Only Westerners are allowed to talk about Syria
The Stop the War Coalition (StWC) have been accused of preventing victims of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad from speaking at an anti-war event.
During a panel event on Monday evening to discuss the case against British military intervention in Syria, StWC included no Syrians on the speaker’s panel and reportedly refused to allow Syrians to speak from the floor.
The meeting was chaired by Labour MP Diane Abbott and featured chair of the Stop the War coalition Andrew Murray, former leader of the Green Party Caroline Lucas, Labour MP Catherine West, Tory MP Crispin Blunt MP and SNP MP Tommy Shephard.
According to human rights activist Peter Tatchell, who attended the event, no Syrians were included on the panel and the Syrian activists who turned up to the event were threatened with arrest.
Speaking to LFF, Tatchell said:
“Some Syrian victims of Assad’s brutalities turned up but were not allowed to speak. They eventually shouted out in frustration, turning the meeting into momentary chaos, as they were jeered by some of the audience and as StWC stewards tried to eject them – allegedly threatening that they’d be arrested. The police turned up soon afterwards.”
Tatchell went on: “Near the end of the meeting, I personally appealed to Diane Abbott to let the Syrians have their say, but she refused and closed the meeting.”
Tatchell’s comments mirrored those of Amr Salahi, an activist from the Syria Solidarity Movement who was also present at the meeting.
“Andrew Murray said absolutely nothing about the people being killed in Syria on a daily basis in Assad’s airstrikes,” Salahi said.
“Murray said that ISIS had to be defeated militarily, and the way to do that was not for the West to get involved but for the Iraqi army and the Syrian army (i.e. Assad’s army) to be helped to defeat ISIS.”
He added: “The [war] was not discussed in reference to the Syrian people in any way. The only focus was on British or American involvement. Not a single Syrian was on the panel. There were Syrians in the audience and at the first opportunity they raised their hands to speak.”
However after raising their disagreements with the StWC panel over the organisation’s views of conflict in Syria, Salahi said the Syrians were prevented from speaking again.
“The first [Syrian activist] to challenge the panel told the speakers they were only looking at ISIS, while Assad was killing dozens of people on a daily basis. [The Syrian] then compared Assad to Hitler, and I told the speakers they were like the Neville Chamberlains of today. [Panellist] Crispin Blunt MP, a supporter of the Iraq war, answered that people in Syria were now looking to Assad to protect them from Islamist extremists. He was unaware that [the Syrian activist in question] had lived in regime controlled Damascus for more than three years since the start of the revolution,” Salahi said.
He added: “After this intervention, no other Syrians were permitted to speak. [The panel] kept opposing the possibility of Western intervention as if that was the only factor. Clara Connolly, an immigration lawyer and activist with Syria Solidarity UK, later told the StWC they were silent about Assad’s crimes but they didn’t care. I told the speakers they just wanted Assad to keep killing people. Clara kept trying to make the point to the speakers that they had nothing to say about what was happening on the ground. All she got in return was silence. Then some of the organisers went up to her and warned her that if she didn’t be quiet, she would be forced to leave.”
Peter Tatchell told LFF a similar story: “When it came to questions from the floor, other members of the audience were asked to speak but not the Syrians. Near the end of the meeting, I personally appealed to Diane Abbott to let the Syrians have their say but she refused and closed the meeting.”
Tatchell added that he was “shocked, surprised and saddened by Diane Abbott’s unwillingness to invite Assad’s victims to express their opinions”. He added that not listening to victims of Assad’s war crimes was “arrogant, insensitive and appalling. It has a whiff of ‘we know best’ and Syrian opinions ‘don’t count’”.
This is not the first time Syrians have been prevented from speaking at a StWC event on Syria. In September, in reply to a letter from Syria Solidarity UK asking StWC to include a Syrian in a separate panel event on Syria, StWC’s Lindsey German replied that it was “not appropriate” to hear from Syrians if they did not clearly oppose military intervention.
“Stop the War, which prides itself on being an anti-imperialist organisation, has an imperialist mind-set par excellence,” Salahi said. “Syrians are not allowed to have an opinion about their own country. Only Westerners are allowed to talk about Syria.”
James Bloodworth is the editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter
90 Responses to “Stop the War refuse to listen to Syrians during debate…on Syria”
wildcolonialboy
The Kurds aren’t a minority?
Martin Gormley
The war was justified by the war mongerers on the basis that Iraq had WOMD. There were none apart from the ones fabricated in minds and used to brain wash the masses. The genocide of 100’s of thousands of Iraq’s population based on a propaganda fabrication. Your fucking right I am outraged you fucking cretin.
nimh
“Stop The War message to the opposition is clear: Join the Syrian army or get lost.”
That does pretty much sum it up, doesn’t it? Group of British activists tell victims of Assad’s bombs and torture to side with their oppressor or “get lost”.
It’s perhaps no surprise that the only other part of the political landscape where this view holds sway is in parts of the extreme right. There, too, they see Assad as the righteous slayer of muslim extremists, and praise Putin for doing what they consider the West to be too cowardly to do.
Woo11
First – it’s a Coalition, at one time Chaired by the late Tony Benn, hardly a communist or SWP, neither is Jeremy Corbyn, who led it until recently. Second most of us didn’t like Saddam Hussain in the slightest, and had never liked him even while both this country and the US were selling his Gvt WMDs and other military weaponry. Third, Colin Powell said in his statement to the United Nations that Al Queda had links to SH’s Government allegedly proved by the testament of a prisoner captured in Afghanistan on the behest of the US, who was secretly extradited to a country specifically for interegation purposes – where the US knew they used torture, (Egypt). This man retracted his statement apprx 3 years after he made it, to a military tribunal at Guantanamo, saying that it was made under the extreme duress of his torture. Fourth as we know all too well there were no WMDs in Iraq, and the “intelligence” as Blair has recently admitted was wrong – the evidence gained from the statement of a man being tortured (Blair failed to mention that part). And yes we are appalled that he lied to us. You may read Andrew Worthington’s full account of Guantanomo prisoners for further information. Last, many of us feel extremely sick at many of the Heads of State around the world, but it is illegal under international law to go to war for “Regime Change”, for good reason, in the case of Iraq for instance, we now have the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria – ISIS, which sprang out of the war for that so called “Regime Change”.
Woo11
Was the Gvt of this country right to go to war with Iraq?