Message to David Cameron: you have no evidence the benefit system acts as a ‘magnetic pull’

There's very little evidence of the 'magnetic pull' of our benefits system. But there is evidence which suggests the Prime Minister wants to win back disillusioned Tory voters who've been attracted by UKIP.

There’s very little evidence of the ‘magnetic pull’ of our benefits system. But there is evidence which suggests the Prime Minister wants to win back disillusioned Tory voters who’ve been attracted by UKIP

Another day, another announcement about tightening benefit rules for EU migrants.

Writing in the Telegraph today, David Cameron says the “magnetic pull” of UK benefits needs addressing so that people come to Britain for the right reasons.

Immigration should “put Britain first”, he writes, before setting out plans to ensure that EU migrants will be unable to claim benefits for more than three months unless they have “clear job prospects”.

It should be obvious by now that these sorts of announcements are about politics more than they are about money. It’s about the ongoing attempt to lure back disenchanted right-wingers who have been drawn to UKIP like wasps to a jam jar.

I say that because most migrants from the EU do not come to Britain to sign on, but to work. That isn’t conjecture; it’s what the statistics say. And this is what you would expect – who spends hundreds of pounds on a flight and uproots themselves from their home and family to claim a relatively small amount of money in another country?

But Britain has the ‘most generous welfare system in Europe’, I can hear you say. Well not according to the Economic and Social Research Council’s Centre for Population Change (CPC):

Benefits generousj

There are a number of other EU countries that are just as likely as Britain (if not more so) to exercise a ‘magnetic pull’ on migrants.

EU migrants cannot simply sign on to claim Jobseekers Allowance, either, but must pass a tough Habitual Residence Test set before they can make a claim.

And importantly, Britons are significantly more likely to claim benefits than EU migrants. According to a Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) report from 2011, 6.4 per cent of those claiming working aged benefits were non-UK nationals, meaning British nationals were two-and-a-half times more likely to be claiming working age benefits than non-UK nationals.

UK nationals are more likely to claim benefits than foreign migrants right across the board, as the Guardian reported last year (and as the graph from FullFact demonstrates):

“Of the 2 million net migrants to the UK from the eight eastern European countries that joined the EU in 2004, just 13,000 people have claimed jobseeker’s allowance (JSA). This figure was not disputed by No 10.” – The Guardian, March 26 2013.

Full factj

Last year a European Commission report concluded that there was no evidence of systematic or widespread benefit tourism by EU nationals migrating within the EU, including to the UK.

It’s fitting that Cameron should choose the Telegraph for today’s article. Last year the paper falsely claimed that there were over 600,000 unemployed EU migrants in the UK. However as this DWP report from last year demonstrated, the number of EU migrants claiming Jobseekers Allowance – the main UK unemployment benefit – in February 2013 was 60,100 – a tenth of the number described by the Telegraph as ‘unemployed’.

‘Unemployed’ also doesn’t automatically mean ‘claiming benefits’. A European Commission report from last year found that 84 per cent of non-active EU migrants in the UK were relatives of an economically active EU national, meaning they were almost certainly mainly being provided for by spouses, partners and parents (children over 15 and students are included in the figures).

Last year the Telegraph itself was unable to find a single migrant that had come to the UK with the specific intention of claiming benefits. It could only find those who has previously worked but who had signed on after losing their job. And why shouldn’t they do that? They’ve been paying into the system, after all – and that’s at least partly what the safety net is there for in the first place – to help those who’ve made a contribution when times get tough.

In reality there is very little evidence (none that I can find) of the ‘magnetic pull’ of our benefits system. There is quite a lot of evidence, though, which suggests the Prime Minister wants to win back former Tory voters who’ve been attracted by UKIP.

Follow James Bloodworth on Twitter

40 Responses to “Message to David Cameron: you have no evidence the benefit system acts as a ‘magnetic pull’”

  1. Steven Preece

    I see that even the Telegraph are today reporting that a greater percentage of migrants are in-work than native Britons. Of course they attempt to put their own spin on it by claiming it is evidence that EU migrants are stealing jobs. I see no problem in competition for jobs, regardless of where that competition comes from. It encourages jobseekers to improve their skills if they want to ‘win’. In turn it improves the strength and knowledge of the workforce. Employers want the ‘best person for the job’. They don’t care where the person comes from, apart from a few unscrupulous businesses.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11000624/EU-migrant-employment-rate-outstrips-Britons-say-figures.html

  2. Leon Wolfeson

    Amazing how all immigrants are quantum in the Torygraph mode of thought. At the same time, they’re both non-working benefit scroungers and taking jobs from British people.

    Thing is, the studies are quite clear – the only people’s wages affected by new immigrants are other recent immigrants (5 years and under). Moreover, *that* is an argument for the living wage, not restricting immigration.

    We do have a skills problem, but that’s because – unlike most Western countries – business here is terrible about upskilling their workforce. Probably something, unfortunately, which the government needs to force them to offer to their workforce. (I’d prefer if they just did it, but they are not, so…)

  3. Shaun Mansbridge

    I have seen it myself it is how they choose to live !!!! Because that is The Way They have always lived and what they are accustomed to in there country and i mean no Malice or Disrespect to anyone but that is truly how it is in this country thanks to
    David Cameron AND HIS FUCKING GOONS. I have met and got to know many Polish Czechoslovakians Indians and Pakistanis that have turned brand new flats and houses in RIGHT shit holes selling copper wires from the Walls Hot water Immersion heaters for the copper. some Do work and dam hard to !! but all their wages leave this country and are sent home so they are slowly bleeding this once beautiful stable country bone dry and you cant tell me that is right is it????? I respect any one no matter what their race or color is as long as they respect our British traditions in our country and work positively to help this country PROSPER. NOT BLEED US DRY these people are killing this country i worked dam harm until i lost my eyesight and now to even try and get some sort of help/support ie benefits is fucking impossible because of lazy low life scrounging wankers 🙁 !!!

  4. Carl van Tonder

    Hi — the link to the CPC document is broken (“not found”). Could it please be amended?

  5. Just Visiting

    I’ve no reason to accuse the Guardian of being wrong on that figure, have you?

Comments are closed.