Addressing dysfunctional levels of corporate pay is necessary to create the kind of stable society that business needs in order to flourish
The astonishing sums of money raked in by bankers, big business leaders, fund managers et al are doing more damage to the reputation of business than any other issue, according to a survey of Institute of Directors members published today by the High Pay Centre.
52 per cent of respondents identified ‘anger over senior levels of executive pay’ as the biggest threat to public trust in business, just ahead of product mis-selling and negative portrayal of business in the media.
48 per cent said that declining trust in business was an important threat to the success of their own company, against just 26 per cent who said it was not.
This rather skewers the argument that it is somehow ‘anti-business’ or ‘the politics of envy’ to want to address dysfunctional and disproportionate levels of executive pay. Sensible commentators, including plenty on the political right, have argued that reducing top pay to the point that, say, a FTSE 100 Chief Executive has to work for a week – or even a whole month – to earn the average UK worker’s annual salary, rather than just two days as is currently the case, is a necessary pre-condition for the kind of stable society not riven by bitterness and division that business needs in order to flourish.
Our survey findings suggest that beyond the boardrooms of Britain’s biggest mega corporations, most businesspeople themselves agree with this assessment.
The Labour Party’s economic policy paper ‘A better plan for Britain’s Prosperity’ released last month contains some sensible measures for making big business more accountable over top pay: putting elected workforce representatives onto the company ‘remuneration committees’ that set top pay, and forcing investment funds who control shareholdings on behalf of ordinary savers to disclose how they vote when pay policy is put to a shareholder vote.
Recent research from the TUC found that the average pay for a ‘RemCom’ member is around £450,000, roughly 16 times the UK average. It is hardly surprising that these people have become quite cavalier about pay increases amounting to tens or even hundreds of thousands of pounds for directors who already earn millions. A reality check from ordinary workers who won’t accumulate that amount of money over their entire lifetime might encourage a more frugal use of company funds.
Similarly, the TUC found that over a third of RemCom members are themselves executives of other companies whose own pay is dictated by wider executive pay trends and are thus incentivised to wave through huge pay increases for other business leaders, while the fund managers who vote on executive pay policy on behalf of shareholders once it has been finalised by the RemComs also benefit from a culture of high pay.
Executive pay is essentially a market where the seller sets the going rate using someone else’s money. This is a view as likely to be expressed in Moneyweek as in the Morning Star and corresponds with that of Institute of Directors members. Therefore, the howling of vested interests and misguided free-market fundamentalists that it is ‘anti-business’ can be safely ignored.
Luke Hildyard is a contributing editor to Left Foot Forward
15 Responses to “Executive pay is damaging the reputation of business”
David Davies
There is no public trust in the tax dodging thieves who continue to make hay, whilst the sun shines on them. They do it, because they can; and there is no political will to get them to pay their whack, either.
Faerieson
As you write, it is entirely ‘because they can,’ and bears no comparison to ‘what they’re worth.’ The climate now appeas to be outlandish remuneration for the failed CEO, whilst the regular-overtime-for-no-recompense worker continues to shoulder the weight of anything ‘austerity.’
Ian
Quite right that business’ reputation is being damaged, if only it was damaged in the bank balance, too. We have let these people believe they’re some sort of gods with all the nonsense about ‘wealth creators’ and ‘job creators’ and humouring them whenever they have a hissy fit about maybe paying a bit more tax or maybe paying their employees properly.
Leon Wolfeson
Another reason I feel a basic income is a good idea. It cripples business’s leverage over workers. And makes it a lot easier to collect many forms of tax.
Ian
It more than likely almost pay for itself in administration cost savings, too. Nt going to happen with any of the three main parties in government, though. They all seem to be under the impression they’re in favour of a free market, though by ‘free’, I mean ‘heavily rigged in favour of business’…