Only Westerners are allowed to talk about Syria
The Stop the War Coalition (StWC) have been accused of preventing victims of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad from speaking at an anti-war event.
During a panel event on Monday evening to discuss the case against British military intervention in Syria, StWC included no Syrians on the speaker’s panel and reportedly refused to allow Syrians to speak from the floor.
The meeting was chaired by Labour MP Diane Abbott and featured chair of the Stop the War coalition Andrew Murray, former leader of the Green Party Caroline Lucas, Labour MP Catherine West, Tory MP Crispin Blunt MP and SNP MP Tommy Shephard.
According to human rights activist Peter Tatchell, who attended the event, no Syrians were included on the panel and the Syrian activists who turned up to the event were threatened with arrest.
Speaking to LFF, Tatchell said:
“Some Syrian victims of Assad’s brutalities turned up but were not allowed to speak. They eventually shouted out in frustration, turning the meeting into momentary chaos, as they were jeered by some of the audience and as StWC stewards tried to eject them – allegedly threatening that they’d be arrested. The police turned up soon afterwards.”
Tatchell went on: “Near the end of the meeting, I personally appealed to Diane Abbott to let the Syrians have their say, but she refused and closed the meeting.”
Tatchell’s comments mirrored those of Amr Salahi, an activist from the Syria Solidarity Movement who was also present at the meeting.
“Andrew Murray said absolutely nothing about the people being killed in Syria on a daily basis in Assad’s airstrikes,” Salahi said.
“Murray said that ISIS had to be defeated militarily, and the way to do that was not for the West to get involved but for the Iraqi army and the Syrian army (i.e. Assad’s army) to be helped to defeat ISIS.”
He added: “The [war] was not discussed in reference to the Syrian people in any way. The only focus was on British or American involvement. Not a single Syrian was on the panel. There were Syrians in the audience and at the first opportunity they raised their hands to speak.”
However after raising their disagreements with the StWC panel over the organisation’s views of conflict in Syria, Salahi said the Syrians were prevented from speaking again.
“The first [Syrian activist] to challenge the panel told the speakers they were only looking at ISIS, while Assad was killing dozens of people on a daily basis. [The Syrian] then compared Assad to Hitler, and I told the speakers they were like the Neville Chamberlains of today. [Panellist] Crispin Blunt MP, a supporter of the Iraq war, answered that people in Syria were now looking to Assad to protect them from Islamist extremists. He was unaware that [the Syrian activist in question] had lived in regime controlled Damascus for more than three years since the start of the revolution,” Salahi said.
He added: “After this intervention, no other Syrians were permitted to speak. [The panel] kept opposing the possibility of Western intervention as if that was the only factor. Clara Connolly, an immigration lawyer and activist with Syria Solidarity UK, later told the StWC they were silent about Assad’s crimes but they didn’t care. I told the speakers they just wanted Assad to keep killing people. Clara kept trying to make the point to the speakers that they had nothing to say about what was happening on the ground. All she got in return was silence. Then some of the organisers went up to her and warned her that if she didn’t be quiet, she would be forced to leave.”
Peter Tatchell told LFF a similar story: “When it came to questions from the floor, other members of the audience were asked to speak but not the Syrians. Near the end of the meeting, I personally appealed to Diane Abbott to let the Syrians have their say but she refused and closed the meeting.”
Tatchell added that he was “shocked, surprised and saddened by Diane Abbott’s unwillingness to invite Assad’s victims to express their opinions”. He added that not listening to victims of Assad’s war crimes was “arrogant, insensitive and appalling. It has a whiff of ‘we know best’ and Syrian opinions ‘don’t count’”.
This is not the first time Syrians have been prevented from speaking at a StWC event on Syria. In September, in reply to a letter from Syria Solidarity UK asking StWC to include a Syrian in a separate panel event on Syria, StWC’s Lindsey German replied that it was “not appropriate” to hear from Syrians if they did not clearly oppose military intervention.
“Stop the War, which prides itself on being an anti-imperialist organisation, has an imperialist mind-set par excellence,” Salahi said. “Syrians are not allowed to have an opinion about their own country. Only Westerners are allowed to talk about Syria.”
James Bloodworth is the editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter
90 Responses to “Stop the War refuse to listen to Syrians during debate…on Syria”
Jack
Steven Hunt, live from Syria, where he has conducted some pretty extensive social research apparently.
Next in the news, having a different opinion about foreign policy (where someone always inevitably gets hurt no matter what course of action you take) to Steven makes you a freak. Especially if your opinion is a bit more nuanced than black and white, us vs them tribalism.
Later on today’s programme, Russia bombing a country to expand influence is fine, but if the West does it, it’s imperialism. We’ll hear more on this from our Virtue Signalling correspondent Steven Hunt.
I suppose you type your anti-Imperialism diatribes about McDonald’s on the MacBook your parents bought you?
Steven Hunt
Actually, I have friends that are refugees, and they fully support the legitimate government of Syria.
Of course, when mercenary terrorists funded by the US and its Saudi allies come into Syrian cities to wage war, then there is inevitable confusion and paranoia, mistakes are made. This is a war for Syrian survival.
I also have contacts in Syria, and even if they did not support Assad, they 100 percent support the Syrian and Russian military as these legal forces destroy the US-backed terrorists that want to destroy the Syrian state, and then it would become a vassal proxy for the US and Saudis.
No, your delusion that the majority of citizens inside Syria support the Al Queda linked mercenaries that have caused this terror and destruction is absolutely false.
Go eat your burger and lick the feet of your imperial master.
You are a liar and traitor to the Syrian people.
Steven Hunt
Absolutely correct.
The most important issue is what do the majority of the Syrian people want?
You will notice that the Western propaganda, liar media assiduously avoid any compelling focus on this central question.
The vast majority of the population want the US/NATO/Saudi backed mercenary terrorists defeated, and driven out of the country.
The minirity of Syriams that have formed alliance of violence against the Syrian state are now reaching out to Russia.
Soon they will devote their efforts to drive the US terror rebels out of Syria.
Sorry, traitors, you have been exposed-and you will never be trusted in Syria again.
When you sleep with dogs you get infested with fleas.
Jack
Are these friends of yours the vast majority of the Syrian people?
Go bow down to your Russian imperial overlords (yes, sorry to break it to you, but Russia also had a little bit of an empire going on).
Darren Cahil
The Saudi’s (arguably the most oppressive regime in the Middle East), agree with you. This is the same regime (an ally), has stepped up executions and not long ago sent in the military/tanks to quell the the uprising in Bahrain.