The prime minister had fair warning on police cuts
Austerity’s chickens are coming home to roost.
In the final days of this general election campaign, Theresa May wants to trumpet her supposed commitment to keeping Britain secure. She wants to accuse Jeremy Corbyn of taking the side of terrorists and opposing legislation to keep Britons safe.
But instead, she’s facing an onslaught of questions about why she, in her six years as home secretary, presided over extensive cuts to the police service, reducing the number of officers and seriously undermining neighbourhood policing. The public are looking for answers and, rightly, are demanding that the prime minister — who has done more to shape policing in Britain today than any other politician — answer her fair share of questions.
We all know the PM doesn’t like scrutiny, she doesn’t like having her policies questioned. That’s why she’s refused to take part in any televised debates during this election campaign. But on police cuts, it’s not like she didn’t have fair warning.
In 2015, the Police Federation — which represents 120,000 of the nation’s officers — warned the then-home secretary that ‘cuts have consequences’. Indeed, that was the theme of their annual conference, at which May spoke.
But instead of taking their concerns seriously, and bringing them back to cabinet, she delivered a blunt rebuke, accusing the federation of scaremongering.
Here is the key section of the speech:
“I know that the theme of this year’s Police Federation conference is “cuts have consequences”. I know too that delivering more with less can be challenging and difficult.
Over the past five years, we have had to make some tough and difficult decisions. We have reformed your pay and pensions, reduced police spending, and yes, there are fewer officers overall. But – despite the predictions of the Federation, and despite the predictions of the politicians who wanted to sell you a false dream of ever more spending – crime is down by more than a quarter since 2010, according to the independent Crime Survey for England and Wales.
This weekend, the Federation warned that spending reductions mean that we’ll be “forced to adopt a paramilitary style” of policing in Britain. Today, you’ve said that neighbourhood police officers are an “endangered species”. I have to tell you that this kind of scaremongering does nobody any good – it doesn’t serve you, it doesn’t serve the officers you represent, and it doesn’t serve the public.”
“So please – for your sake and for the thousands of police officers who work so hard every day – this crying wolf has to stop.”
This is a classic Tory approach to dispute resolution — lecture rather than listen to those who understand what your policies are doing. It has its mirror image in Jeremy Hunt’s refusal to listen to the warnings of NHS staff. The Tories are so committed to their ideological austerity project that they refuse to accept dissent, even from those who are seeing the consequences on the front line.
As home secretary, May made a choice to pursue the cuts agenda against the advice of police officers. She must now accept that choices — like cuts — have consequences.
Niamh Ni Mhaoileoin is editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter.Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today.