NGOs have responded to David Cameron's plans to "join up" the International Development and Defence budgets with dismay.
Left Foot Forward reported this morning on David Cameron’s speech outlining plans to “join up” the international development and defence budgets as part of his party’s National Security Strategy; we have contacted NGOs for their reaction to the speech.
Kirsty Hughes, Oxfam’s Head of Policy, said:
“David Cameron’s headline pledge to meet the UK’s aid promises remains welcome but the small print revealed today is of real concern.
“Removing aid from the poorest people and using it for military goals rather than tackling poverty would be a big step backwards and would undermine the UK’s leadership role on international development.”
Save the Children’s Director of Policy David Mepham added:
“We welcome David Cameron’s commitment to ring-fence the UK international development budget. However there is an urgent need for the Conservatives to clarify that the purpose of development aid is poverty reduction, not subsidising military operations.
“Save the Children is very concerned that the Conservatives’ security spokesperson, on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme this morning, left open the possibility of significant aid funds being diverted into stabilisation units.
“This dangerously muddles up security and development goals, increasing the risks facing development and humanitarian workers in conflict situations.”
Meanwhile, the New Statesman reported that:
“Cameron can expect a fight from NGOs if he tries to push all the government’s development efforts into mopping up after costly wars. He promised to maintain a 0.7 per cent share of gross national income for development spending.
“But, as Oxfam’s response shows, if this simply means taking funds away from current development projects to support his security strategy, it will be deeply unpopular.”
More analysis to follow on Monday.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
18 Responses to “NGOs’ concerns at Cameron’s plan to “join up” budgets of DFID and MOD”
Manc Young Labour
RT @nickpringle: David Cameron "Removing aid from the poorest people & using it for military goals" http://is.gd/6kqLL
Manc Labour Students
RT @nickpringle: David Cameron "Removing aid from the poorest people & using it for military goals" http://is.gd/6kqLL
Michael Lewis
RT @manclabstudents: RT @nickpringle: David Cameron "Removing aid from the poorest people & using it for military goals" http://is.gd/6kqLL
David Taylor
@ Tim, yes I think it can work in the right circumstances, and DfID are already working together with the MoD in Afghanistan through the Stabilisation Unit. The key question here is about diluting the aid budget for MoD operations, any money for military purposes should be additional.
@ Shaun Interesting points. My key concern is about the aid budget, but we do need to be careful about how much we join up the MoD and DfID, it is a difficult balance to strike. A spokesperson for Médicins sans Frontières was quoted in a The Times article on this saying: “We secure access to very tricky parts of the world because of civilians understanding that we are not military. Where military sell themselves as humanitarians it is very, very problematic.”
StopTheRight
NGOs’ concerns at Cameron’s plan to “join up” budgets of DFID and MOD http://alturl.com/emvg #p2