The Tory press wants us to think like accountants rather than humans
An obvious but overlooked fact about right-wing press coverage of the ongoing ‘migrant crisis’ in Calais, France, is laid bare in this morning’s City AM.
Namely, what makes the Calais crisis a ‘crisis’ is its impact on British business.
The actual financial impact of a few hundred people crossing the border is microscopic. But the commotion caused by poor management of migration and asylum in Calais can disrupt the flow of goods and money – as City AM makes plain today.
The business paper’s front page story, ‘Cameron under fire over crisis in Calais’, has the subheadings: ‘Chaos costing £1.5m a day in Kent’ and ‘Hauliers call for compensation’.
The story stresses the trouble caused to British business.
‘Services through the French port have been disrupted for weeks’, we are told, while traffic on the M20 motorway near the Kent coast is
“costing the country an estimated £1.5million in tourism revenues and consumer spending every day.”
City AM quotes the Institute of Directors (a sort of bosses’ union) saying it’s ‘nearly impossible for Kent business to function’, while the Freight Transport Association claims port delays ‘are costing the UK logistics industry £750,000 each day’.
Meanwhile, the Federation of Small Businesses says 20,000 of its members ‘are being held to ransom’ by the trouble.
The story is a fine example of the money-centric nature of right-wing press coverage, evident in the constant stress on the supposed financial strain adding a few hundred people to the UK workforce would bring.
This emphasis on money takes precedence in stories like the Mail on Sunday’s shady ‘migrants in hotels’ splash yesterday, and today’s Telegraph whinge about the alleged taxi cab bill for transporting asylum seekers’ children to temporary accommodation. (Yes, really.)
Covering the story in this way encourages the reading public to view the problem as accountants, rather than humans.
In fact, the real financial impact – damage to British business – is caused by trying to keep people out, not their being able to sneak in.
What a shame the press would rather paint the story as ‘your money wasted on foreigners’ – a technique with a terrible history.
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
DONATE to support MediaWatch here.
Read more:
Mail on Sunday’s shady ‘Calais migrants in hotels’ story is willfully misleading
Rod Liddle says send migrants back to Syria in the Sun’s shameful Calais coverage
Sign up for our weekly email by clicking here.
21 Responses to “What makes Calais a ‘crisis’ is its impact on British business”
Giles Farthing
it would take hours to cycle to calais on an ethnic peace bicycle powered by hot air and self righteousness
Philip Michael Hunt
‘More than enough’? So you want taxpayers who all work their backsides off the earn the money to pay taxes to give more of itt o outsoders who have no vested interest in this country because you feel sorry for them? Te fact the tax take is vast means that as much as you like can be given to illegal migrants, does it?
Regardless, if you feel so strongly abpout it, why don’t YOU raise the monney or else take a few into YOUR home?
/O43 |_|K19!!
We’re not doing very well at deporting failed asylum seekers so far. And if we did try to take control, you and your ilk will be screaming and shouting about how it’s the next holocaust – so what you’re proposing is really a “time bomb” policy.
We may have been foolish in our foreign policy, but these immigrants are economic migrants. The real asylum seekers found asylum long before they got to Calais.
/O43 |_|K19!!
If we opened the borders, there would be hundreds of millions of so-called “asylum seekers”.
All we are doing by feeding and housing the ones that manage to get through is increasing inequality by rewarding the ones who are already rich and resourceful enough to make the journey, while giving no help to those who could not.
Cole
Gee, hundreds of millions of asylum seekers arriving in Dover. The mind boggles.