Everyone agrees that newspapers play a crucial role in British democracy, even if they disagree what that role is.
Tom London is a London-based writer and blogger
Everyone agrees that newspapers play a crucial role in British democracy, even if they disagree what that role is.
This week the Press Gazette published the results of the National Readership Survey. I have used these results – for both print and online – to draw up tables with readerships and information about owners and political orientation. Almost 78 per cent of our press is owned by a handful of mostly foreign-based billionaires.
Our newspapers like to paint their own role as heroic – they are the brave defenders of democracy who hold our elected representatives to account. Watergate is the archetype of this kind of journalism and it does occur now and again in the UK but it is rare.
Too often, far from protecting our democracy, our papers subvert it. In his Inquiry, Lord Leveson quoted some lines from Tom Stoppard’s Night and Day. Milne: “No matter how imperfect things are, if you’ve got a free press everything is correctable, and without it everything is concealable.” Ruth: “I’m with you on the free press. It’s the newspapers I can’t stand.”
In a free press, the nature of the newspapers matter very much.
The nature of a paper is set by its owner. Press barons wield far more power and influence than all but a very few MPs and have, unsurprisingly, used it to further their own interests.
Since 2010, the barons have pushed the highly contentious argument that there is no alternative to austerity (for other people, not for them or those close to them), and have largely ignored the stories which historians will doubtless note – the widening social divisions and the swelling numbers at food banks, the 21st century’s soup kitchens.
Newspapers exercise power and influence in a number of ways. It is not just that they have a megaphone which lets them dominate the public debate. They also have privileged access to politicians. And one of their most powerful forms of influence is the ability to effectively set the political agenda for the other media and more widely, in parliament, the workplace, the kitchen and the pub.
In the terms of political theory, the press barons impose the elite’s cultural hegemony. As Martin Kettle has argued, the answer to the old 1970’s question – ‘Who governs Britain?’ – is now, in important respects, the press barons. The most recent example of their power – and arrogance – is how they have contemptuously ignored the Leveson Inquiry findings and the subsequent decision of the elected House of Commons.
Newspapers put great store by the concept of editorial independence. Sometimes, it is a reality. The Lebedevs, for example, own papers – the Independent and the Evening Standard – which take markedly different political stances.
Too often, however, editorial independence is a sham. Proprietors choose editors who they know share their views. Editors know well what is expected of them without the need for a proprietor to actively interfere.
Rupert Murdoch’s candour at the Leveson Inquiry was revealing. He said that if someone wanted to know his opinion on a subject they should just read the leader in the Sun.
UK press weekly print and on-line readership (for papers over 1 million) in March 2013
|
Newspaper(s)
|
Combined print and online readership
(In brackets print alone)
|
Effective owner/s
|
Information about effective owner/s
|
Political orientation of newspaper/s
|
% of combined print and online (Print alone)
|
|
The Sun/The Sun on Sunday
|
13,674,000
(12,765,000)
|
Rupert Murdoch
|
Billionaire. Lives in US.
|
Supported Tories in 2010
|
18.6%
(20.7%)
|
|
The Mail/ Mail on Sunday
|
12,188,000
(9,534,000)
|
Lord Rothermere
|
Billionaire. Lives in France.
Non-domiciled for UK tax |
Supported Tories in 2010
|
16.5%
(15.5%)
|
|
Metro
|
7,986,000
(7,597,000)
|
Lord Rothermere
|
Billionaire. Lives in France.
Non-domiciled for UK tax |
Supported Tories in 2010
|
10.8%
(12.3%)
|
|
Mirror/Sunday Mirror/ People
|
7,874,000
(7,063,000)
|
Trinity Mirror plc
|
Public Limited Company
|
Supported Labour in 2010
|
10.7%
(11.4%)
|
|
The Guardian/The Observer
|
5,342,000
(2,898,000)
|
Scott Trust Ltd
|
Supported Lib Dems in 2010
|
7.3%
(4.7%)
|
|
|
Telegraph/ Sunday Telegraph
|
4,998,000
(3,128,000)
|
David and Frederick Barclay
|
Billionaires. Live on private island near Sark.
|
Supported Tories in 2010
|
6.8%
(5.1%)
|
|
The Times/ Sunday Times
|
4,608,000
(4,418,000)
|
Rupert Murdoch
|
Billionaire. Lives in US.
Alleged tax avoider.
|
Supported Tories in 2010
|
6.3%
(7.2%)
|
|
The Independent/ i/Independent on Sunday
|
4,002,000
(2,770,000)
|
Alexander (father)and Evgeny (son) Lebedev
|
Alexander is a billionaire, ex-KGB and lives in Russia. Evgeny lives in the UK
|
Supported anti-Tory tactical voting in 2010
|
5.4%
(4.5%)
|
|
London Evening Standard
|
3,850,000
(3,443,000)
|
Alexander and Evgeny Lebedev
|
Alexander is billionaire, ex-KGB and lives in Russia. Evgeny lives in UK
|
Supported Tories in 2010
|
5.2%
(5.6%)
|
|
Daily Express/Sunday Express
|
3,118,000
(2,756,000)
|
Richard Desmond
|
Billionaire pornographer.
|
Supported Tories in 2010
|
4.2%
(4.5%)
|
|
Daily Star/Daily Star Sunday
|
2,972,000
(2,873,000)
|
Richard Desmond
|
Billionaire pornographer.
Alleged tax avoider.
|
Supported Tories in 2010
|
4.0%
(4.7%)
|
|
Daily Record/ Sunday Mail
|
1,719,000
(1,527,000)
|
Trinity Mirror plc
|
Public limited company
|
Supported Labour in 2010
|
2.3%
(2.5%)
|
|
Financial Times
|
1,339,000
(928,000)
|
Pearson plc
|
Public limited company
|
Supported Tories in 2010
|
1.8%
(1.5%)
|
|
TOTALS
|
73,670,000
(61,700,000)
|
|
Effective owner(s)
|
% of combined print and online (print alone)
|
|
Lord Rothermere
|
27.3 (27.8)
|
|
Rupert Murdoch
|
24.9 (27.9)
|
|
Trinity Mirror plc
|
13.0 (13.9)
|
|
Alexander and Evgeny Lebedev
|
10.6 (10.1)
|
|
Richard Desmond
|
8.2 (9.2)
|
|
Scott Trust
|
7.3 (4.7)
|
|
David and Frederick Barclay
|
6.8 (5.1)
|
|
Pearson plc
|
1.8 (1.5)
|
Over a quarter (27.3 per cent) of the press is owned by Lord Rothermere and 24.9 per cent by Rupert Murdoch – between them these two men have over 50 per cent of the printed press.
Over three quarters (77.8 per cent) of the press is owned by a handful of billionaires. There are only 88 billionaires among the 63 million people in the UK and most of the barons do not even live in the UK.
I am no fan of Michael Gove’s fact-based curriculum, but it is true that knowing certain facts is key to understanding. All students of British politics need to know who owns our press.
37 Responses to “Everyone should know who owns the press – for the sake of our democracy”
Di
we could take their power away by simply not buying their papers
James Waldie
Only Read “The National” and “The Morning Star” why should we waste money on papers that tell nothing but lies would rather spend my money on a guid cup of tea and a blether at least you would get 95% truth than a 100% lies
Adrian Wilkins
Are these actually fair assessments of BBC bias, or just a couple of useful soundbites that support the point of view of right wingers though?
If anything, the BBC have demonstrated a bias in favour of the Coalition and Conservative government recently – vast amounts of left-wing public protest has gone virtually unreported.
This mornings BBC News front page was mostly occupied with a full-width banner of an RAF Tornado. Really unsupportive of the government agenda, no?
British people think their media is one of the most right-wing in Europe — and they’re probably right – Ryan Curran
[…] Foot Forward’, a left-wing blog, released a post in 2013 demonstrating the scale of the problem facing the media when it comes to bias. According to their […]
Why did we pray for Paris when other tragedies receive barely a second thought? | RATTLING OF A STICK
[…] are laughable. But unfortunately, the collective readership for these papers is upwards of 30 million – the scariest factor being that they are controlled by Conservative supporters who benefit […]