Radical and bold ideas, like the energy price freeze, are popular with voters. Let’s have more of them

Contrary to some popular wisdom, after the crash public opinion is now clearly on the side of substantial government intervention.

Ed Miliband

Steve Hart is chair of the Centre for Labour and Social Studies (Class), the trade union-based Think Tank

Polling for Centre for Labour and Social studies (Class) published today in advance of our National Conference on Saturday provides encouraging news for Ed Miliband, especially on two key fronts.

Twice as many see Ed Miliband as more on the side of working people than David Cameron – by 35 per cent to 16 per cent – although 38 per cent replied neither. Miliband’s lead is important but the large ‘neither’ figure shows that a lot more needs to be done if Labour is really to convince working people it is on their side.

77 per cent respond that they are not personally benefitting from the renewed growth in the economy. Just days after the Coalition crowed about rising GDP announcements, these figures suggest that the Labour focus on living standards resonates with the public beyond current Labour supporters; 74 per cent of those who voted Tory in 2010 and 83 per cent of those who voted Lib Dem say they are not benefiting as the economy grows again.

The next election could be determined in these two sets of figures – if the Coalition fails to deliver perceived living standard growth alongside the expected GDP growth, while Labour is able to further sustain the view that it ‘is on the side of working people’, Ed Miliband could be on course for victory.

How does Labour win this argument – how does Labour consolidate the LibDem voters already won since 2010, but also win over significant numbers of thus far elusive Tory voters from the last election?

Winning a decisive majority requires both of those groups, while ensuring strong support across social classes, as well as restoring a big C2DE lead. Class would argue that bold, fearless and radical is the road to victory. New Labour-lite and triangulation provide not only the wrong policies for Britain but are more likely to lead voters in to the hands of the Coalition.

Ed Miliband at his best – and most popular – has stood up to power; to Murdoch, to ‘consensus’ over Syria, and to energy prices. His approach was right and worked well for Labour. Our conference will explore and debate realistic and radical alternatives for Labour – how it can further its already popular policies, and what other ideas it should adopt.

Contrary to some popular wisdom, after the crash public opinion is now clearly on the side of substantial government intervention. The all-conquering power of the free market seems to have lost its allure to much of the public

Our poll shows, in common with other polls, more than 7 in 10 people support price controls for gas and electricity – including 6 in 10 of those who voted Tory at the last election. We also show that more than 7 in 10 people support price controls for public transport fares, including 6 in 10 of those who voted Tory at the last election.

Voters were narrowly in favour of private sector rent  controls – 45 per cent said the government should have control over rent levels while 43 per cent disagreed – however 32 per cent of Tories, 44 per cent of Lib Dems and 50 per cent of UKIP supporters wanted  controls in this area.

There appears to be strong cross party support amongst voters for defence and extension of the public sector.

84 per cent want the NHS to stay in the public sector and only 7 per cent support privatisation. 67 per cent say the Royal mail should be in the public sector, 66 per cent say Rail Companies should be in the public sector. 68 per cent say energy companies should be in the public sector. A majority of current Tory supporters – 52 per cent – think both rail and energy should be in the public sector rather than private sector.

Far from being a vote loser, nationalisation is popular!

Disenchantment with the market probably is clear from  views of the banking crash – 65 per cent are ‘not confident that enough has been done to avoid another banking crash like 2008 happening in the future’, including 58 per cent of Tory supporters.

So Ed Miliband is making important progress, but has yet to convince many. Our poll gives confidence that more radical and bold ideas, just like the energy price freeze, are popular with many current supporters of other parties, and point to the best way forward. This is emphatically not a narrow core vote strategy, but the road to a popular majority.

Class is holding its first National Conference (open to all) at TUC Congress House, London on Saturday 2 November with 60 speakers including Frances O’Grady, Polly Toynbee, Angela Eagle MP, Tom Watson MP, a gaggle of TU General Secretaries, and leading academics and commentators

4 Responses to “Radical and bold ideas, like the energy price freeze, are popular with voters. Let’s have more of them”

  1. MissScarIett

    This piece reads like you wrote it without any conviction at all. This is number-crunching nonsense; focus group politics.

    Are we bold enough, as the Labour party, to come up with ideas and put them in front of people first? You seem, again, to be saying, ‘Let’s look at what opinion polls tell us people will vote for, cost it and put it in the manifesto.’ What do we want? A big C2DE lead! When do we want it? After Ed Miliband has convinced the voters of the arguments!

    What happened to Labour policies for social justice, that protect the weakest and keep the economy safe and fair enough to deliver for them? I really hope tomorrow’s conference puts people like you in their place.

  2. Chris

    did Matthew Hancock, George Osborne’s close ally, switch to ecotricity because of their anti-fracked gas policy or pro-green investment policy

  3. treborc1

    This really is like a child writing about a friend or a school teacher they like.

    Capping gas and electricity at the top end of the price hike if people are struggling now imagine with another twenty months capped at the top and if the price drops capping it means it will he held high. But Cameron says we must bring in more competition so does Miliband so why do you need a cap, but competition was the idea behind selling it into the private sector and like all the others which have been flogged off it failed.

    Syria well of course Miliband idea was to wait for the inspectors they reported now, so really Miliband should be telling us now what he thinks, should we go in or not, but it does not matter now Cameron has said no.

    Of course in Miliband first ever speech he fell over him self telling us Blair was a hero and he was right about so much, clause 4 Blair was right to get rid of it. but of course labour thought nationalization of the banks was great idea , rumour has it he now think the Railways should be brought in house.

    Yes so Blair was also right then to try and flog off the royal mail the Post office the Royal Mint and the NHS no mention of this of course.

    The fact is if Miliband gets back in he may well drop the manifesto as Blair did and decide the NHS may be better with UNUM Provident which of course helps labour a lot these days.

    The real problem for Labour is this, we will stick with the Tories spending plans, we will cap benefits at 1% and we will cap wages for the poorest workers in the public sector at 1%.

    Labour Tory take your pick, Tories have to get the welfare bill down, Labour will hammer the welfare bill.

    one takes your pick.

  4. swatnan

    Here’s a post Conference comment: An excellent Conference, bringing together Labour, the Unions and related organisations of the Left. Its the sort of forum that we need and will question academics theorists and practitioners. Lots of new ideas thrown up. We should not be apologising for taxes, its taxes that deliver good service. And the Unions should be looking closely how to recruit more members and representing them better, we need to go back to collective bargaining, have a Minister for Labour and Wages Council; maybe a Prices and Incomes Board instead of the scramble that goes on at the moment. But some of the alternatives to Price Freezes, Levies and increased Taxation, easy to propose, need to be teased out and spelt out. Its pretty pointless making proposals without saying How. And thats what CLASS as a Think Tank should be engaged in. First Class Conference; lets see more follow ups.

Leave a Reply