When did he learn his phone would be searched?
Jolyon Maugham QC is Director of Good Law Project.
Last week in Court, we argued against the government’s attempts to apply blanket redactions to documents relating to the Abingdon Health contracts for rapid antibody tests (which were later found to be less effective than claimed). We were successful – an important step towards transparency.
Lord Bethell is the Health Minister responsible for overseeing the award of Covid contracts. His time as Health Minister has been mired in controversy: from failing to declare meetings with firms that won huge government contracts, to using his personal email address to conduct government business. Good Law Project has a particular interest in the role he played in the controversial award of lucrative contracts to Abingdon Health.
But the hearing uncovered something more alarming. In sworn evidence, government admitted that some of Lord Bethell’s dealings with Abingdon had been conducted via WhatsApp or text message, and were held only on his private mobile phone. If that was the case for Abingdon, why not other VIPs too?
What’s more, in December last year, Lord Bethell (pictured) was told his mobile phone would be searched for documents relating to this case. Just weeks later, it seems, he ‘replaced’ his phone because, government lawyers say, it was ‘broken’. They are now not sure it will be possible to retrieve the WhatsApp and text messages.
Lord Bethell has overseen the awarding of billions of pounds of public contracts. Information revealing how these contracts came to be awarded may now be lost – or even destroyed.
During the hearing, the Judge expressed alarm about the government’s failure to preserve evidence and insisted the ‘Order’ he made at the conclusion of the hearing refer to the government’s obligation to preserve relevant documents.
Our lawyers have written to the government to demand answers. When did Bethell learn his phone would be searched? When did he report it as broken? What attempts were made to save crucial information from his old phone? If none, why not?
This government seems allergic to scrutiny: redacting some documents, hiding others from public scrutiny via ‘confidentiality rings’, permitting Ministers to award billions in public money via private, as well as official, channels, and failing to protect evidence from destruction. We are taking action to close this accountability gap.
It is only with your support that we can continue to hold government to account. If you would like to make a donation to Good Law Project, you can do so here.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 117 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.