'I think GB news, when it launched, was actually a very, very shoddy platform. When it came out it was embarrassing to watch.'
Andrew Neil was criticized on BBC Question Time last night and accused of using ‘dog whistles’ to attract viewers to GB News, in his first media appearance since he quit the controversial channel.
The former BBC journalist appeared on the programme to explain his decision for leaving GB News, after he played a pivotal role in setting it up, promising at the time to ‘change the face of news and debate in the UK’. A mere two weeks after the launch, which was hit by a number of controversies, including technical problems, Covid conspiracies and advertising boycotts to name but a few, Neil went on leave and never returned.
He has since resigned as chairman and quit as a presenter. GB News has been likened to Fox News in America, and Neil was keen to distance himself from Fox last night, saying he had always made it clear the GB News wouldn’t be like Fox News which ‘deals in untruths, it deals in conspiracy theories and it deals in fake news and that’s not my kind of journalism’. However, when pushed by presenter Fiona Bruce if that was the reason why he left GB News, Neil said people could draw their own conclusions.
Yet he faced strong criticism from writer and co-founder of the Black Writers Guild Nels Abbey who brought out a picture of Neil next to a quote from the former BBC journalist, that said: “Why Britain’s new TV news channel won’t be woke.”
Abbey pointed to the picture and said to Neil: “GB News was set up, as it says over here in black and white and a channel that was intended to not be ‘woke’, that it was going to be a channel that was going to fight the ‘culture wars’.
“I posit to you, Andrew, that you actually knew exactly what you guys were setting up. That you were setting when you use the term like woke as a pejorative. I put it to you that you knew exactly the dog that you were blowing the whistle at.”
Neil said to Abbey in reply: “You don’t know me and you are assuming things of which you have no knowledge whatsoever.”
Abbey added: “I think GB news, when it launched, was actually a very, very shoddy platform. When it came out it was embarrassing to watch.
“It’s not Fox News by any means. Fox News actually has very, very decent production value and very well thought through programming.
“GB news is by no means whatsoever Fox News, it is actually a very inferior product to almost anything on the market.
“But what we actually had, what GB News did represent is the exact same thing that Fox News represented, which was for the purpose of re-mainstreaming and maintaining an almost cocktail of bigotries within our nation, under the term ‘woke’.”
Basit Mahmood is co-editor of Left Foot Forward
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.