The Express are wrong on housing benefit dependency

The Express reports that housing benefit payments will rise this year. The rise is due to the recession and rents, not a "culture of benefits dependency".

The Express this morning reports that “Housing benefit payments will soar by 15 per cent to £20.8billion over the next year.” They are right but the rise is due to the recession and rising rents, not the “culture of benefits dependency” that the paper cites.

The housing benefit bill will rise over the next few years but this is partly the result of more people being unemployed (and therefore eligible). A DWP spokeswoman is quoted saying, “These forecasts were done on a precautionary basis at the time of the Budget but, with unemployment 400,000 lower than predicted as a result of the action we have taken, we are already saving hundreds of millions of pounds in unemployment and housing benefit compared to those Budget numbers.” She is right: these predictions are based on budget unemployment numbers, which are likely to overestimate the peak by some 400,000. The eventual cost will be lower.

The higher bill is also due to the trend rise in housing costs, in both the social and private rented sectors. In the social sector this is because housing benefit basically tracks rents (which have been rising above the rate of inflation) and in the private rented sector because the local housing allowance has been more generous than expected. The latter is where these horror stories of people getting thousands of pounds a week on housing benefit have come from. DWP put out a consultation to deal with this problem at the end of last year.

The figures used by the Express for the growth in welfare spending since 1997 doesn’t distinguish between different types of spending. For example, a lot of the increase is in higher pensions, tax credits and child benefit. Little of the increase is due to increases in out-of-work benefits. And the Express citing “the failure to stamp out fraud and welfare addiction” misses the facts. Both fraud and error have come down substantially in recent years and are now at historically low levels.

Reforming housing benefit is the toughest task in social policy. The Government is right to control spending in the private rented sector by taking out the very highest rents from the calculation used to work out the going rate in an area. Beyond that the solution really lies in looking at the public subsidy for housing as a whole – on both the supply and the demand side – because the rise in housing benefit is really due to increasing rents. Building more social housing in particular would certainly help to bring down the cost.

Image hat-tip: Mail Watch

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

2 Responses to “The Express are wrong on housing benefit dependency”

  1. Roger

    Ross Clark makes several good points in the Times today – fundamentally the problem is a legacy of Right to Buy and can only be resolved by councils building not just more social housing but larger 3+ bedroom units.

    My own view is that this in itself is not enough – the only time we ever came close to beating the housing crisis was in the 50s and 60s when we were building high rise developments.

    Obviously we can’t return to shoddy tower blocks but there have been huge advances in design and building technologies since then and modern medium- if not high-rise developments are a very different proposition now – as you can see from the number of luxury apartment blocks rising up in central London.

    Plus the Left needs to start developing genuinely anti-natalist policies – it is simply anti-social to produce 5, 10 or 15 children and expect the taxpayer to house and educate them.

  2. Jonathan Taylor

    @leftfootfwn expose the Express on their housing benefit dependency claims

Comments are closed.