We don’t need to go trawling through old manifestos and historic statements; it’s right there on their website.
We don’t need to go trawling through old manifestos and historic statements; it’s right there on their website
The establishment’s UKIP strategy is failing, and failing badly.
Gaffe after gaffe have done nothing to dampen the party’s appeal, and the latest musical travesty won’t either.
You can expect to hear the phrase ‘more Tory than the Tories’ more and more over the next few months, and this has some value for Labour as a UKIP strategy.
It will work up to a point, but UKIP are likely to offer some lefty-sounding policies in their manifesto to defend themselves when campaigning in traditionally Labour seats.
The evidence base for ‘more Tory than the Tories’ is largely UKIP’s 2010 manifesto, historic statements from senior Kippers, as well as ad hominem attacks on members and donors.
This is a legitimate line of attack, but will be superseded when UKIP releases its next manifesto, which will undoubtedly be less obviously ‘Tory’ than the last.
However, hope is not lost. Instead of (or at least alongside) attacking UKIP for things they’ve disowned, Labour can attack UKIP’s current policies – and there is more ammunition here than you might think.
Making a positive case for immigration or EU membership is difficult to put on a leaflet or turn into a sound bite, but attacking these is simple enough:
1) ‘Locally-elected County Health Boards to inspect hospitals – to avoid another Stafford Hospital crisis’
UKIP want to create a whole new layer of politicians? I thought they were ‘anti-politics’? No. In fact, UKIP want to repeat the disaster of elected Police & Crime Commissioners, except rather than just one new politician for each area, they want a whole board. If we guess that these boards would be made up of around five to 10 people in each of over 80 counties/unitary authorities, that’s between 400 and 800 more politicians.
A vote for UKIP is a vote for more top-down reorganisation of the NHS and more taxpayer money spent on politicians’ salaries.
2) ‘Immigrants must financially support themselves and their dependents for 5 years. This means private health insurance (except emergency medical care), private education and private housing – they should pay into the pot before they take out of it’
So UKIP want to starve the NHS of the millions it receives every year from charges to patients from overseas? In 2010-11, Great Ormond Street hospital alone took in in over £20 million in charges to foreign patients. Under UKIP, all of that money would go into private hands.
What else would it mean? Clogged up A&E departments, ambulance services put under even more strain and millions wasted as EU migrants wait until they need emergency care to get treatment. Worse still, for all Farage’s fears about immigrants bringing in HIV, exemptions for communicable diseases would be scrapped. Vote UKIP, get ebola.
3) ‘Prioritise social housing for people whose parents and grandparents were born locally’
Yep, I’m going to use that word. This is a racist policy and a new spin on a longstanding BNP commitment. Discriminating against someone because their grandparents weren’t born locally means discriminating against the vast, vast majority of black people in this country, and the vast majority of people of Asian descent. Grandparents were Jewish refugees? No housing for you.
It would affect many people identifying as ‘White British’ too, causing huge damage to the economy as people in settled jobs in one part of the country have to quit and move to another area to access housing.
Skin colour doesn’t have to be in the wording of the law for it to be racist: if the reality is that virtually all BME citizens are discriminated against in access to housing, there’s no doubt in my mind. I don’t think the vast majority of UKIP supporters are racist. I don’t even think Nigel Farage is a racist, despite those comments about Romanians. But this is a racist policy, and we should let people know.
These aren’t the typical left-wing attacks that UKIP is used to brushing off, or the hubristic dismissals we are used to hearing from the right. These are calm responses to ridiculous policies that voters of all persuasions will want to hear. They shatter the illusion of UKIP as the party of ‘common sense’. They are the party of extra politicians, communicable disease, private healthcare, private education and discrimination.
Charlie Cadywould is currently completing an MSc in Public Policy at UCL focusing on labour markets and regulation
134 Responses to “UKIP policies: dangerous, costly and yes, racist”
James Cockburn
Personally, from a Ukipper I still think you are way off the mark attacking those policies. You miss the point by a long margin.
People want change, and there are only two parties that have MPs that are not something we have already tried and ergo offer “change”.
Green or UKIP.
You need to be asking why public opinion doesn’t flock to the alternative left party and in fact aligns itself with UKIP.
Attacking UKIPs policies will do nothing, because they cant be any worse than what we already have is what is in the minds of many.
Now, if the left could drum up a decent party that could convey their message in any way half as decent as Farage has you guys might have somewhere to go. But after years of leftist rules that have gone to far, and created division in so many places, I’m afraid you are reaping what you sow.
The UKIP genie is well and truly out of the bottle, and there is literally nothing that you can do at this stage but try and stem the tide, because it wont recede.
George Laird
Dear Fubar
The reason for that is that while they want to ‘start a fight’ with other parties, they then don’t have any time to fight for the people.
In politics the ‘act’ of the phoney fight is well known as a tactic to divert.
I voted tactically in the Euro 2014 in Scotland to return a Ukip MEP, the reason was to ensure that Tasmina Ahmed-Shiekh who has been in more parties than some girl bands didn’t get elected.
I also did some articles to support Ukip on my blog read by the main parties because the SNP had to be denied the third seat.
It worked.
Now, Ukip needs to address some policy issues and presentation to tighten up, if they do that they could do well in 2015 but the change needs to start now.
I am not surprised working class people leaving behind the Labour Party, however it seems a complete mystery to them especially in Scotland.
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
John Smith
and that is why UKIP are so popular in the North
Heywood was not an aberration
This is the end of Labour’s fiefdom & hegemony
John Smith
Unfettered immigration is in there. Their Cash in Hand philosophy has hammered employment & wages
John Smith
‘immagrant’
which country is that?