The paranoia within sections of Britain's Muslim communities is toxic to integration
I understand that there is a genuine fear within Muslim communities around the counter-terrorism agenda. I also understand that the fear is based on mistakes that have taken place within the counter-terrorism agenda and that we need a genuine debate about this.
However there are sections of Britain’s Muslim communities that believe the world revolves around bizarre conspiracies. For them, seeing the wood from the chaff is increasingly difficult.
For example, a legitimate attempt by Faith Matters to engage with young people across the country – to see what impacts far-right and Al Qaeda or ISIS influenced rhetoric has on them online – has been portrayed by such groups as a ‘spying exercise’.
In reality it is an initiative to develop a report which can give young people at a grass roots level the opportunity to have their voices heard at a policy level.
It does not matter that the initiative will be resourced and organised independently by Faith Matters with no funding from the government; according to these conspiracy purveyors it is, as mentioned, a ‘spying exercise’.
This seems to be the over-riding narrative for them: that Muslim communities are hard done by and that progressive organisations that want to work with government – as critical friends – are the problem.
Such paranoia feeds a dangerous victim narrative. It also affects a sense of identity, integration and dare I say it, injects a desire in some Muslims to leave the UK.
About four months ago I was quoted in this article, leading to a flurry of bullying, abusive and slanderous comments from sections of Muslim communities which had previously praised the decade of work we at Faith Matters have done on cohesion, integration and supporting faith communities.
Some of these critics had used and quoted material from TELL MAMA, a national project I founded to support victims of anti-Muslim hate. This project which was supported for two years by central government (between 2012- 2013) provided material, data and information that many of these individuals, groups and activists used to shore up the fact that anti-Muslim hate and bigotry exists.
However after the Telegraph article their conspiratorial mind-set kicked in. This led to a campaign of smears, intimidation and hate directed at TELL MAMA – and directed at me in person.
These are the sorts of individuals who today attempt to hold sway and play to a victim narrative within Muslim communities. I regard such people as being part of the problem we have to deal with. These are the ‘Del Boys’ who trot out half-truths and peddle condiments that sicken and weaken Muslim communities through disengagement and introversion.
Instead of supporting the only project nationally that has produced tangible evidence of anti-Muslim hatred, these ‘Del-Boys’ of the Muslim world are only interested in the one occasion when we were invited to speak on a TELL MAMA report at the Quilliam Foundation – which we did, given that we will speak at any platform, (apart from extremist groups and those who have used prejudiced terms against whole communities).
This example sums up what they do. They are the Pied Pipers whistling a tune leading to further misunderstanding, greater barriers and a political cliff where disengagement becomes the norm.
This is certainly not the Britain I want, nor a future I want to see for Muslim communities and co-religionists. My view is one of confident Muslim communities and citizens, equals who do not feel victimised but who are willing to be critical when required and constructive for the greater good.
The Quilliam Foundation is the bogey man used by these groups to smear anyone who does not dance to their tune (if only the Quilliam Foundation were that connected and powerful). Some of those pushing this line are characters who developed ‘media personalities’ through Twitter and who, thankfully, have been outed as the manipulative ego-centric people they are. Today they hide in the shadows posting items anonymously on Islamist blogs.
The time has come to take a stand against such groups. This does not mean there have been no problems in how counter-terrorism work has been developed and implemented at community level. There have; but what is the alternative proposed by the government’s critics? They simply have none.
Lastly, this does not mean practitioners like me have not made mistakes in our partnership choices on occasion. We are human and, sadly, mistakes do take place and we have to be honest and open about these when they take place since we have placed ourselves into the public sphere.
But the future is not all doom and gloom. It is – and should be – one where Muslim communities stand tall and engage with government.
Fiyaz Mughal is the director of Faith Matters and the founder of Tell Mama, a project which records and measures anti-Muslim incidents
37 Responses to “Muslim communities must stand tall and engage with the government”
Ringstone
I don’t seem to recall Orthodox Jews blowing people up or preaching the overthrow of the Common Law, which you seem so fond of.
There are issues, some cultural and some religious but all well rehearsed, within parts of the South Asian/Middle Eastern community which are not acceptable in a Western pluralist society; either the wider community addresses them or pressure will build for someone to sort it out for them. The ball is firmly in their court.
lancastrian1
So you think the ECHR got it wrong on Sharia Law? The fact is that Islam/Sharia is designed to control just about all aspects of society and as such is very dangerous as these examples from established Islamic states show. The growth of this particular political ideology is not to be encouraged in the UK:
Sudan: 2nd woman sentenced to death by stoning
http://allafrica.com/stories/201207250337.html
Sudan: Amputations carried out by Govt
http://www.emirates247.com/news/region/sudan-man-s-foot-hand-amputated-by-court-order-2013-02-28-1.496915
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2013/03/12/Official-Sudan-will-continue-amputations/UPI-83841363096550/
Pregnant woman sentenced to hang for apostasy
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/sudan/10833226/Pregnant-woman-faces-death-in-Sudan-for-apostasy.html
Iran hanging a schoolgirl for ‘immoral behaviour’
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/5217424.stm
Iran regime amputates hands of two prisoners
http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/human-rights/18613-iran-regime-amputates-hands-of-two-prisoners
Iran: Unveil machine to amputate fingers of thieves
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/9831727/Iran-unveils-finger-amputating-machine-for-use-on-thieves.html
Nigeria: Sharia Court Sentences Nine to Death for Blasphemy
http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/sharia-court-sentences-nine-to-death-for-blasphemy/213149/
Malaysia Shariah Law: Islamist Party Passes Bill To Implement Harsh Islamic Criminal Punishments
http://www.ibtimes.com/malaysia-shariah-law-islamist-party-passes-bill-implement-harsh-islamic-criminal-1852948
Brunei adopts sharia – international outcry
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/01/world/asia/brunei-sharia-law/
lancastrian1
Your reply doesn’t address the issue that teaching sharia law is radicalisation. That is at the very least the start of the path to jihad and since just about all jihadist groups are fighting to impose sharia law ( as the basis for Islamic rule) it makes sense that we oppose sharia law. In fact I believe it ought to be banned in the UK.
lancastrian1
It is also noticeable how many responders on this subject invoke Judaism. That isn’t a political ideology that presents a direct and potent threat to our way of life and values, sharia law is just such a threat.
Patrick Nelson
Shariah is a very broad term, very little of what it means has anything to do with politics but is rather related to personal piety.
The Shariah that is taught in the Madrassas in England covers such matters as how to pray, fast, pay zakaat, what foods are lawful or not according to Islamic Divine Law etc.
Nearly all the education in Madrassas is the memorization of the Quran in Arabic and in most cases this is without understanding of the meanings as very few British Muslim youths can actually comprehend classical Arabic, so in your terms it is equivalent to memorizing a very long song that you do not know the specific meanings of.
Badder Mienhof and dozens of Socialist terrorist groups used to murder people with the belief that they were helping to establish socialism, do you support the banning of socialism?
People commit acts of terrorism in the name of Democracy will you ban democracy because of it?