In George Osborne's speech to Demos last week, he looked to Sweden to provide evidence for how a Conservative government could reform the education system and provide “more for less” while also delivering high standards. But the reforms would cost £1.2 billion and it's not clear that the Swedish system is the panacea that the Conservative Party suggest.
In George Osborne’s speech to Demos last week, he looked to Sweden to provide evidence for how a Conservative government could reform the education system and provide “more for less” while also delivering high standards.
Swedish ‘free schools’ are independent of political control and have to meet basic standards set by government in addition to following a core curriculum. Tory enthusiasm for the concept was first announced in 2007 when they published Raising the bar, closing the gap – their only Education policy paper under David Cameron’s leadership.
But Osborne’s rhetoric has not been backed up by any real explanation of how cost savings would be achieved in practice. In the 2007 paper, the Tories proposed an extra 220,000 school places (p. 9). Maintaining current levels of funding per child (set at £5,250 for 2010-11) would result in annual costs of £1.2 billion.
These annual costs cannot be covered by the proposed savings of £4.5 billion from the Building Schools for the Future programme (p.39) since this has been earmarked “for the building of New Academies.” But following George Osborne’s recent announcement that spending on schools would not be protected, it appears that both the building costs and annual funding costs of the Tories’ plans to create 220,000 new places are in doubt.
Even if they could find the money it’s not clear that the Swedish system is the panacea that the Conservative Party suggest. The Swedish reforms in 1990 were on the background of an economic downturn and a clamour to reduce public spending (sound familiar?). But a 2004 paper co-written by the respected Princeton economist Alan Krueger (now President Obama’s Assistant Secretary of the Treasury) outlined that spending per student as a percentage of GDP per capita declined from 34% in 1991 to 24% in 1999.
Most worryingly, the mid-1990s saw signs of increasing segregation by family background, growing variance in resource allocation between local authorities, and greater inequality in school outcomes – a trend which continued into the early parts of this decade. The paper suggests that all this has fallen disproportionately on those with poorly educated parents or recent immigrants.
Free schools in Sweden may have opened up the possibility of a different education system to a small proportion of children (8% of primary pupils and 15% of those in secondary schools), but for the majority that still find themselves in the state system, the evidence points to growing inequalities and an increasingly tough battle for scarce resources.
5 Responses to “Unaccounted £1bn cost of Tory school reforms”
Pockets
Welcome to the blogosphere, LeftFootForward. Nice website, good to see bloggers invoking actual evidence 😉
That said, I thought the best way to welcome you would be to disagree (respectfully) with this post, which I think makes a fairly basic mistake – confusing school places with pupils. The UK school system ensures funds follow pupils, not places. And the Tories have proposed 220,000 new school places – not 220,000 new pupils. More here: http://www.hundredpockets.com/2009/08/welcome-to-the-blogosphere/
Still, LeftFootForward is going on the blogroll, and I’ll keep checking back. Best of luck to you…
Owen Meredith
Interesting story, but a lot of the evidence you sight in pre-2007 stuff, i.e. before the economic downturn. Surely the Tories have (as Labour will) already indicated that these polices will be redrawn in coming months to cope with the state of public finances?
Philip Walker
What Pockets said, with stilts on.
I have to disagree on one point, though: were Alan Clark still around, I’m sure 220,000 new pupils would be almost a manifesto commitment. Ahem.
Tory teacher plans will have little or no impact | Left Foot Forward
[…] schools. Left Foot Forward highlighted some of the evidence against the Swedish Schools model in August and further evidence from the Trends in International Maths and Science Study (TIMMS) shows that […]
Yet another blow to Tories' "free schools" policy | Left Foot Forward
[…] On the unaccounted £1 billion cost of the […]