One of Ian Plimer’s central claims – reported by Melanie Phillips for The Spectator - is that Arctic sea ice is in fact growing. This assertion is, of course, simply wrong. But this week’s magazine, in arguing for new fossil fuel extraction in Arctic wilderness areas, carries the reverse claim. Are we witnessing a new editorial line on climate change – or is the magazine simply unconcerned about contradicting itself in the starkest terms on the biggest issue of our time?
Back in July, The Spectator caused controversy by splashing with the headline, “Relax: Global Warming is all a myth.” The piece was based on a new book from Ian Plimer which had already been systematically pulled apart by real climate scientists. Plimer is also now in an ongoing and entertaining spat with George Monbiot over his spurious claims.
Anyway, Left Foot Forward can now report an interesting development. One of Plimer’s central claims – reported by Melanie Phillips for The Spectator – is that Arctic sea ice is in fact growing. This assertion is, of course, simply wrong. But now this week’s magazine, in arguing for new fossil fuel extraction in Arctic wilderness areas, carries this reverse claim:
“Climate change is creating opportunities to exploit new shipping routes and untapped gas and mineral resources… as the ice retreats, the region can soon be properly explored and vast natural resources exploited… True, sea ice is vanishing — it reaches its annual minimum at this time of year, and now covers around two thirds of the area it covered 30 years ago.”
This is far from the first time that a prominent vehicle of climate change denial has changed tack. Another astounding retreat came from The Daily Mail’s science editor, then perhaps the UK’s most influential ‘sceptic,’ Michael Hanlon.
There has been a change in editor over at The Spectator this past week. Are we witnessing a new editorial line on climate change – or is the magazine simply unconcerned about contradicting itself in the starkest terms on the biggest issue of our time?
22 Responses to “Spectator’s spectacular U-turn on climate change”
Shamik Das
RT @leftfootfwd: The Spectator’s spectacular u-turn on climate change:- http://tinyurl.com/speccie-u-turn
Will Straw
Joss Garman for @leftfootfwd on the Spectator’s spectacular U-turn on climate change http://bit.ly/NGlTN
labourmatters
RT @leftfootfwd The Spectator’s spectacular u-turn on climate change: http://tinyurl.com/speccie-u-turn
keeprightonline
You must be kidding. You’re naive to the point of Gordon Brown if you believe that these refutations from scientists have anything to do with the real science. The problem is the state funds so much climate change crap, which in turn employs scientists and gives them funding (which they then can use for other things) – that no scientist would dare speak against climate change for fear of having his budget slashed in half.
If you want to get the truth from science, take it out of the hands of politics and politicians. Then you might realise that the facts do not correlate for 100% man made ‘global warming’.
Yes, climate change is happening- but not to the degrees which people like you would have us think/taxed for.
For SHAME.
Ben
Dear keeprightonline
I wonder if you might enlighten us. In the Arctic sea lice trend one of deplation or increase? (answer, by the way: it’s decreasing pretty rapidly). Why is it decreasing so rapidly? Why does it matter? Please enlighten us.