Should exams be rescheduled so Muslims can fast for Ramadan?

Religious freedom must be considered in the light of children's well-being

 

Will this year’s GCSE and A-Level examinations be rescheduled to accommodate fasting Muslim students during Ramadan?

As the Islamic calendar is a lunar one, Ramadan shifts slightly each year, meaning Muslims will be fasting from June to July this year. Pupils in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will sit GCSEs and A-levels between May 16 and June 29 this year.

The Joint Council for Qualifications, which represents exam boards, said it had held discussions with Muslim leaders about the timetabling of exams this summer, but a report in the Guardian late on Thursday suggested that there had been some misunderstandings.

The council said the timing of Ramadan had been considered in the same way as other events – such as the Queen’s diamond jubilee in June 2012 – and that the timetable was not open to change. I expect more details will emerge in due course.

What has interested me, however, is the response of some people who believe this is a good way of accommodating fasting students.

The potential rescheduling of exams is not as important to me as the fact that we are not talking about mature adults who can make an informed choice, but children upon whom there is no obligation to fast, as well as encouraging them at a very young age to fast as soon as possible.

That these are young children depriving themselves of food and water seems to go largely unsaid. If non-Muslim children were to deprive themselves of food and drink for nearly 20 hours each day for a month, I suspect the response would be different.

Last year, there was uproar when a headteacher of the Lion Academy Trust – which runs four schools in London –  advised parents to tell their children not to fast as it could be harmful. Instead of support, the decision was criticised by certain Muslim groups, saying it was not the school’s place to interfere.

Brushing aside the ironic fact that some of these groups try to interfere in the lives of Muslims, when did it come to this? Instead of praising children and parents for showing so much devotion to their religion, better time and energy would be spent on schools and these ‘faith leaders’ – assuming they influence the people they claim to represent – on telling parents and the wider communities to encourage their children not to fast.

If headteachers are truly concerned over the ‘negative effects’ that a clash between Ramadan and exams could have, then they should follow the example of the aforementioned headteacher.

Coming from a Muslim background, I appreciate that sense of unity one feels during Ramadan, knowing your fellow Muslims are all fasting and feeling hungry and tired, and perhaps you will all share a meal together at sunset.

But this should not come at the expense of a child’s health and well-being. If they really wish to fast then they should make up for it when they do not have exams or when they are off school.

Schools should not be making too many concessions in the name of religion – who knows where this will lead to and what the next issue will be.

Iram Ramzan is a freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter

47 Responses to “Should exams be rescheduled so Muslims can fast for Ramadan?”

  1. Comrade Darling

    I am not sure if you are right there, but clearly I never swept it under the carpet as I raised the point. I will try never to ignore and always criticise what I feel deserves criticism. My fear is that in a growing mood of islamaphobia then every criticism will feed into the frenzy so ask yourself when making public comments how the criticism is couched.

    These are dangerous times and leading to the 6th February the right clearly hope to capitalise on the rising tide of anti Muslim sentiments on a European level, these are times when the question ‘which side are you on’ becomes more pronounced and stark.

  2. steroflex

    As I see it, society is not just a mass of individuals, but an organic whole. I am expected to agree that divorce is just a lifestyle choice. I am expected to smile at gay marriage. I am expected to teach the boys who are destroyed by their parents’ divorces. I am expected to agree. If I say anything, it is very unacceptable. I do not agree with your comment therefore. If you believe something – anything – outside the mainstream than you stand a very real risk of ostracism.

  3. steroflex

    Oddly enough, religion is not about right and wrong and judgement as much as hoping, trusting, risking. If you believe in a God who cares desperately about you and your fellow human beings and who is there to help and protect, then that is lovely and it makes you happy. It also binds you to the most unlikely people.
    Education is imposing – rather offering – your beliefs. At the moment in most state schools religion of all stripes is more or less banned. That is making a very bold assumption in my opinion.
    Let’s leave all the emotive language – cloning, in their own image, need shall we?

  4. Brien

    I repeat – you do not have that right!

    When this becomes a shooting war, then you will be considered a collaborator, and a traitor to your nation.
    I, too, have, up to this present cohort, defended and encouraged multi-culturalism.
    This group from the ME is opposed to multi-culturalism.
    You have deluded yourself so badly that you no longer can see the course of actual events, and the danger to our society.

Comments are closed.