Cameron cannot brush aside the tax-status scandal

Anyone seeking power should play by the same rules as the public. David Cameron’s belated response to the tax affairs of Goldsmith and Ashcroft is revealing.

Gone are the days when the general public viewed politicians as men and women to be revered from a distance. The expenses scandal illustrated that they are as susceptible to the temptation to make the most of the financial opportunities presented to them, however dubious the morality of doing so, as the rest of us.

At the very least, however, we must still be entitled to expect that those seeking to wield the power of government are no worse than the rest of us: That they abide by the same laws, are subject to the same norms of behaviour and, perhaps most importantly of all given the current economic situation, that they pay the same taxes as us.

Until this week, the Conservative Party apparently did not agree. It has been revealed that Tory candidate Zac Goldsmith has held non-domiciled tax status for over a decade – and unbelievably, held it until well after being selected as a parliamentary candidate. Estimates on how much money he may have saved on his £200 million fortune as a result of his tax status vary, but the figure is beside the point. What matters is that David Cameron thought it appropriate to champion a man as a future Member of Parliament who for his entire life has explicitly argued that the UK is not his home and who has used his position of privilege to avoid contributing to a society he now seeks to represent.

This is not a debate about what we should do about non-domiciles in general. It does not necessarily matter that Zac Goldsmith is an incredibly wealthy man by virtue of his father’s business interests. It is however blindingly obvious that someone seeking the power to decide on matters of public life should have an unblemished record of participating in public life. In the same vein, had Lord Ashcroft not sought to become a peer, then his tax status would be less of an issue. And in the spirit of evidence-based blogging, Labour’s Lord Paul is in a similar position.

David Cameron’s belated response to the scandal is to propose a pathetically obvious new law that prohibits legislators from holding non-domicile status. That a law of this kind is needed illustrates how low Parliament has stooped. That it has taken this long for Cameron to realise that there might be a problem with his poster-boy candidate is revealing. That he still refuses to clarify the tax status of his party’s Deputy Chairman, most significant donor and a senior peer, remains an absolute scandal.

6 Responses to “Cameron cannot brush aside the tax-status scandal”

  1. jaqi

    RT @leftfootfwd: David Cameron cannot brush aside the tax status scandal. His failure to act sooner is revealing http://bit.ly/6wHXZS

  2. Swagata

    I totally agree. But Goldsmith is a mere candidate and hopefully Lib Dem Susan Kramer will send him packing.

    Instead it’s more urgent to ask questions about Geoffrey Robinson’s offshore assets, or the non-dom status of Labour fundraisers like Lord Benjamin Levy and Lord Swraj Paul, these people have been elevated to high office already.

  3. John77

    Chris Huhne’s estimate assumes that Zac has all his offshore assets in a country without a double-taxation treaty with the UK.
    You may not have noticed that Eton, unlike Notting Hill Comprehensive, has an entrance exam that excludes those with an IQ below 120, let alone 90.
    Also, PLEASE, can you ask Lord Ashcroft about his tax status rather than moaning that those who have NO RIGHT TO KNOW omit to trumpet it from the rooftops.
    Next time, would you care to publish your own tax return? And your father’s?

  4. Cameron forced to amend “Ashcroft amendment” after dancing to piper’s tune | Left Foot Forward

    […] a line under a series of damaging stories about Tory tax avoidance. Yesterday Left Foot Forward highlighted the Conservative leader’s poor response to the scandals, and on Sunday the Observer calculated […]

  5. £200m of aid budget to be spent on St Helena airport – after lobbying from Lord Ashcroft | Left Foot Forward

    […] Cameron cannot brush aside the tax-status scandal – Varun Chandra, December 15th 2009 Share | Permalink | Leave a comment […]

  6. So, Mr Cameron, are Tory boys Philip Green and Gary Barlow “morally wrong” as well? | Left Foot Forward

    […] Cameron cannot brush aside the Ashcroft tax-status scandal 15 Dec […]

Leave a Reply