The Tories' plans are a direct attack on basic freedoms
David Cameron has chosen to make one of the first acts of his new government destroying the Human Rights Act – but Labour’s deep disappointment at the election result must not diminish our determination to oppose it from the outset.
It was British civil servants who played a key role in drafting the original European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in 1951. It was Labour Britain which was responsible for bringing these human rights home with the introduction of the Human Rights Act in 1998.
If anyone on the Labour side feels half-hearted about this battle, then it should be sufficient to remind you that the new justice secretary, appointed by David Cameron to axe the act, is none other than Michael Gove.
We helped found the Labour Campaign for Human Rights to show that this is not a legal or academic debate, but a direct attack on rights precious to the mass of people in Britain,who Labour must always represent.
The Dowler family given false hope for the life of their daughter by the actions of irresponsible journalists; the air hostess who won the right to wear the Christian cross at work; the learning-disabled people seeking protection against physical and sexual abuse hidden away in private care homes, have all won important legal victories because of human rights.
Tories want to smear the act by associating it with undermining the fight against terrorists, conveniently forgetting that the delay in extraditing Abu Hamza was less to do with the Human Rights Act, than with home secretary Theresa May’s astonishing failure to lodge the legal claim to do so within the requisite timescale.
Human Rights are about upholding the rule of law, and it is ironic the Conservative Party – which likes to portray itself as a party of law and order – is so willing to risk this.
For Labour, the defence of human rights must remain a cornerstone of our politics, and is central to the fight against discrimination in all its forms.
The Human Rights Act has been a vital tool in the fight for rights the LGBTI community. One simple example of this can be seen in the changes in UK law to allow gay members of the armed forces to be open about their sexuality.
The right to protest is sadly one which we may be forced to exercise more not less in the years ahead, and the restrictions of the miner’s strike are ready to leap off the stage of Billy Elliott back in to the politics of today.
Do our friends in the press really want to support demolition of their freedom of expression? The ruling in the European Court of Human Rights showed that forced disclosure of journalistic sources would have a chilling effect on press freedom.
Don’t we live in a better society, where local authorities, the NHS and the police have to ask themselves whether their decisions and actions might violate the fundamental rights of the people we are all supposed to serve?
And, of course, removing the HRA will mean citizens have to endure a slow judicial process at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg instead of raising cases in domestic courts – Labour’s reason for passing the act in the first place.
Tory plans for a British ‘Bill of Rights’ are hopelessly muddled, either suggesting the changes they plan are merely cosmetic, or detonating a suicide bomb against the European Convention itself.
It is further evidence that Mr Cameron is endangering both Britain’s position in Europe and the unity of the United Kingdom itself, irrespective of his protestations otherwise.
Human rights are for everyone.
None of us know when our lives might suddenly fall apart because of unreasonable actions outside our control, and when we might rely on legal protection to assert our own innocence, to protect ourselves or those who we love.
The narrative of the Conservatives is that people do not deserve rights. Let them be accused and see if they might be happy to be powerless in response. On abolition of the Human Rights Act, it is Labour who must accuse them.
Claude Moraes MEP is chair of the European Parliament Justice, Civil Liberties and Home Affairs Committee, and Richard Howitt MEP is Labour’s European spokesperson on human rights and founder member of the Labour Campaign for Human Rights
Want to read more posts like this? Then *sign-up to Look Left* and make sure you have the facts to rebut right-wing spin
30 Responses to “Labour brought human rights to the UK – now we must defend them”
wj
It was the Labour government that gave us the European Arrest Warrant that put a hobnail boot through our established system of law. It has also made our governments subservient to a supranational system of law imposed by unelected judges.
The ‘rights’ culture has silenced Free Speech and discriminated against religious conviction and the main beneficiaries have been the offended victim chasing legal parasites.
How can we expect people to bother visiting a Polling station every 5 years when the cross that they put on a piece of paper is meaningless and any law produced under any manifesto can be overruled.
RoughSleeper
Like I said to Starmer, you can’t jump on the bandwagon of the day that is most convenient to yourself, and then be taken seriously.
If you now stand up for Humans Rights & democracy, to oppose the Tories, you must also stand up against your own actions against them under ‘New’ Labour.
Or, as I said to KS: How dare you have the gall to jump on this bandwagon, for political promotion, when you were in power, directing the ‘putting on the streets’ anyone that, progressed a case to the ECHR exposing abuse of the law, and coverups?
If the behaviour of all politicians sicken us, then this must make us absolutely retch!
I was/am one of your victims.
Lets get back to ‘True’ Labour; truth; no more coverups (Westminster, or other); stating what you stand for, laws that you will pass, laws that you will repeal, before an election; State being subservient to, and obeying, democracy. Then we, the public, will have a party to believe in, and the Tories won’t have a look-in.
(8.5656 x 10K hours expertise, Boots on the ground, @ 1.5747 pence/day)
Gerschwin
This is taking the piss. Tony Blair did not get out of bed one morning and discover this thing called Human Rights. He decided UK law and UK courts were not fit for purpose for reasons known only to him but I suspect because it enablde him to define rights and thereby limit them, and inflicted this upon the UK, meantime he passed laws banning people from demonstrating outside Parliament and enabling the police to prosecute people for wearing T-shirts Blair didn’t like – what a duplicitous cretin. What Gove propose is that UK law courts and UK law are fit for purpose and that we should do this our way – and he’s absolutely right.
Selohesra
There is more to Humam Rights than the Human Rights Act. Britain is quite capable of establishing appropriate rights answerable to British courts
Cole
Yes, we really want some Bill of Rights written by the Tories. Do you think people are stupid?