Iain Dale today writes that "Tories have more BME candidates than Labour." He is wrong: Labour has 42 black and minority ethnic candidates to the Conservative's 38.
Iain Dale today writes that “Tories have more BME candidates than Labour.” He is wrong: Labour has 44 BME candidates to the Conservative’s 38.
To be fair, Dale took his total from Operation Black Vote, which excluded 12 Labour MPs who are standing again. Dale writes:
“Yesterday, Operation Black Vote eulogised about the 30 BME candidates Labour has standing for them at the next election. It was very strange that the author of the piece, Lester Holloway, made no mention of the fact that at the last election the Conservatives had more BME candidates than Labour (41 to 32), a fact which is probably going to be repeated at the forthcoming election. The Conservatives have selected 38 BME candidates so far.”
That said, the crucial point is not the number of PPCs but the number who make it to Parliament. At the last election, just 2 of the Conservative’s 41 black or minority ethnic PPCs were returned (4.8 per cent) compared to 13 of Labour’s 32 (40.6 per cent). The Liberal Democrats returned no BME candidates.
Labour also have 20 PPCs in seats currently held by sitting Labour MPs while the Tories have just four. Dale predicts that 13 will be returned this time (34.2 per cent) but this is presumably based on his projection of an overall majority for the Tories.
Meanwhile, on the day that Harriet Harman raises again the issue of class, the GMB have published an analysis of the occupations of Tory candidates. It shows that of the 537 candidates and existing MP selected to stand 96 per cent of Tory candidates at next general election are from the top three (of ten) occupational groups. These are managers and senior officials; professional occupations; and associate professional and technical occupations. Of this group, 63 are from the banking and finance industry.
Paul Kenny, GMB General Secretary said:
“People from lower social backgrounds are particularly scarce among the Tory candidates at the next election.Less than 1% come from the six lower occupational groups employing 56% of the UK workforce.
UPDATE 16.37:
The OBV article also omitted the selections of Victor Agarwal in North Swindon and
Dr Amanjit Singh Jhund in Windsor. An earlier version excluded these PPCs and wrongly stated that Labour only had 42 BME PPCs. It is actually 44 as the corrected article outlines.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
26 Responses to “Dale wrong on BME candidates”
Michael
You talk about ‘BME’ candidates as if they’re pin-badges to be collected, rather than individuals elected to serve. Comparing your BME candidates as if they were collector trophies might well be legitimately interpreted as at best distasteful, and at worst bordering on racist. This really is poor form.
Mark
You beat me to it Michael. Boasting of the numbers is embarrassing and factional.
But Will Straw makes a good point, the number of candidates doesn’t matter, it’s the number of MPs. But since the Tories tend to represent rural seats compared to Labour’s urban constituencies, is it not actually representative for Labour to have more “BME”?
Joe
I don’t think correcting Ian Dale is poor form; take a look at his blog if you think listing BME candidates is in anyway like displaying trophies. Seeing PMs as individuals elected to serve is also slightly misleading given the importance of the party selection process, and the way individuals are selected for winnable seats.
Joe
MPs I mean…
Quietzapple
Sir @IainDale is a pointless, losing propagandist RT @leftfootfwd
BME PPCs: @iaindale wrong Lab 42 Con 38. http://bit.ly/7WFY6u @psbook