We shouldn’t praise the Tories for resettling 8,000 Syrian refugees

Not only is this far too few, it is also a distraction from the numerous other ways in which the Government is letting refugees down.

The UNHCR has praised the British Government for letting 8,000 Syrian refugees into the UK as part of a resettlement scheme launched three years ago – in response to immense public pressure.

The programme, which is supposed to help another 12,000 people before it ends in 2020, was described as “truly transformative” by the United Nations body.

But many, including Green Party co-leader Jonathan Bartley, have said the Tories should accept thousands more.

In August the UN said Britain needed to at least double the number of refugees it takes under resettlement schemes if it was to ‘step up’ to the refugee crisis.

In a statement, Bartley said today:

“The Government will no doubt pat itself on the back for these latest figures but the truth is Britain is still not taking its fair share of Syrian refugees. Britain could and should shelter thousands more people fleeing war and persecution in Syria.

“We are living through the worst refugee crisis on record. As well as resettling refugees from the camps in Syria the Government must do more to help those who have made perilous journeys to get here, especially lone children.”

In February, the Tories reneged on their commitment to resettle unaccompanied child refugees, having taken in just 350 young people under the Dubs scheme.

No children have been resettled from Greece or Italy, where more than 8,000 unaccompanied asylum-seeking children have registered over the past year.

Charities say this has left vulnerable children stranded in Europe, at risk of trafficking and sexual abuse.

Bartley said of the scheme:

“It is inexcusable that Ministers have still not fulfilled their promise to take in 450 lone child refugees under the Dubs Scheme. These children are vulnerable to trafficking and abuse and we have a duty to help them.”

Even looking beyond the tendency of resettlement schemes to be inadequate and suspended before completion, provisions for refugees who do arrive in the UK are inadequate and the treatment of asylum seekers – particularly those who are not from Syria – is cruel, unjust and dehumanising.

Under the Tory government, LGBT asylum seekers who face death and torture in their country of origin have been forced to ‘prove’ their sexuality by showing photographs and videos of sex with their partners in court.

Survivors of torture, trafficking and sexual abuse are among the hundreds locked up indefinitely in detention centres around the country, where report after report show suicide attempts, self harm and deteriorating mental health to be the norm.

Outside of detention, migrants, including asylum seekers, are often left destitute and in limbo while their claims are processed over the course of months or years.

Theresa May’s ‘hostile environment’ for migrants is also hitting refugees and asylum seekers hard, as it becomes more and more difficult to access basic services like healthcare and housing and even to open a bank account without a British passport.

Zoom out a little more and with Tory rhetoric blaming immigration for austerity scarcity and cuts to services, it is no surprise Britain is becoming more racist. Hate crime has soared since the Brexit vote, and attacks are indiscriminate with refugees and asylum seekers often targeted.

Given this, praising the government for one inadequate scheme designed to stop the public from complaining is unhelpful. The scheme is a cynical distraction from the numerous other ways in which the Tories are letting refugees down. Praising it won’t encourage them to do more, it will let them get away with doing less.

Charlotte England is a freelance journalist and writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

3 Responses to “We shouldn’t praise the Tories for resettling 8,000 Syrian refugees”

  1. Mike Stallard

    “children” “vulnerable children”

    I am just asking have you ever met any of these people? The ones who came to my English classes, brought by their mentors in UK as Syrian refugees were all (except for a Kurd and a real Syrian) African men who told me which country they came from and who had their own personal mobile phones. One by one they disappeared into London.
    Please will you do your homework before you fill our capital with young, very able, very joined up warriors?

  2. Dave Roberts

    Yes Mike, the nationality, gender and ages of the all of the many photos I have seen tend to bear you out. Overwhelmingly and obviously sub Saharan African adults and young men. Non seem emaciated and all have had the necessary means to fund their journey.
    I don’t expect a reply from the writer as I have never had one before from any of the contributors on this blog but how about a reply to this and Mike’s contribution? Also, just how many Syrian refugees should we take and what do you think an ideal number is? Just asking!

  3. Jimmy Glesga

    Islamic fascists fucked up their own countries now they come to Britain with the same fascist message. Keep them out let them kill at home.

Comments are closed.