A glance at the wealth of some of the signatories makes it hard to believe they care about ordinary people
How much weight the public attach to the letter by big business leaders supporting Conservative economic policy depends on whether people think the business leaders in question are motivated by altruism or self-interest.
A quick glance at the incredible wealth of some of the signatories, and the pay policies of their companies, makes it very difficult to believe they are concerned about the lives of ordinary people.
Pay details of selected FTSE 100 CEOs who signed the letter, and are compelled to disclose their pay in their companies’ annual reports, are as follows:
- Prudential CEO Tidjane Thiam was paid £11.8 million in 2014, up from a mere £8.7 million in 2013. In 2010, he struggled by on just £5.3 million, so people might not find it surprising that he thinks things have got better under the Coalition
- Andy Harrison, the CEO of Whitbread, which owns the Costa Coffee chain amongst other restaurant brands, was paid £6.3 million, over 400 times as much as his average employee. Again, CEO pay at Whitbread has increased from just £2.6 million in 2010
- George Weston, the chief executive of Primark owners Associated British Foods got a £5 million incentive payment last year, on top of a salary of around £1 million plus various other bonuses. His total pay added up to over £7 million, roughly 500 times as much as his average employee. Primark has been criticised for its refusal to pay ordinary workers the living wage
- Despite falling oil prices, BP could still afford to pay Bob Dudley around £9.4 million last year, up from about £8.8 million in 2013, though Aidan Heavey of Tullow Oil wasn’t so lucky – his company’s plummeting share price reduced his pay to just £2.4 million, compared to £2.8 million the previous year.
- In his final full year at Diageo, Paul Walsh was paid £15.6 million. Mr Walsh has previously argued that higher taxes on the rich make it harder for the UK to attract and retain top talent. Cynics might wonder if there was anyone in particular he had in mind.
These pay packages do not necessarily invalidate the opinions of the CEOs (though we should be wary of crediting them with the wisdom of Solomon) or have any bearing on whether they are right or wrong about Labour and Tory economic policies.
But such vulgar sums of money do make it easier for critics to argue that the letter’s authors are a bunch of self-serving racketeers concerned only with preserving an economic system that facilitates their own enrichment, rather than public-spirited entrepreneurs who genuinely want what’s best for the country.
Many sensible businesspeople have argued that the culture of executive greed – and the public contempt that it engenders – threatens the long-term sustainability of a capitalist system. The damage that such colossal pay packages do to the credibility of the authors of this letter is a very good case in point.
Luke Hildyard is a contributing editor at Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter
Left Foot Forward doesn't have the backing of big business or billionaires. We rely on the kind and generous support of ordinary people like you.
You can support hard-hitting journalism that holds the right to account, provides a forum for debate among progressives, and covers the stories the rest of the media ignore. Donate today.
54 Responses to “REVEALED: The fat cat pay packets of the Tory-supporting bosses”
Leon Wolfeson
And there you have a wild attack.
Politics is not a protected category, of course.
Your political views have no special protection from being insults, as much as you’d like it.
Guest
Yea, those evil life choices like not be born to the right family.
Guest
“Wealth creators”
No, leeches who routinely destroy British jobs, pay starvation wages, slurp up
corporate welfare and lobby to change the law so they can pay even less – benefiting from things like unpaid “workfare” slave labour.
The “recovery” is purely in the city, for the leeches like you. You ignore deflation, ignore the bubble, ignore the nearly flat hours worked, ignore poverty…well no, actually you’ve rejoiced in raising poverty.
You’d rather listen only to your Class. As you deny Britain has fiat currency, while attacking those evil nurses and teachers. Oh, and non-scam pensions.
Guest
It could be raised and still be one of the lowest. But facts.
Labour’s moved right, it’s just that the Tories are offering even more for them and less for the peons. You’re fine with the poor having to beg, as you say that America for instance is a “begging bowl”, since they did exactly what Labour were doing before the coalition put an emergency halt to the recover and had us a depression.
But facts,
Leon Wolfeson
You want to damp down the cycles, not amplify them wildly. Moreover, you want to ensure that the low paid are not the ones who keep losing out, even on the upswing!