Why it’s time for more paternity leave in the UK

The UK is well below the OECD average in terms of the paid leave it offers to men

beachchildren

 

Jeremy Corbyn and David Cameron clashed over childcare on today’s PMQs, with the Labour leader asking why the Conservatives had not fulfilled their promise of tax-free childcare.

Corbyn also pointed to a report by a spending watchdog which showed that a third of families ‘promised 30 hours’ free childcare now won’t receive it’.

Meanwhile, the OECD has published analysis of the take-up of paid parental leave by fathers, highlighting the progress that still needs to be made in most countries.

The report ‘Parental Leave: where are the fathers?’ shows that the UK is well below the OECD average in terms of paid leave it offers to men. On average, OECD countries offer eight weeks of paid paternity and paid parental leave that can be taken only by the father. Korea offers 53 weeks, Japan 52 weeks, France 28 weeks, and Norway and Sweden 10 weeks. The UK currently offers only two.

Last year new provisions were introduced for shared parental leave (SPL) which can be split between the mother and father, but research by the OECD and others shows that men are still reluctant to take this (in January the charity Working Families showed that only between between 0.5 and two per cent of eligible fathers have made use of the provision so far).

Men are far more likely to take leave that is reserved specifically for them. The OECD says:

“Providing father-specific leave seems to increase men’s uptake of parental leave. In Iceland and Sweden, the ‘daddy quota’ has led to a doubling in the number of parental leave days taken by men.

“It is also working in other parts of the world: In Korea—where men accounted for only 4.5 per cent of leave takers in 2014—the number of men taking leave rose more than three-fold following the introduction of a father-specific entitlement in 2007.”

What the OECD is recommending amounts to a culture change around early parenting. They point out that until more father-specific leave is introduced, employers will continue to question the legitimacy of paternal leave taken, thus deterring new fathers and so on.

It seems absurd that in 2016 the conversation about parental roles has not moved beyond a miserly two weeks leave. This matters for all sorts of reasons:

  • The gender pay gap is inextricably linked to questions of parental leave. The most recent statistics show that 54,000 women lose their jobs each year because of pregnancy discrimination. If an interviewer regards a male candidate and a female candidate as equally likely to take time off for childcare, inequalities in the hiring process are likely to be smoothed out. And because dads who take paternity leave are more likely to be involved in childcare throughout their children’s lives, workplace flexibility becomes important for everybody, not just women (who have had to fight for minimal concessions.)
  • The Women’s Equality Party points out that inequalities in expected parenting roles are defined literally from the moment of birth: “Even hospitals don’t seem to take dads seriously. Many treat new fathers and new co-parents as visitors who have to stick to visiting hours or at best sleep in a chair.”The broader consequences of this attitude are that one type of family is encouraged over others. Discrimination against gay or trans parents is entrenched through this insistence that, if you want to keep your job, you must adhere to traditional gender roles.
  • Men need to bond with their children too. The OECD’s research shows that ‘fathers who take paternity or parental leave are more likely to perform tasks such as feeding and bathing children. And this is a lasting effect: Fathers who care for children early tend to stay more involved as children grow up.’  In addition, fathers who engage more with their children tend to report greater life satisfaction and better mental and physical health. In Sweden, where there have been schemes in place to encourage shared parental leave for more than 40 years, as many as 90 per cent of new fathers take paternity leave and the gap with women is shrinking all the time; fathers clearly want to be involved.

There is a real opportunity here, to narrow inequalities between working men and women, and create flexible working environments where everybody is supported in having a healthy work/life balance. With childcare pledges from the Tories seemingly permanently stalled, it’s time for parents to have more of a say.

Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward

2 Responses to “Why it’s time for more paternity leave in the UK”

  1. David Lindsay

    Only a generation ago, a single manual wage provided the wage-earner, his wife and their several children with a quality of life unimaginable even on two professional salaries today. This impoverishment has been so rapid and so extreme that most people, including almost all politicians and commentators, simply refuse to acknowledge that it has happened. But it has indeed happened. And it is still going on.

    If fathers matter, then they must face up to their responsibilities, with every assistance, including censure where necessary, from the wider society, including when it acts politically as the State. A legal presumption of equal parenting. Restoration of the tax allowance for fathers for so long as Child Benefit is being paid to mothers. Restoration of the requirement that providers of fertility treatment take account of the child’s need for a father. Repeal of the ludicrous provision for two women to be listed as a child’s parents on a birth certificate, although even that is excelled by the provision for two men to be so listed.

    And paternity leave available at any time until the child was 18 or left school, thereby reasserting paternal authority, and thus requiring paternal responsibility, at key points in childhood and adolescence. Of course a new baby needs her mother. But a 15-year-old might very well need her father, and that bit of paternity leave that he has been owed these last 15 years.

    That authority and responsibility require an economic basis such as only the State can ever guarantee, and such as only the State can very often deliver. That basis is high-wage, high-skilled, high-status employment. All aspects of public policy must take account of this urgent social and cultural need. Not least, that includes energy policy: the energy sources to be preferred by the State are those providing the high-wage, high-skilled, high-status jobs that secure the economic basis of paternal authority in the family and in the wider community. So, nuclear power. And coal, not dole.

    Moreover, paternal authority cannot be affirmed while fathers are torn away from their children and harvested in wars. Especially, though not exclusively, since those sent to war tend to come from working-class backgrounds, where starting to have children often still happens earlier than has lately become the norm. Think of those very young men whom we see going off or coming home, hugging and kissing their tiny children.

    You can believe in fatherhood, or you can support wars under certainly most and possibly all circumstances, the latter especially in practice today even if not necessarily in the past or in principle. You cannot do both.

  2. Jimmy Glesga

    Such a moaning society that wants someone else to pay for the results off shagging and the men disappear. It wisnae me someone else shagged her

Leave a Reply