The madness of a “manifesto mandate”

A manifesto mandate for wider renegotiation, likely to be pursued by Cameron, is more worrying than the hollow gesture of a referendum after Lisbon is ratified.

As the Conservative civil war over David Cameron’s expected u-turn on a Lisbon treaty becomes clear, Left Foot Forward feels no ease from a sense of schadenfreude on the left. The “manifesto mandate” for wider renegotiation, which Tim Montgomerie predicts Cameron will pursue, is more worrying than the hollow gesture of a referendum after Lisbon is ratified.

On the eve of Conservative party conference, the Guardian revealed that Cameron would “rule out a referendum on the Lisbon treaty if the measure is ratified” and, if elected, plan to:

“Repatriate social and employment powers to a national level. This would effectively mean restoring Britain’s opt out from the social chapter.”

As ardent eurosceptic Ruth Lea has told this blog, “The Social chapter was a special protocol at the time of Maastricht but it was absorbed into the major treaties during Amsterdam.” Following this logic, career diplomat Sir Stephen Wall wrote recently:

“[The] return of social and employment legislation to national control … would require the agreement of 26 other states. And no concession would be made to Britain without us giving something in return. Would we, as other EU members might well demand, give up our budget rebate in exchange? The rebate is worth £3 billion a year.”

And even if a Conservative government did negotiate a successful repatriation of social and employment powers, it would have disatrous consequences for British workers. As Left Foot Forward has shown the following rights could be put at risk:

• A minimum of 26 weeks maternity leave for women, and two weeks for men

• The Temporary Agency Workers directive which will ensure that 1.3 million workers for these agencies will be given pay and paid holidays comparable to the equivalent full-time employee doing the same job.

• The Transfer of Undertakings/Protection of Employment (TUPE) Directive, which ensures that workers retain basic employment, pension and seniority rights if their company is taken over

• Equality between men and women in the labour market and at work

• Social security and social protection for workers

• Protection of workers where their employment contract is terminated

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

10 Responses to “The madness of a “manifesto mandate””

  1. Will Straw

    No place for schadenfreude if Tories u-turn on Lisbon. Their repatriation plan is a disaster for the UK http://bit.ly/2XxY4L

  2. Claire Spencer

    RT @wdjstraw: No place for schadenfreude if Tories u-turn on Lisbon. Their repatriation plan is a disaster for the UK http://bit.ly/2XxY4L

  3. Henry

    For those of us who believe is electoral reform, a ‘manifesto mandate’ is a sick joke. You have no mandate for anything if you’ve won 37 or 38% of the vote.

  4. Patrick Daykin

    RT: @leftfootfwd The madness of a "manifesto mandate" for wider EU renegotiation http://bit.ly/2XxY4L

  5. John Laity

    Can British politics survive the Lisbon treaty? Is Europe ready for the British press?

    Cast your mind forward:

    It is 2011 and we have an unhappy Prime Minister Cameron and an EU President Blair. The UK looks to be on the brink of recovery, but can’t quite climb out of economic recession due to its ongoing support in Afghanistan and the bungled sale of Northern Rock, Lloyds and RBS toxic debt.

    In between the headlines of troop death figures hitting a milestone 2000, the Telegraph turns it’s eye towards European MP expenses. A leaked report shows how the European Vice President Peter Mandleson has claimed interest relief on his Brussels residence and that the UK tax payer has been funding his easyjet fights to Europe…

    Oh dear he we go again…

    When we flap on and on about Europe, we should remember that the Accounts for Europe are a nightmare…Let alone the expenses system, upon which the whole of Europe revolves.

Comments are closed.