The Green Party's leader put forward her views on education, pay and the NHS in a live debate with young voters.
The Green Party’s leader put forward her views on education, pay and the NHS in a live debate with young voters
Last night Green Party leader Natalie Bennett was the first politician to appear on Leaders Live, a new debate series that gives young people the chance to put questions directly to leaders.
Broadcast live on YouTube, the series is created by Bite the Ballot, an organisation that empowers young people to make informed voting decisions.
Bennett’s appearance was significant as she has been omitted from the BBC’s scheduled debates that will mark the run up to the general election.
You can watch the full debate here.
The questions that the audience asked Bennett showed that jobs and education are at the top of their list of worries.
When asked who she proposed would cover the cost of the free higher education the Greens have promised, Bennett pointed to rich individuals and multinational companies who do not pay their taxes.
She stressed that there is a need for society to be “rebalanced” and that multinationals need to take responsibility for contributing towards society.
The issue of equality also informs the Greens’ policy on drugs.
Bennett was adamant that drugs “should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal justice issue”, and said that the amount of discretion given to police means that more people from minority backgrounds are arrested for drug misuse than people from other backgrounds.
This, she said, is despite the fact that more privileged people are no less likely to be using drugs.
Bennett also pledged to end zero-hours contracts, and stated that her party was “absolutely opposed” to unpaid internships. Alongside workers who currently receive a minimum wage, interns, she said, should be paid the Living Wage as a minimum.
The NHS was also a key issue in the debate. Bennett warned that the UK is ‘racing towards’ an American style privatised health system, and criticised the private finance initiatives (PFI) which are holding the NHS hostage with huge interest rates and service charges.
Campaign group Drop the NHS Debt estimate that by 2020-21, the annual costs of the 118 NHS PFIs will be £2.14bn. Saving 46 per cent of that would release about £1bn a year.
As part of the Greens’ plans for the NHS, Bennett promised that more detail on mental healthcare would be added to their manifesto. She criticised the way that mental health problems are regarded as less urgent than physical ones, and pledged parity of esteem for people with mental illness.
On education, Bennett said that no school run by a faith group should receive government money. She predicted that in the event of this becoming legislation, many faith schools would choose to come into the secular system rather than become private.
The school system also face criticism from the Green leader over its competitive nature. Bennett said that the system should be based on cooperation, and shold include a more practical curriculum covering things like relationships, health and nutrition, in order to give pupils an “education for life”.
Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter
49 Responses to “Natalie Bennett: We have to ban zero-hours contracts”
hs1815
Yes, we know when they will be working but they are still going to be on a zero hour contract… What I’m saying is zero hour contracts are sometimes useful, they can’t abolish them completely, unless of course, they were going to put something else in for cases similar to this.
Leon Wolfeson
There’s ways round a 0-hour ban if they know when they’ll be working then.
You can, for example, give them a single contract without hours specified, and then a second contract specifying hours at the start of each month.
It’s slightly more paperwork, but as long as you can set hours at the start of the month you’d be good.
Nick London
You should know this guy is pulling your chain. He engages in these debates and immediately gets personal. He often then switches out of discus to leave insulting, bizarre and paranoid posts as a “guest”, although on your timeline they always come up as leon. I and many others have reported him to the moderator to kick him off without success so far. In the meantime the best policy is to ignore his posts.
uglyfatbloke
Thanks for taking the time Nick; not really a surprise I suppose.
Nick London
No worries. Today he accused me of being ukip, wanting to throw his body down a well (I had said “hope you are well”), wanting to send around my right wing thugs to kick his face in (I had said “I hope you get the help you need”). Etc etc. he’s barmy.