Labour cannot hope to win back these voters if it fixates on a tiring debate about Brexit versus Corbyn.
A tedious and reductive debate has been underway since the exit poll first dropped at 10 pm last night.
Is it Brexit or Corbyn that is to blame for Labour’s biggest defeat since 1935? The leadership’s script sought to pass the blame solely onto Brexit while moderates pointed to Corbyn’s unprecedented unpopularity with voters and the stories from the doorstep of disdain for Labour’s leader.
The truth is that both have an element of truth to them yet neither provide a full explanation of Labour’s failure to win a majority at the fourth time of asking. The problem runs far deeper than Corbynism although his period at the helm of the party has clearly exacerbated existing trends.
In examining the Brexit argument, it is clear that Labour lost most badly in Leave seats while it picked up Putney in wealthy Remainia. Yet across the country, Labour’s vote share fell in both Leave and Remain areas: by 10.4% in strong Leave areas and a more modest 6.4% in strong Remain areas. The victory in Putney owes more to a dramatic collapse in the Tory vote than anything else.
The biggest problem for Labour on Brexit was that its eventual position did not bear scrutiny and left Labour’s front benchers squirming whenever they were confronted – unable to say whether they would support a revised deal or Remain when they put the choice to the country. What was needed was a clearer position, confidently defended.
On leadership, Corbyn’s numbers were truly atrocious. On the eve of the election, just 29% of voters thought that he would make the most capable Prime Minister, down 7 percentage points on where he had got to in 2019. If voters were willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that summer, they were not now. As Nick Cohen wrote last night:
“A vast poll of 12,000 voters, released tonight, showed Jeremy Corbyn was by far the single biggest reason voters gave for deserting Labour. Of those who voted Labour in 2017 but were less than 50 per cent less likely to vote Labour now, Deltapoll found the overwhelming reason people gave was they ‘don’t like Jeremy Corbyn’ with 46 per cent agreeing with that blunt statement.”
But there is a bigger issue, beyond the short-term issues of Brexit and Corbyn: the long-term decline in Labour’s support among working class voters. At the high water-mark in 1997, Labour had 59% support among DE voters and a healthy 38 point lead over the Conservatives. Both these figures have fallen at almost every subsequent general election. Yes, there was a small upward blip in 2017 but Labour’s performance with that group is now worse than it has ever been.
Ipsos MORI’s eve of election poll which predicted a 42%-34% lead for the Conservatives, shows the Tories leading in every social class including, for the first time in a general election, those from social class DE.
If the party does anything during its “period of reflection” it must understand how it can win back its working class voters. What are these communities most worried about and what can be done to allay those fears? Which of its shopping list of policies genuinely appeal and which are seen as fantasy? And most crucially, which of the roster of potential future leaders most resonates with this group of voters?
Labour’s task is unenviable. Like most social democratic and democratic socialist parties it is struggling to knit together a coalition of university graduates in cities and working class voters in former industrial areas. But it cannot hope to win back these voters if it fixates on a tiring debate about Brexit versus Corbyn.
Will Straw is the founder of Left Foot Forward
11 Responses to “Labour’s “period of reflection” must be deeper than Brexit versus Corbyn”
Julia Gibb
I am an activist for the SNP. 17 of the 20 activists I was working with last week were once in the Labour Party. We all agreed that the Labour manifesto was a good one ( we would it copied most of the SNP policies). My point is that Scotland remains a mainly socialist country. The Brexit Party and UKIP have never gained any traction here. Not one of the team would ever consider voting Tory. The problem was not Corbyn or the manifesto it was that England has become isolationist.
I know Labour diehards will not listen but please look at the evidence:
Northern Ireland now as more non Unionist MPs for the first time and a clear desire to remain in the EU.
Scotland is on a clear path to Independence.
The Scottish Labour Party could recover to tomorrow. It could easily be a political force. All they have to do is become a Scottish Party. Support Independence. Reject WMD and Imperial force projection.
The English Labour Party are finished and I see no route to recovery. The electorate are moving to the Right and in a decade it will be two Rightwing Parties arguing who is the most extreme.
I do feel for you and you would be made welcome in Scotland if you decide to come.
Joe
Corbyn’s past support for IRA and islamic terrorist groups did not go down well at all.
The Labour leader should in future be pro-British and be supportive of British culture and national heritage.
Charlie Browne
I suspect it was the policy of unrestricted E.U. immigration ‘as a start’ ; or words to that effect, that lost Labour the election
Speaking to friends, we felt that Len McClusky had it right
Immigration into our overcrowded country, Islamist expansion, climate crisis, Zionism, and world over-population being the great threats we have coming towards us, forming a potential ‘perfect storm’
Regards
Julia Gibb
The one I never understood was Corbyn (and his tribe) supporting movements around the World seeking self determination. From Ireland through the Middle East to South America. However he opposed Scottish Independence with vigour?
Richard Leonard ( the current branch leader) states that he will not concede that the SNP have a mandate to request a Referendum.
Richard Leonard has a solution to Scotland having more Pandas than Labour MPs. He is going to request that we send a Panda back to China.
Start listening!!!
Patrick Newman
Great manifesto but more of a 10 year programme. Corbyn – more of an Attlee style PM candidate than Tony Blair but unlike the latter subject to a historically intense campaign of character assassination and vilification on a virtually daily basis by the national press, a PLP containing members who never accepted the decision of the Party on the leader and made their views known to the press throughout Corbyn’s leadership, a leaders office that always seemed to be caught in the headlights of unexpected events and adverse publicity, particularly the appalling managed hostile anti-Semitism campaign, a shadow team that often seemed unprepared for media interviews. Publicity? Well let’s contrast the billiant picture of bulldozer crashing through a Brexit ‘wall’ driven by Boris with the Seventies image of Corbyn addressing loyal supporters with mike in hand! Many lessons to be learnt!