The Premier League's owners’ and directors’ test does not prohibit those complicit in acts of torture, slavery, human trafficking or war crimes.
Human rights groups have accused Saudi authorities of “sportwashing” their human rights record as Newcastle United Football Club is taken over a Saudi Arabian investment fund.
The £305 million takeover of the club by the Public Investment Fund went through on Thursday after the deal passed the Premier League owners’ and directors’ test.
The takeover was approved by the Premier League after it received “legally binding assurances” that the Saudi state would not be in control of the club.
But human rights groups have slammed the deal, saying that it is an attempt by Saudi authorities to clean up their image in relation to human rights abuses.
Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK’s CEO, said: “Ever since this deal was first talked about we said it represented a clear attempt by the Saudi authorities to sportswash their appalling human rights record with the glamour of top-flight football.
“Saudi ownership of St James’ Park was always as much about image management for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and his government, as it was about football.
Deshmukh called the human rights situation in Saudi Arabia “dire”, adding that government critics, women’s rights campaigners, Shia activists and human defenders are still being harassed and jailed, often after “blatantly unfair” trials.
He said: “The closed-door trial of Jamal Khashoggi’s alleged killers was widely perceived to be a part of a wider whitewash by the authorities, and Saudi Arabia is accused of a catalogue of crimes under international humanitarian law during the long-running conflict in Yemen.”
Amnesty International UK has run a long campaign to update the Premier League owners’ and directors’ test.
In August 2020, the group wrote to Premier League boss Richard Masters with a proposed update.
The human rights group’s legal analysis showed that the league’s current owners’ and directors’ test has numerous serious shortcomings, including the fact that the test bars someone on the sex offenders register from becoming an owner or director, but does not prohibit those complicit in acts of torture, slavery, human trafficking or even war crimes.
Deshmukh said: “Instead of allowing those implicated in serious human rights violations to walk into English football simply because they have deep pockets, we’ve urged the Premier League to change their owners’ and directors’ test to address human rights issues.
“The phrase ‘human rights’ doesn’t even appear in the owners’ and directors’ test despite English football supposedly adhering to FIFA standards. We’ve sent the Premier League a suggested new human rights-compliant test and we reiterate our call on them to overhaul their standards on this.”
Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch, also condemned the deal.
She told Reuters: “This is against the backdrop of a strategy by Saudi Arabia to use sports teams, athletes and major sporting events in the country to distract from its national human rights crises.”
“Given the Saudi Arabian government’s poor human rights record, this is a wake-up call to fans, broadcasters and players that sports should not be a tool for erasing human rights abuse.”
Alexandra Warren is a freelance journalist.
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.