortgages) – in 2009, 188,330 househoulds were in arrears (2.5%)

• In 1991, there were 9.8 million mortgages (and 13,050,000 homeowners) – in 2008, there were 11.1 million (14,628,000)

In the three years following his election in 2005, O’Grady’s husband claimed £66,722 for their house.

This included £2,545 in solicitors’ fees, a £2,412 initial mortgage charge, £1,836 in mortgage broker fees, £1,430 for the installation of security gates at the house, carpentry bills and repairs to his television aerial, £1,145.63 solicitors’ conveyancing costs, £1,336 in mortgage fees, £775 for plumbing work in his “summer room”, £705 for a survey, £600 to his building society and £435 for insurance.

He also claimed more than £1,300 for “household expenditure” from John Lewis, bedding, kitchenware, lightbulbs and £200 for a new refrigerator. Additionally, O’Grady’s husband claimed £3,000 for a “100 per cent wool berber carpet” for the house and £741 for a king-size bed – both of which, presumably, she benefited from.

Last week, he was ordered to repay a £304.10 claim for “swimming pool maintenance” in July 2006 by the Legg review.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

21 Responses to “Revealed: Hidden agenda behind Express attack on housing minister”

  1. Dpoc41

    RT @leftfootfwd: Revealed: Hidden agenda behind Express attack on housing minister:

  2. Peter Carrol

    It is pretty obvious Healey doesn’t think repossession is a good thing. He is just saying that there comes a moment when it is better to have your home repossesed than to have to suffocate in debt. He is saying sometimes it is the best option, which is right.

    There are so many real arguments to have, typical right-wing press bluster…

  3. Martin Johnston

    RT @leftfootfwd: Revealed: Hidden agenda behind Express attack on housing minister: #reasonsnottovotetory

  4. Anon E Mouse

    Shamik – How refreshing to actually have a Labour minister telling the truth.

    Why is it everyone screams about the fact Labour ministers are always lying and spinning yet when one tells the truth, as it clearly is, they get criticised?

    I would say though that the usual smearing of the messenger (stop doing it please LFF – it will come back at some point and bite you…) is not attractive and only devalues a perfectly valid article.

    Either the story is true or it’s not. I heard what he said live on R5 Shamik, you do not need to add the insults.

    In your world Shamik, since her husband is a Tory, does that mean that it was Jack Straw who smoked dope and not his son, Will?

    (Sorry Will – I just use that to illustrate a point, not as a means of criticism , what you do is your business)

  5. Shamik Das

    Anon, I don’t quite see the point you’re making.

    Let me just re-iterate my point about the author: She has a go at Healey’s expense claims, yet her own husband is no saint. She could have written the repossessions story without mentioning Healey’s expenses – you’ll have to ask her why she opened that can of worms.

    On the broader point of the relevance of her husband, he is the Tory spokesman for housing renewal – and she is attacking the Labour housing minister. She may have been wise to recuse herself from this report.

Comments are closed.