Last week Lejla Kuric met the former leader of the English Defence League (EDL) Tommy Robinson. This is what she found out.
Last week I met the former leader of the English Defence League (EDL) Tommy Robinson during a meeting held at the offices of the Quilliam Foundation.
I shook his hand and had a friendly conversation. It was a slightly surreal encounter that would have been unthinkable just over a month ago.
On 9 October 2013, in a surprise move, the EDL’s then-leaders Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll resigned from the controversial street protest movement in order to work with Quilliam, a counter-extremism think-tank founded by former members of the Islamist organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir.
This move appears to be the beginning of the end for the EDL and their thuggish street protests as confusion, in-fighting and fragmentation take hold of the movement.
Unsurprisingly, staunch supporters of the dwindling group are angry and feel betrayed.
Surprisingly, this anger is shared by a number of anti-racist groups and many on the liberal left who should – one would have thought – be happy with this turn of the events. In fact, amongst many left-wingers Quilliam were derided as foolish sell-outs, blinded by a desire for money and exposure and consequently duped by Robinson’s cunning.
It is interesting to notice that this narrative is being pushed by the very same people who are often indifferent to Islamist extremism and who are all too willing to turn blind eye to bigotry when it comes from Muslim public personalities.
There are, however, still serious questions and concerns regarding Robinson’s defection from the EDL and the alliance he has forged with Quilliam that need to be dealt with, and the meeting I attended was organised in order to address such concerns.
The meeting began with Robinson explaining how the EDL came about. He asserted that the EDL was initially a response to the extremist organisation Al-Muhajiroun that organised a protest against British armed forces, in which soldiers were insulted and threatened. There was a strong sense of frustration in Luton after this protest since it was felt that nothing was being done about Islamist extremism and that debate was being suffocated by political correctness – “We were gagged” Robinson said.
According to Robinson, he never intended for the EDL to become a racist or anti-Muslim organisation, but the strategy he adopted backfired as anti-extremist rhetoric merged with anti-Muslim rhetoric, thereby attracting racist and neo-fascist elements.
I find this narrative somewhat unconvincing since numerous speakers at these rallies gave blatantly anti-Muslim speeches to rapturous applause, while anti-Muslim chants and comments were commonplace rather than isolated incidents.
When asked why he did not join forces with Muslims fighting Islamic extremism, Robinson said he was not aware of them at the time. His view of Muslims, he affirmed, was distorted by the fact that reactionaries and non-violent Islamists dominated Muslim representation in the media, at interfaith-events and in local government initiatives.
A hijab-clad lady confronted Robinson about anti-Muslim attacks that are increasingly being directed at women like her. Whilst condemning such attacks, Robinson, disappointingly said “Muslim men are also attacking white women”, presumably referring to grooming gangs.
Violence against women should be condemned without the need to make tribal distinction between ‘your’ and ‘our’ women, and Robinson’s use of this argument betrays a reliance on the kind of divisive identity politics he would do well to discard.
Talking about personal cost, Robinson said that he regularly receives violent threats against him and family. At that point I asked Robinson: “While there is no excuse for the threats made to you, don’t you think that it was you who whipped up this level of hostility, where violent threats are commonplace?”. As an example I cited threats he makes in this video clip.
His response was unequivocal. “Yes.” He explained “At the time I thought we need to put pressure on Muslims.”
His straightforward honesty on this issue was commendable.
Could ordinary people – Muslims and non-Muslims – back Tommy Robinson in his stance against Islamist extremism? Yes, but there is a major stumbling block – Robinson’s perceived relationship with anti-Muslim bloggers Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer.
Robinson did state that he had cut ties with both of them but when pushed to condemn them in public, he was reluctant and demanded to see evidence of their bigotry.
I still find many of Robinson’s views troubling to say the least. However his reasons for leaving the EDL are commendable. I also share his fears about the widening chasm between some communities.
What really struck me was the fact Robinson was prepared put aside differences and work with Muslims for the sake of community relations in this country. This is not the attitude of a hateful fascist he is often made out to be.
Yes, he has made some regrettable comments in the past but it is unfair to indefinitely punish him for his past when he is moving in the right direction. It is movement we ought to encourage and support.
The commentators complaining about Robinson’s lack of a ‘Damascene conversion’ are missing the point. He has come a long way from a man threatening ‘every single Muslim’ to the man I watched positively engaging with Muslims.
The fact that the former EDL leader, former Hizb ut-Tahrir members, former Jihadists, Muslims, ex-Muslims and others were sitting at the same table openly debating extremism, the role of religion and culture was extraordinary. I would go as far as to say it was even a historic occasion.
This is precisely the kind cutting edge, anti-extremism work this country really needs and, in that regard, the Qulliam Foundation is leading the way.
36 Responses to “The day I met Tommy Robinson”
dave stone
” he believes in conciliation and in talking and understanding.”
Perhaps you’d like to explain his reluctance to condemn Geller and Spencer? And also explain why Geller why regards his position unchanged from his pre-“damascene conversion” days?
Sure, it would be very comforting to believe Yaxley-Lennon is the new Father Christmas but if he wants to convince he’s going to have to deliver the goods unambiguously.
Dixiemink
Rashida,
Can you prove that Muslims are suffering from a “spike in Islamophobia” – or are you just referring to their anger at the increased criticism of them brought on by constant news of Koran-inspired violent actions and hatespeech against the “kuffar” we are seeing so frequently? That criticism is legitimate and is not evidence of a phobia of Muslims.
Also, if I were you I would be careful with regards to bringing up the Nazi Antisemitism and then leaping to compare the treatment of Jews in WWII to that of Muslims now – or even then, since the Holocaust was in part engineered by the most powerful Muslim figure of the time.
The leader of the Muslim world during WWII was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. He was in fact one of the architects of the Holocaust, helping to devise, encourage and promote it from his perch at the side of Hitler, Himmler, and the Mufti’s own “best friend” Eichmann, during several years in Berlin as Hitler’s VIP guest. I think maybe you should look at the evidence, and then, if you are wise, refrain from mentioning Nazis, antisemitism and Muslim “victimhood” in the same sentence again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haj_Amin_al-Husseini#The_Holocaust
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2010/02/07/The-Mufti-of-Jerusalem–Architect-of-the-Holocaust
Matthew Blott
And the movement he has now left. You berk.
Dixiemink
“explain his reluctance to condemn Geller and Spencer? And also explain
why Geller why regards his position unchanged from his pre-“damascene
conversion” days?”
Condemn them for what, exactly? And I say this as someone who thinks that Geller is a rather too shrill and unsympathetic a character for my personal tastes. Regardless, she often does amazingly good quality research and so I am willing to put up with the unattractive tone in order to read most of her work.
And I think T Robinson has himself made it very clear (see video below, for example) that his position on Muslim extremism and its impact on the UK has not changed a bit – what he says has changed is his view on what is the right way to go about challenging extremism.
Sunday Morning Live BBC News Pts 1 & 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQ4OMOEad4U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_4Ph7M-Clk
dave stone
“Condemn them [Geller and Spencer] for what, exactly?”
Geller and Spencer have both been banned from entering this country. According to anti-extremist campaign group Hope not Hate they are both active in spreading anti-Muslim hatred.
So let’s say: condemn them for spreading anti-Muslim hatred.
http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/2803/geller-and-spencer-banned