Ed Miliband's tuition fees policy is equitable, good for Britain and good for the taxpayer
Ed Miliband today stood at the Leeds College of Music to deliver a speech which, it is safe to say, has been hotly anticipated – especially by young people and those who could be first time voters.
A lot has been trailed about what could be coming today, but it would appear that despite the right-wing media’s attempts to smear Ed, a promise has been given which can be delivered. More importantly, this would deliver a genuine saving for tax payers across the country from the get go.
So what is this promise?
A £3k cut in tuition fees, you might think, would cost you the tax payer more. However, nothing could be further from the truth. Fees were introduced in January 2004, so just over 11 years ago, with the idea that as a graduate’s earnings went up they would be more and more able to pay off the money that they had in effect borrowed from the government.
As the below graph shows there is a direct correlation between graduate lifetime earnings, the level at which tuition fees are set and the amount which is then paid back to the government through a person’s pay. Indeed, the higher fees go, the more unlikely it is a graduate will pay back the loan in full.
I, for one, am not surprised at this and I graduated in 2012. Since then my pay may have varied a great deal but one thing I am certain of is that, at least in my current job where I pay on average £1 (yes £1!) per month towards my fees, I will never pay back the loan in full under the current system.
As @EvidenceUK so rightly points out, the potential for paying back in full is dependent almost entirely on the level at which fees are set and the potential earnings of a graduate in their lifetime. This may seem self evident but the fact remains, with wages being squashed it is unlikely that anyone graduating within the last three years and the next two (give or take) – should the current system remain – will repay their fees in full.
So what does this mean on the ground? This will entrench the need for educational institutions to spend more and more time on seeking funding from elsewhere, in effect what we’re seeing with the £9k tuition fee levels is enforced “Business-ification” of what were once considered quality educational establishments.
What Ed Miliband is offering is a rebuttal of this, it is education for all which is quality at the point of use and which most importantly will allow the government to have the money returned to them. Yes, of course, there will be many out there who want the Labour Party to go further even so far as to abolish tuition fees completely.
This is a laudable aim, but what Ed is offering is a starting point from which to begin real change both in higher education and elsewhere. A comparable example is that of the railways; many of us want them returned entirely to the public sector but until such a point as the Labour Party are in majority government this cannot be achieved as legislation is required.
Ed has offered a promise which is deliverable under a Labour government, a promise which can be relied upon and more to the point is equitable. Reducing fees from £9k to £6k would mean an average reduction in debt of around £9k per student; alongside this it will cut the burden on taxpayers in the order of £40bn by 2030.
This is not an idle promise, similar to that signed by Nick Clegg ahead of May 2010, these are fully funded allowing the full protection of our universities so they can concentrate on what they do best – offering the best possible education for the next generation. As an aspiring graduate student myself and also someone paying back laughably small amounts of my tuition fees, I for one can sign up to this straight away.
Ed’s HE policy is equitable, good for Britain as a whole, good for the taxpayer and most importantly will mean Britain retains it’s hard fought for reputation for excellence in Higher Education. This policy is reason enough for first time voters and young people to vote Labour.
Owain Gardner is a graduate of York University and co-editor of Labour Left’s Red Book
114 Responses to “Ed Miliband’s tuition fee pledge: another reason for young people to vote Labour”
Kevin Stall
What does scrapping fees accomplish? How many more degrees will there be? How many more jobs? If you increase the numbers of degrees then you are making them less relevant. In the US, you need at least a master’s to work in social sciences, a bachelor degree is worthless. The same with many other fields. You are worried about the wrong thing. Does your time have value to you? If you work your butt off for three years should your degree have value? If there is no cost to getting a degree then what value will it have? If everyone has a high distinction then what value does it have? If everyone has a degree what value will it have? Will it get you a job? There are plenty of people out there with graduate degrees that work for minimum wage. Will a BS end up the equivalent of having one gcse?
treborc1
no labour have said they will take money from the pension pot to pay for it…But only the rich pension pot…
Leon Wolfeson
Reference, please.
Guest
Peons must keep paying more than they will gain from a degree in your world, right, at greater cost to the government.
There is NO financial benefit to doing a degree unless you’re going into the City. As you demand we down-skill, as usual for the hard right.
Adam
What does scrapping fees accomplish? 1) Education is a right and a public good, therefore why should you have to pay? Being educated benefits the individual and society at large.
2) More people would go to university if fees were scrapped. Whether charging has or hasn’t affected the numbers, more people would go if fees were scrapped. 3) I’m afraid bringing the US into this argument is pointless as many Americans can’t seem to grasp the idea of paying for something out of general taxation. In America you have lower taxes but have to pay for everything yourself – that’s not how we do things here! 4) If an economic powerhouse like Germany can scrap fees, why can’t the whole of the UK? Clearly Germany have their reasons and that’s a Conservative govt in Germany, not some band of socialists. 5) Nobody should have to leave education and be in debt. Why should you have to be in debt just to be educated. As I have said, education is a right, it’s not something you should have to get into debt for. The same as healthcare! 6) Even after cutting fees to 6K, the UK will still have the most expensive fees by miles. The European average is about £1.4K a year. 7) We had free education up until 1998, so why should this generation have to pay? It’s wrong and all about right-wing ideology!