The government is intent on extending benefit sanctions by stealth
Recipients of welfare compensation are having their benefits stopped or reduced because of sanctions being doled out by Iain Duncan Smith’s Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).
The extent to which a sanctions culture has been engrained in our social security system has yet to fully emerge.
That’s why I have been working with Baroness Jenny Jones to table a series of Parliamentary questions to expose the mainstreaming of sanctions, including the extension of sanctions to people in work.
The DWP claims that sanctions are only used as a last resort and in a small minority of cases. They have even put a number on it, claiming that 94 per cent of Jobseeker’s aren’t sanctioned.
But Iain Duncan Smith’s department has form when it comes to fiddling the figures. At the end of 2014, 900,000 people claimed Jobseeker’s Allowance but over 600,000 Jobseeker sanctions were issued. It is plainly obvious that Iain Duncan Smith’s department is being far from transparent.
The government is stubbornly refusing to publish an annual sanction rate. The data, they claim, would be prohibitively expensive.
This is nonsense, and the government must come clean. By taking the number of jobseekers at the beginning of a year, adding new claimants, and taking away those who find work, the true sanction rate is likely to be around 17-18 per cent. That’s around one in six jobseekers.
It is little wonder the government doesn’t want to do the maths – particularly given the growing awareness of the damage that sanctions do.
Sanctions kick people when they are down. They drive up the need for foodbanks. They target the most disadvantaged, hurting tens of thousands of children. They are unfair, punitive and in some cases lethal.
By the DWP’s own admission sanctions damage the claimant. But their rulebook merely states that someone with a health condition should not deteriorate under sanctions more than that of a healthy adult.
We know from international studies that benefit sanctions don’t help people find work. Iain Duncan Smith knew this before he began this push. But he also knew that he could proceed with next to no opposition as it was New Labour that first introduced them.
The government is intent on extending sanctions by stealth. Meanwhile, it continues to perpetuate the myth that they only apply to a few ‘undeserving’ cases.
This deception is part of the Tory attempts to rebrand poverty, rather than tackle it. The government continues to prevent the release of figures for the suicides of benefit claimants, and those who die shortly after being certified ‘fit for work’.
The Tory manifesto proposed sanctioning those who don’t accept prescribed medical treatments and therapies. This is now moving forward for drug users and the obese and mental health claimants are next in line.
Iain Duncan Smith has led the charge to criminalise poverty. But even convicted criminals serving time in prison are guaranteed food to eat.
He wrongly believes that people need to be bullied and harassed into work, all the while sitting as part of a government that has fostered an explosion of insecure, low paid jobs.
He’s even going so far as to mainstream the sanctions culture by extending it to people receiving in work tax credits. Last year, Iain Duncan Smith told the Work and Pensions Select Committee that trials were being carried out in the North-West on removing benefits from part-time workers who refuse to take on extra hours.
The mainstreaming of benefit sanctions and their extension to the working-poor is a grotesque interpretation of how social security should work. It treats those who need help as presumed guilty, not innocent. It is another example of the Tories ‘Hunger Games’ politics, seeking to divide the nation at every turn.
Jonathan Bartley is the Green Party’s work and pensions spokesperson. Follow him on Twitter
57 Responses to “IDS’s gradual criminalisation of poverty”
Steve Mc
Don’t feed the troll! Don’t feed the troll! Don’t feed the troll!
Rob
The Government MUST GO!
ian brunsdon
please contact me at ianbrunsdon469@btinternet .com I think I could help.
Matt James
Very distressing. I hope your new job will see your fortunes change. The culture of treating employees like expendable cattle must stop.
Morgeo
I have great sympathy for those suffering from unrealistic and unfair policies from the DWP.
As a pensioner who is deprived any annual uprating to my pension based purely on where I live in retirement along with half a million others, we have been robbed for decades by a government regulation which Steve Webb decided to put into the Pensions Act in clause 20..
Some pensioners now on less than £30 per week
One wonders when the Pensions Regulator will ask the DWP when it is
going to honour the contributions made by the minority frozen few
pensioners and grant them their proper pension entitlement.
Or is this just another useless department biassed against the pensioners ?
Yes, you read that right as it is an entitlement by virtue of the
contributions made by the employee & employer and not a benefit to
be withdrawn on a whim like happened to some writing here.
Let’s get it right : THE PENSION BELONGS TO THE PENSIONER AND NOT TO THE GOVERNMENT.
Sharp practices should NOT be allowed by a government department if not allowed by a private pension provider.
And it is only a 4% minority who are denied their rightful uprating and that is a discriminatory policy which is contrary to the code of conduct of members of parliament.
Mr Duncan Smith, get your house in order now .
If it were happening to an MP’s pension you would have been on to it yesterday.
My intention here is not to take away from those being denied their rightful benefits but to highlight the fact that you are not alone in commenting and fighting for justice from the DWP.
The sooner they are brought to book the better for us all.