Corbyn's campaign is about ideologically beating the rest of the left, not winning over the electorate
Photo credit: Lewisham Dreamer
At the Hay Festival event ‘What Do We Do Now?‘ with Nick Cohen, the left discussed the 2015 election result. Audience opinion during Q&A: the electorate had got it wrong. What they needed was left max to show them the error of their ways. Ed Miliband was left lite, not the real thing let alone the real deal as a prime minister in waiting.
Cohen’s recent must read article ‘Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party: one of them must go‘ talks about how the parliamentary system (which does not support Corbyn) is at odds with what party members want with a Corbyn presidential style support. I share the pessimism of the piece. It signifies a desire for sublime protest without compromise, rather than politics which appeal enough to win a General Election.
Electoral wisdom once was you had to meet the electorate with their concerns and wants. The left are rejecting this need to appeal for the centre ground.
Corbyn is meant to be the candidate worth voting for. He will give you the real thing – a left party in government. How he does that, without winning over enough of the electorate that voted Conservative, does not matter.
This is about rekindling enthusiasm for Labour members, having bought into the emperors new clothes that Labour had on for the 2015 campaign. The result showed to the party just how naked they looked to the rest of us.
The SNP, Greens and Plaid Cymru will never be allowed to upstage Labour again with the mantle of the left, seems to be the rallying cry of Corbyn supporters. Ignore the fact that the Greens lost about a quarter of a million pounds in lost deposits at the general election. Or that Labour membership has been quite solid in recent years.
Discount what Nick Cohen told the audience at Hay, that 58 per cent of the electorate voted for parties with the deepest cuts to the deficit planned. Labour members instead want to have the discussion among themselves to learn the lessons, and ignore those that had warned Ed Miliband was a disaster from the start.
They have concluded they just need a seasoned man of the left to inspire the electorate to vote for them. To hell, once again, with what the media is saying.
As Labour MPs plan coups, the media reports how Corbyn is no prime minister in waiting, that his associations with bigots are too numerous to be down to ignorance of their views. This misses what Labour members are saying by voting for Corbyn.
This is about The Labour Party becoming a protest movement to beat them all. The need for credibility on the economy, statesmanship in international affairs, understanding how the world actually works – the needs of government – no longer apply.
The Conservative Party have understood the electorate better. They get how legislation allows them to transform the nation on ideological lines. They get the need for compromise, negotiation and fancy presentation to win polling day by galvanising the centre ground to vote for them.
That is why they won in 2015 – by being a political party seeking power by getting a mandate from enough of the people.
Labour’s transformation from political party to pressure group may appeal to relatively new members and the old guard hard left activists. People who enjoy being on the streets campaigning for change, rather than in the corridors of power making it happen.
John Sargeant writes on Homo economicus’ Weblog and blogs for the Huffington Post.
Want to read more posts like this? Then *sign-up to Look Left* and make sure you have the facts to rebut right-wing spin
54 Responses to “Corbyn will transform Labour from political party to pressure group”
Comrade Darling
Labour put up three uninspiring candidates and then a fourth is put up (to beat the left/have a broad debate?) and voting for Corbyn is supposed to signify that members and supporters want to become a protest movement, reductio ad absurdum. As if the presented choice were the choice of the voters in thr first place.
The ‘Corbyn phenomonon’ has many explanations and is clearly a complex expression, to reduce this in the way the author above has is absurd.
Then he pulls out his crystal ball and tells us of unelectability when it is plainly events that decide elections. Who knows what the electorate will think in five years after constant austerity; another recession; further scandals; a clear mood growing further as in Greece and Spain; to name but a few possible events.
All we see here is the stark fear of all ‘centrist’s’ that the game is up and they are potentially about to lose control of the Party that so much effort and treasure has been spent to control. They will spare no effort in generating fear in order to persuade genuine LP supporters to be careful and not vote for the ‘extremist’ rather than trying to understand what is making so many people rally behind Corbyn, in and out of the party.
The problem with these people is that they don’t understand the people in Trade Unions and on the estates who have had enough of Tory and Tory lite, they never will.
DaveCitizen
I think you need to get out and be at large a bit more. For what it’s worth, Corbyn’s approach and statements have given me some hope – hope that this country might once again do something special in the world instead of cowing down to the things it has been taught to fear (bankers having no incentive to work if not paid millions, companies refusing to make money here if they have to pay a fair share of tax, trains grinding to a halt if they’re run like those in Germany (interestingly the German state rail company run some of ours!) etc. etc. .
madasafish
Too true.
I’ve seen it before. George McGovern in the US and Tony Benn in the UK..
The best quote on McGovern’s candidancy iirc was: “you cannot build a movement based on the young, the poor and blacks” He lost all but 2 states.
Tony Benn failed to achieve anything in his political career but wrote diaries. And Labour propose a Leader who apparently does not write a diary and cannot hold a candle to Tony Benn.
Goodby to the working class who worry about immigration, pensioners. and the employed in private industry. but hello to public service unions, the poor and benefit claimants..
Corbyn is unlikely to get security clearance..based on his track record.
Worth 2 million votes to the Conservatives
Keith M
This would be laughable if you were not so sadly delusional. You really have swallowed the crap the neocons have fed you.
Keith M
Security clearance – who governs?