Copenhagen deal vital to domestic support on climate change

An exclusive poll outlines that a Copenhagen deal is critical to winning public support for domestic green taxes. Support increases if a deal is reached.

An exclusive YouGov poll for Left Foot Forward outlines that a global deal at Copenhagen is critical to winning over public support for key domestic measures. Support for interventions that would increase motoring and flying costs increases dramatically in circumstances where a deal is reached.

YouGov interviewed 2095 adults on December 3rd and 4th. The results show that climate change remains a low priority – and has not increased in salience despite the wide media coverage of the issue in the past few weeks.

Even among the 24 per cent who say it’s a “big and urgent issue: radical steps need to be taken”, only 45 per cent say it is among the top issues facing the country, and only 36 per cent say is among the top issues facing them personally. But 46 per cent of people accept that “standards of living will have to rise more slowly.”

The public’s willingness to act has also fallen despite its higher profile in recent years but a strong deal could make a difference. Scepticism about the willingness of Russia, China and India to implement any deal, already high three years ago, is even higher now: only 13 per cent (down from 17 per cent) think they would implement any agreed measures. By contrast, faith in the US is up, though still not high. Four years ago 24 per cent thought they would implement agreed measures. Now, in the Obama era, the figure is up, but only to 34 per cent. There has been a sharp drop in the number thinking Britain should take a lead in fighting global warming, from 49 per cent to 36 per cent.

However, if there is a deal at Copenhagen, the willingness of people to accept higher motoring and flying costs goes up, from 26 per cent (when the same question is asked with no reference to Copenhagen) to 39 per cent, while the  number opposed to higher costs falls from 64 per cent to 46 per cent. There is majority support for greater investment in renewable energy regardless of the outcome at Copenhagen.

Conservative voters are far less willing to pay more than Labour or Liberal Democrat voters who have net support of 11 and 17 per cent respectively for higher green taxes.

15 Responses to “Copenhagen deal vital to domestic support on climate change”

  1. Anon E Mouse

    Liz McShane – Because the minimum wage isn’t enough to live on two things happened – it may be the law of unintended consequences, but it’s true in any case.

    1.Skilled workers, plumbers, chippys and the like had to compete with Poles who would do the skilled jobs for minimum wage rather than £30 / hour.

    2.Semi-skilled workers had to go cap in hand to the government for Working Families Tax Credits creating a client state.

    We should have eased in the new EU countries like France and Germany and I think had two levels of minimum wage for skilled/semi skilled workers…

    With the majority Blair had though it’s not exactly a lot to achieve – what happened to Lord reform?

  2. Liz McShane

    Anon – with the Labour Government we would not have had it at all – and I think it’s important to remember that. Anyway we are rather digressing here as the thread is about Copenhagen & Climate change…….

  3. Public support for helping poor countries soars when informed of the consequences | Left Foot Forward

    […] Sunday Left Foot forward published a poll which found that securing a deal at Copenhagen is key to winning public support for climate […]

  4. 100 reasons why "vote blue, go green" won't work | Left Foot Forward

    […] YouGov survey for Left Foot Forward found net -25 per cent of Conservative supporters oppose “higher taxes, such as on petrol and […]

  5. Scientists face asymmetries in public debates on climate change | Left Foot Forward

    […] debate, hosted by Policy Network, examined growing public scepticism over whether climate change is manmade and what should be done by the scientific community in […]

Comments are closed.