“Energy in the 21st century needs to be clean, green and decentralised. Public ownership is the only way we can achieve this," say campaigners.
The Labour party is planning to bring the National Grid and regional energy distribution companies into public ownership, according to reports.
A leak in the Times reveals that compensation to the energy companies would be decided by parliament, ‘which could make deductions for factors such as “the state of repair of assets and state subsidies given to the energy companies’, rather than the face value of the existing shares and assets.
Energy companies slammed the leaked proposals. But the public ownership campaign We Own It welcomed the plans.
Labour’s 2017 manifesto said: “We will transform our energy systems, investing in new, state of-the-art low-carbon gas and renewable electricity production’. The party pledged to #ensure that 60 per cent of the UK’s energy comes from zero-carbon or renewable sources by 2030.
The manifesto had already hinted at nationalising the National Grid, saying: “[We will] regain control of energy supply networks through the alteration of operator license conditions, and transition to a publicly owned, decentralised energy system.”
The leaked policy announcement appears to be confirmation of these plans.
Justin Bowden, GMB National Secretary, told LFF:
“This is a big and bold announcement. Returning energy networks to where any natural monopoly belongs – under public ownership – is a great first step and should be quickly followed by announcements on domestic gas and electricity supply.
“Any credible energy policy must be affordable to consumers and taxpayers, guarantee security of supply and increasingly rely on zero and very low carbon sources like nuclear, green hydrogen gas and wind as part of a balance energy mix.”
Cat Hobbs, director of campaign group We Own It said:
“It’s absolutely brilliant that Labour is committing to bring our energy network into public ownership.
“The National Grid is a natural monopoly. We have no choice but to use it, or the regional private monopolies who deliver energy to our homes.
“Right now, profits are lining the pockets of shareholders. Under public ownership we can reinvest that money in bringing down bills, upgrading infrastructure and connecting community renewable energy projects to the grid.
“Energy in the 21st century needs to be clean, green and decentralised. Public ownership is the only way we can achieve this.”
It is understood that a new public body would govern the grid, making green investment a key focus.
Currently, energy networks are owned by several different private companies. Just 11.5% of these are based in the UK, while 47% of the energy network is owned by US companies, and 38% of gas distribution is owned by Chinese companies, according to research.
Analysis from Citizens Advice estimates that the national grid and energy distribution companies have extracted around £1 billion a year in profits, which could have been used to reduce energy bills.
Josiah Mortimer is Editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
3 Responses to “LEAK: Labour is planning to nationalise the National Grid”
Tom Sacold
They won’t be able to nationalise it if we remain in the EU under the Single Market regulations !!!
Patrick Newman
Mr Sacold, quote the regulations which prevent the UK from re-nationalisation of the electricity infrastructure. Outside the EU the Americans will tell us they won’t allow it if we want a trade deal.
There will be no progress on Green energy policies while we are burdened by this faux market and pretend competition for energy supply.
Patrick Newman
The chaotic pretend energy market is predicated on enabling consumers to get the lowest price for their energy. What interpretation of Green policies can possibly sustain this approach or for that matter continuing with a 5% VAT rate for energy?