Low-paid workers could be forced to pay government’s legal fees in ‘vindictive’ case

Labour's John McDonnell is among those backing a crowdfunder after precarious workers look set to be landed with significant legal debts.

In October, three precarious workers – Maritza, Wilson and Alex – teamed up with the IWGB union to force the government to abide by the law and seek a Brexit extension – after Boris Johnson suggested he would breach the Benn Act and lurch Britain into a ‘no deal’ scenario.

Instead, Johnson broke his own pledge to ‘die in a ditch’ rather than seek an extension, making the case moot.

The migrant workers say they faced a terrible prospect: ‘stand up to Boris Johnson and his threats of a no-deal Brexit, or face the risk of having some of their most basic rights stripped away’, the IWGB union said.

The workers are now crowdfunding to cover their legal fees – and have nearly reached their target.

A few days after the High Court claim was submitted, Boris Johnson went back on his commitment and agreed with the European Union to move the deadline to 31 January. The workers withdrew their claim, but now, the IWGB say government lawyers are arguing that because the claim was withdrawn, the claimants are liable to cover the government’s legal costs of at least £8,000.

The case stemmed from the fact that a no-deal Brexit would have put many workers’ rights at risk – potentially including the many employment rights that are based in EU law.

The IWGB has brought a number of high-profile cases which rely on EU law, including a £1m holiday pay claim against NHS contractor The Doctors Laboratory (TDL).

The grassroots union argue the three precarious workers are now being ‘punished’ by the government for having the temerity to take a stand.

Claimant Maritza Castillo Calle said:

“Precarious migrant workers like myself have been terrified by the prospect of a no-deal Brexit and the impact it could have on our most basic rights. We decided to take action to protect our communities, but now because Boris Johonson lied about his intention to not seek an extension, we are being asked to pay thousands of pounds. By handing us this bill, it’s clear that this government for the rich is trying to intimidate ourselves and other working class people from ever daring to hold it to account.”

An IWGB spokesperson added: “This attempt to intimidate those that try and challenge the government is in line with the Conservative party’s proposed manifesto pledge to explore changes to the judicial review process, which many fear will further limit ordinary citizens’ ability to challenge government policies.”

Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell backed the crowdfunder to cover the claimants’ legal costs:

“This crowdfunder goes to the heart of why Boris is unfit to be Prime Minister. The PM lied, low paid workers and their union bravely took action to hold him to account, the PM backtracked, and is now vindictively pursuing them for legal costs. Low paid workers standing up for their rights and the rule of law need to be supported, not attacked.”

The IWGB recently raised over £2,000 to help house Mike Hutchinson, who was allegedly ‘sacked’ at a Royal Mail subsidiary shortly after he spoke out about ‘gig’ economy conditions at ‘gig economy’ firm Ecourier.

Josiah Mortimer is Editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

7 Responses to “Low-paid workers could be forced to pay government’s legal fees in ‘vindictive’ case”

  1. Patrick Newman

    The matter resolved itself and the government lawyers could be instructed to halt the action – yes it is vindictiveness!

  2. Janet Hodge

    If you take court action you are liable for costs if you withdraw or lose -the rules of the game. There were other court actions tp make him seek an extension. In any event he had a deal prior to 31st Oct. Then the Cooper Letwin amendment re-defined no deal to mean no trade deal. PM always said he would obey the law. If take unnecessary court case you deserve what you get. The taxpayer should not pay the costs. Think before you act.

  3. Alan Bond

    So, this PM said he would always obey the law – well, he LIED like he always does. This snidey little b*****d needs to get his comeuppance at the earliest opportunity as he CANNOT be trusted ! The tories treat ALL workers as dispensible and have never been any different because they are a bunch of right wing extremists.

  4. Joe

    If you cannot stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

    The taxpayer must not be left with the debt of these irresponsible people. They should pay up or go to jail.

  5. Alice Aforethought

    @ Alan Bond

    You just don’t do self-awareness, do you?

  6. Alice Aforethought

    Sorry, whose “vindictive case” was this again? The government brought it, did they? Oh, wait:

    “In October, three precarious workers – Maritza, Wilson and Alex – teamed up with the IWGB union to force the government to abide by the law and seek a Brexit extension”

    Stupid is as stupid does. Bitches pay.

  7. Patrick Newman

    AA if you are female you are a very strange creature!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.