Grant Shapps' plans to give social tenants nationwide mobility are good. But they miss the crucial point - the lack of mobility is a symptom and not a cause.
Shadow housing minister Grant Shapps MP writes today for Conservative Home about the Tories’ new plans to give social tenants nationwide mobility.
On the face of it, there is not a lot to disagree with here. It is indeed the case that mobility within the social housing sector is poor, and this can act to greatly restrict the opportunities of social tenants.
Yet in a broader sense Shapps misses the crucial point. He says that it is this lack of mobility that has been one of the key causes of polarisation in our society, “driving the ‘haves’ and have nots’ further apar.” But the lack of mobility is, in part, a symptom of polarization, and not itself an obvious cause.
The deeper processes that have been at work are the effects of the excessive targeting of social housing, increasingly concentrated only on the most needy, and the cult of ownership. Both of these processes send out a very clear signal – that social housing is the tenure of last resort. When this happens it is all too easy to characterize tenants as the ‘undeserving poor’ – the “second class citizens” that Shapps speaks of.
When this happens the argument for more social housing become ever harder to make, because it is widely seen as being for people that are ‘not like us’. This, in turn, prevents us from halting the slide in supply. Moreover, it is the shameful lack of social housing supply that makes mobility so difficult in the first place – and which is chief among the real causes of the polarization that Shapps professes to deplore.
And here’s the rub. Apart from mobility, the official Conservative line on social housing is the need for a new right to buy that rewards tenants displaying “good behaviour“. Meanwhile behind the scenes, there are increasing calls for even more targeting of social housing on only the neediest. Both of these measures are sure ways to entrench disadvantage in the social housing sector.
Our guest writer is James Gregory, Research Fellow at the Fabian Society and author of ‘In the Mix: Narrowing the gap between public and private’
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
2 Responses to “Grant Shapps misses the point on social housing”
John Hitchin
RT @leftfootfwd Grant Shapps misses the point on social housing http://bit.ly/v2wKD. >> Helpful analysis by James Gregory of @thefabians
Richard T
As a general point, working class people tend not to be mobile – there’s research going back a long way about community ties and with wage levels low and job security low particularly for someone who is new into the job, social mobility is limited.
On the specific point of facilitating mobility, now just remind me who instituted the mass sale of council houses and strangely these sales were the better homes (who in their right mind would buy a tower block flat?)? In addition both Tory and labour governments have restricted the ability to replace those houses sold so as an elementary point of supply and demand, Grant Shapps’ wee initiative doesn’t amount to a great deal since demand isn’t high and supply is limited largely through government dictat.