Donna Edmunds, a UKIP councillor and candidate in the European elections, has said that businesses should be able to refuse services to women and gay people. She isn't the first UKIP candidate to court controversy.
Fresh controversy has been sparked after Donna Edmunds, a UKIP councillor in Lewes and a candidate for the party in the European elections, said that businesses should be able to refuse services to women and gay people (she now says she regrets the comments).
Edmunds expressed this opinion in response to a question on whether she supported David Silvester, the UKIP councillor for Henley-on-Thames who claimed that the recent storms and floods were caused by the government’s introduction of gay marriage.
These are just the latest in a long line of gaffes by UKIP candidates and representatives.
Here are some previous examples:
- Godfrey Bloom MEP left UKIP after he described a group of female party members as ‘sluts’ and hit Channel 4 News presenter Michael Crick over the head with a copy of the conference brochure. Before these incidents, Bloom was already in the public spotlight for claiming that the UK should not be sending aid to ‘bongo bongo land’. More recently, he shocked those present at an Oxford Union debate in January by asking a disabled student if he was ‘Richard III’.
- Geoffrey Clarke, a candidate in council elections in Kent, was suspended by the party in December 2012 after calling for an NHS review to look into whether foetuses with Down’s syndrome and spina bifida should be compulsorily aborted.
- Eric Kitson, a UKIP councillor on Worcestershire County Council, resigned in May last year after it was discovered that he had been posting racist and anti-Muslim cartoons on Facebook.
- Chris Pain, a county councillor in Lincolnshire, was removed as leader of the UKIP group in September (and was then removed from the party altogether) after being investigated by the police for allegedly posting racist comments on Facebook.
- Winston McKenzie, a by-election candidate in Croydon North in November 2012, claimed that allowing same-sex couples to adopt children was ‘unhealthy‘.
- Philip Rose, a candidate who said that ‘gay folk’ were ‘being used by forces of evil’ to stop UKIP’s progress.
- Henry Reilly, a councillor in Northern Ireland, claimed that a ‘militant gay lobby’ was trying to impose itself on Christian churches. He also pledged to ‘support Assad’ in a tweet about the situation in Syria in September.
- John Sullivan, a council candidate in Gloucestershire, said that regular physical exercise in schools can ‘prevent homosexuality‘.
- Anna-Marie Crampton, a candidate in council elections in East Sussex, was suspended by the party after making anti-Semitic comments in April last year, in which she claimed that the Jews deliberately organised the Second World War and sacrificed their own people in the Holocaust.
There are also the claims which have been made about the party’s leader Nigel Farage. As the party’s conference started in September last year, an alleged incident was brought to light from 1981 (when Farage was a member of the cadet force at his school, Dulwich College) in which he and others are supposed to have marched around a Sussex village singing Hitler Youth songs.
Channel 4 News also uncovered a letter from around this time, in which a teacher at Dulwich College claimed that Farage held “publicly professed racist and neo-fascist views” and expressed concern that he had been made a prefect.
Considering the phenomenon of the ‘rogue’ UKIP member is seemingly never ending, perhaps the cranks and oddballs are less the exception, but rather the rule.
87 Responses to “UKIP: a history of cranks and oddballs”
Thomas F. Lopez
Their job is promoting UKIP and giving people the facts on the EU.
No I do not own a mobile phone. Do not joke because it’s true. I live on Dartmoor where there’s rarely reception.
I gave their reason. Do you honestly think it’s fair that:
1) We’re in a political and fiscal union we never voted to join?
2) I should think it’s OK that whenever I bring this up, people say “Oh we have MEPs to represent us” as if this makes the lack of democracy in the EU all OK? UKIP may win the Euro elections, many will vote UKIP because its position on the EU is clear, not because they care about voting histories. A UKIP victory should make it perfectly clear, well more perfectly clear than it is already: We want out!
Frankie D.
No, their job is to vote. If they wanted to promote UKIP, they should get a job as a party activist.
Frankie D.
I repeat, do they receive money from the taxpayer? No, you’ve admitted that they don’t. You never actually said if you think they should be banned from using taxpayer funded roads. So much for ukip being a libertarian party…
” I believe they represent more than 70% of the British people.” What on earth are you basing that on? If that was true, why haven’t they got a single mp or managed to poll much above 10%? What mud slinging are you talking about? What stories have the media told about ukip that haven’t been true?
Thomas F. Lopez
Look, I made my argument and it’s clear you don’t like it but I am too tired to keep repeating myself. They are subsidized by the taxpayer. Anyone in the country should be allowed to use taxpayer funded roads.
Call it an educated guess. UKIP’s polling is at this level because:
1) It is a new party and some people take time to switch sides, but eventually will.
2) The media and LibLabCon’s constant pathetic mud-slinging, and the fact that up until recently people believed that bullsh*t.
OK: “What mud slinging are you talking about?” I don’t know why I’m even bothering debating with you.
As for the second question, maybe start with the fact the media keep on referring to UKIP as “far right” which isn’t true at all.
Thomas F. Lopez
They do what WE the UKIP supporters want them to do. If their voters aren’t happy then they’ll vote them out in 2014. I wonder if that will happen…