Inside the creation of a new tech workers' union.
Simon Sapper is a trade unionist and host of the UnionDues podcast.
In the latest UnionDues podcast – available from midday today – we look at the work of the newly-formed Union of Tech and Allied Workers, UTAW for short, in conversation with reps John Chadfield and Mark Storm.
John explains how the union grew out of the London chapter of the Tech Workers Coalition when people with no union background started turning up in increasing numbers at their meetings – and all with similar concerns that employers were failing to address. As John says: “Mental health issues are not dealt with by a three month subscription to a Wellness app. and HR aren’t going to look after you the way you think they are.”
It also became clear that on key occupational issues such as data protection, UTAW members were uniquely placed to offer a view. “If it’s not us, who’s going to look at it, who’s going to represent the views of workers? Who’s more credible to talk about this than trade unionists from a tech background?” he told UnionDues.
But the creation of UTAW as a union structure was only completed by the partnership with CWU. Dave Ward was, says John, the only General Secretary – out of a number who were asked – to come to branch meetings to discuss how a tie-up might work. He describes how the [CWU] NEC really understood our concerns – ‘partly because they were already thinking along similar lines to us.’
In the last year UTAW has grown from zero to nearly 1000 members, and the plan is to triple that over the next year as well as targeting a number of recognition deals. “The biggest job is translating a union and its benefits for a generation that doesn’t understand what they are,” John says. It’s something that clearly applies to employers as well as members, given a proliferation of employee contracts loaded with US legal references that are clearly unenforceable in the UK.
You can find out more about UTAW, including how to join, here. Each issue raised could have been its own show.
Who is a tech worker? It’s a fascinating and vital question which John raises. Is it just developers, programmers and analysts who work for Microsoft or Google? Or is it everyone who depends on tech for their work like Deliveroo riders, or people who use online agency services like The Waiting Game platform? And what does that mean for union organising strategies?
Then there’s the proliferation of unions working in the tech space. As well as UTAW, there’s Prospect, Unite, Community, NUJ, the Game Workers Union (part of the IWGB family) and the TCU Creators Union. In fairness there is room for everyone given the still-low number of members – but some sort of joined up approach would seem to make sense.
John and Mark also touched on the differences between pathways to recognition in the US and UK. I’m really not going to dive into that one here and now, but the legal framework for union recognition really does make a big difference in recruitment strategies.
And finally, there’s the whole idea of flexible union structures. For example, since the creation of the CWU in 1995, it has had national branch structures for not just UTAW but Postmasters and members working for the old Alliance and Leicester group. The adaptability of union structures – or not – can have a profound impact on alliances, partnerships, mergers and growth.
This time round, we also get to grips with what homeworking will look like post-pandemic, as the Labour Research Department launches its negotiators’ guide to the subject.
And in her #thought4theweek, Glasgow University Professor of Work and Employment Mel Simms considers the challenges facing younger workers as we emerge from lockdown,
And LFF’s very own Josiah Mortimer previews the Radical Roundup of union news stories you probably won’t see in the national mainstream media.
You can access this and all episodes here.
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.