There is no shortage of extremists ready to capitalise on the events in Syria to serve their own divisive agendas
In an article entitled, ‘Sectarian Hatred at the Heart of British Muslim community,’ The Times recently highlighted issues of sectarianism that have been bubbling in the UK for some time. These issues have been crystallised after the Syrian conflict which brought matters to a head.
The Times article highlighted a graffiti incident against a Bradford-based Shia institution that had the words ‘Shia Kaffirs’ sprayed across its entrance. TELL MAMA, the national anti-Muslim hate incident reporting project that I manage and founded, picked up this case within hours when a leading member of the British Muslim Shia community reported it into us.
The incident highlighted what many of us knew, that the Syrian conflict, combined with preachers in Muslim communities promoting anti-Shia rhetoric and a mixture of hatred towards Assad and his Shia backers (Hizbollah and Iran), were threatening to upset the fragile cohesion between both faith communities in the UK.
Whatever the driver for the Bradford incident, it was becoming patently obvious to us at TELL MAMA that there were some individuals in Yorkshire and the Midlands who were actively promoting anti-Shia rhetoric. In some instances these individuals have been quietly re-enforcing anti-Shia discussions fuelled by hatred towards Assad and the largely Shia-based military support network that is keeping his administration alive.
The first time I came across the Shia and Sunni fault-lines was in May 2013 whilst I was sitting in Edgware Road in central London. Prior to 2013, I had not seen much of a fissure between the communities, and there seemed to be an acceptance that they found common ground on issues such as Halal food preparation, countering anti-Muslim hatred, protecting places of worship etc.
However 2013 seemed to be a turning point for Sunni-Shia relations in the UK, as the Syrian war dragged on and Assad’s brutal repression of the mainly Sunni population started to appear on YouTube videos. Such readily available content no doubt fuelled public discussions in areas like Edgware Road.
I remember endless conversations taking place in the busy restaurants on this famous road which pitted family against family and business against business in endless arguments about the future of Syria, and about the future of Shia communities in Syria, Iraq and the Gulf.
Most conversations ended in a bout of shisha smoking, raised eyebrows and pats on the back, though it was clear that, however tentatively, positions were being taken and support bases tested. The conflict was beginning to have an impact here in the UK.
Sadly, there were people waiting to take advantage of these emerging religious and political divides. Keen to use any situation as an opportunity to promote extremism, Anjem Choudary and his motley crew descended on Edgware Road in July 2013.
Loudspeaker in hand, surrounded by young hotheads chanting anti-Assad and anti-Shia slogans, a few individuals decided that a group of men walking down Edgware Road were Shia. The resulting brutal assault on one of these men lead to over 10 separate cuts and bruises as he was mauled to the ground and hit with placards which Choudary’s group has previously used to demonstrate against the Egyptian Embassy in Mayfair.
A few days later, I met with the victim and he started to tell me his story. He was a Shia and he was married to a Sunni woman. His children would be influenced by both Islamic traditions and he lived his life on the basis that sectarianism was a cancer that had continued to damage Islam and Muslim communities.
He made clear to me that the attack on him was not something that he held against the Sunni community, and he saw the attack for what it was. He believed that extremist groups were using the war in Syria as a means of opening up Shia and Sunni fractures and this was one way in which Choudary and his group were trying to attract new followers.
The war in Syria has therefore acted as a catalyst for those seeking to create and build divisions within Muslim communities. These divisions have also been manipulated and used by extremist groups who believe that Shia communities are heretics who should be eradicated through force of arms.
Yet we must also acknowledge that there has always been a small section within Sunni communities who have always taken a theological position that Shia communities are non-believers. A handful of them have been active promoting this rhetoric in the UK since before the Syrian war.
Finally, some of the people that I meet in Muslim communities believe that there is no problem and that ‘outside forces’ are at work trying to divide Muslim communities in the UK. The only forces that I see are extremists from within who seek to divide and who relish violence and confrontation.
Sadly, as long as the war in Syria continues, the risk to the UK will remain. The least that we can do is to counter and confront those who seek to sow the seeds of hatred within, to create the conflicts of tomorrow.
Fiyaz Mughal is the director of Faith Matters and the founder of Tell Mama, a project which records and measures anti-Muslim incidents
46 Responses to “Shia hatred is a real and dangerous issue in the UK”
pyewacket
Indeed, human behaviour is all mind stuff, mostly conditioned by culture and religion. In our current era, the Islamic mindset is the most problematic of all, with its often violent intolerance of difference – for example, violent hatred between the Sunni and Shia sects (the subject of Fiyaz Mughal’s article). Also, Islam’s inherent misogyny, homophobia and dismissive attitude towards Western democracy, to name but a few of its many ills.
Incidentally, I used to be very tolerant of all religion, but Islam takes the biscuit. That said, any form of religious belief is fine if kept safely locked up inside the believer’s head and not imposed upon others of a different persuasion. I refer to certain Islamic fanatics who will even commit murder in the name of Allah and for the so-called sin of blasphemy. Due to mass indoctrination of ancient Islamic dogma and associated violence, every airport throughout the world is on red alert. No other religion in our current era is causing such upset. This is why I’m sick and tired of Islam.
Of course, the magic pill for those who can’t live without religion would have to be a voluntary belief in something like Jainism, a true religion of peace (at least, as far as I’m aware). If Islam could become more like Jainism, or even like Quakerism, the rest of us would feel less inclined to blaspheme in defiance of enforced religious codes!
MahmudH
It’s perfectly natural to wish that other people were more peaceful, but it neglects the fact that we don’t live in a peaceful world.
Britain is not, and never has been, a peaceful country. We’ve been in a near continuous state of warfare, internally and/or externally since the beginning of recorded history. What sense does it make, when living in such a violent country, to wish that foreigners in a country you recently invaded, had a less violent faith?
Islam in general is a religion that inspires greater devotion in the average believer than most other mainstream religions today. The prophet Muhammad gave wide ranging teachings, which include matters relating to politics and warfare, and which bare little resemblance to the beliefs and behaviour of modern jihadis who borrow far more from Ghenghis Khan than from the Koran.
Of course you have the right to grumble, but doing so out of ignorance of the detail of what different groups of muslims actually believe will not help you come to terms with the nature of the world as it actually is.
pyewacket
I’m talking specifically about religion here. I know the world is not peaceful and never has been. However, in our current era , Islam kills in the name of its god. Jesus Christ preached peace, not warfare. That’s the difference. Christianity is often mocked and derided, but Christians are no longer into martyrdom. They don’t become suicide bombers or murderers when someone ‘blasphemes’ against their religion. The Koran is very violent, as is the Bible’s Old Testament. However, most modern Christians no longer take the Bible literally word-for-word, tending instead to abide by the peaceful New Testament.
By the way, I’m not ignorant of the Koran’s contents. On the contrary, I’ve been reading it for the past couple of years, on and off, in an attempt to understand the tenets of Islam. I know that it also needs to be read in context with the Hadith.
MahmudH
You should also know then that each sect has its own hadiths, and no set of hadiths can claim to be reliable by the standards of historical methodology.
There’s no reason to believe that the historical Jesus was a pacifist. He did after all apparently say “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” Matt 10v34
I don’t agree with literal interpretations of the Quran, but I do believe that it is right that the Quran puts forward teachings about the right and wrong uses of violence. And the example of the completeness of the Prophet Muhammad’s life is in a sense the true miracle of Islam – no other historical figure has achieved success in every field of life in the way he did – starting as a shepherd, becoming a trader, a husband, a father, a preacher, a warrior, a king, and a messenger of God. Thus criticising islamic theology for having teachings about violence is missing the point – individual teachings may be right or wrong, they should all be questioned and debated – but it is those religions that fail to offer teachings about violence which are unrealistic or incomplete.
MahmudH
It’s true that the Syria war has brought out a lot of latent anti-Shia prejudice. However we shouldn’t neglect the role that money from the Arabian peninsula has played in funding the growth of hard-line Salafist preachers in the UK, who are, not by accident, the most sectarian and anti Shia in their outlook.