Anyone opposed to this shameful collusion with the hardline anti-immigration right should write to the Labour Party figures in question, or to their constituency parties, and make their feelings clear.
The right-wing pundit Douglas Murray recently wrote:
“To study the results of the latest census is to stare at one unalterable conclusion: mass immigration has altered our country completely. It has become a radically different place, and London has become a foreign country. In 23 of London’s 33 boroughs ‘white Britons’ are now in a minority…
“We long ago reached the point where the only thing white Britons can do is to remain silent about the change in their country. Ignored for a generation, they are expected to get on, silently but happily, with abolishing themselves, accepting the knocks and respecting the loss of their country. ‘Get over it. It’s nothing new. You’re terrible. You’re nothing’.
For what it is worth, it seems to me that the vindictiveness with which the concerns of white British people, and the white working and middle class in particular, have been met by politicians and pundits alike is a phenomenon in need of serious and swift attention.”
Such words, one might expect, should place their author beyond the pale of respectable political opinion, in the sole company of UKIP and the rest of the fringe anti-immigration right.
Instead, he is at the heart of a political outfit that is itself at the heart of Westminster politics. Murray is associate director of the Henry Jackson Society (HJS), a ‘think-tank’ that, despite being extremely right-wing and predominantly Tory in its loyalties, nevertheless enjoys a following among all three principal British parliamentary parties.
The HJS’s ‘Advisory Council‘ includes not only 28 Tory MPs, but also two Liberal Democrat and eleven Labour MPs. The Labour MPS are:
Margaret Beckett MP, former secretary of state for foreign and commonwealth affairs
Hazel Blears MP, former secretary of state for communities and local government
Ben Bradshaw MP, former secretary of state for culture, media and sport
Chris Bryant MP, former parliamentary under secretary of state, foreign and commonwealth office
Dai Havard MP
Khalid Mahmood MP
Meg Munn MP, former parliamentary under secretary of state, foreign and commonwealth office
Jim Murphy MP, shadow secretary of state for defence
John Spellar MP, shadow minister for foreign and commonwealth office
Gisela Stuart MP
Derek Twigg MP, former parliamentary under secretary of state for the ministry of defence
Indeed, Labour’s shadow secretary for defence, Jim Murphy, in February of this year, gave a major speech on policy at an event organised by the HJS.
Murray did not write his article in a purely personal capacity; it appeared in the magazine Standpoint with an attached biography giving his HJS affiliation.
Murray’s views are scarcely uncharacteristic of the organisation’s. His boss, HJS executive director, Alan Mendoza, expressed similar views at a speech given around the same time (March 2013) at the conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Mendoza attacked the EU for what he considered to be its hostility to Israel, in the following terms (as reported by the Washington Jewish Week‘s Suzanne Pollak):
“Immigration is also a reason for rising anti-Israel feelings [in Europe]. In 1998, 3.2 percent of Spain was foreign-born. In 2007, that percent had jumped to 13.4 percent, Mendoza said. In cities such as London, Paris and Copenhagen, 10 percent of residents are Muslim.”
“The European Muslim population has doubled in the past 30 years and is predicted to double again by 2040.
“For all the benefits that immigration has brought, it has been difficult for European countries to absorb immigrants into their society given their failure to integrate newcomers. Regardless of their political views, Muslims in Europe will likely speak out against Israel whenever any Middle Eastern news breaks, just as they will against India in the Kashmir dispute. Their voices are heard well above the average Europeans, who tend not to speak out Mendoza said, adding that the Muslim immigrants do this with full knowledge that they would not be allowed to speak out like that in many Middle Eastern countries.’
In other words, the HJS’s leaders claim that London has become a “foreign country” because “white Britons” are in a minority in 23 of its 33 boroughs; that “white Britons” have “lost their country” and are in the process of “abolishing themselves” because of the increase in the size of the non-white and immigrant population; that the increasing European Muslim population is to blame for Europe’s “anti-Israel feelings”; and that the voices of Muslims “are heard well above the average Europeans”.
Yet instead of the HJS being ostracised by respectable political opinion, senior members of the shadow cabinet and Labour parliamentary party are endorsing and participating in it.
Anyone opposed to this shameful collusion with the hardline anti-immigration right should write to the Labour Party figures in question, or to their constituency parties, and make their feelings clear.
Marko Attila Hoare is a former senior member of the Henry Jackson Society (Greater Europe co-director, then European neighbourhood section director, 2005-2012)
74 Responses to “Labour’s shameful links with the anti-immigration right”
Marijana
I would think that the HJS would be the perfect place for David Lindsay. He is, after all, an apologist for the Chetnik movement during World War 2, who collaborated with the Nazis and carried out genocide against Croats and Muslims.
David Lindsay
You are confusing me with your own support for the Ustashe and for its proud revivalist, Franjo Tudjman. To be fair, Tudjman was merely a Holocaust-denier. Unlike Alijia Izetbegovic, he had not been a participant in the Holocaust. If ever there were an Islamo-Facist, properly so called, then it was he. Backed up to the hilt, like Tudjman, by those who have since become the HJS.
Marko Attila Hoare
I attended a pretty rough inner-city London comprehensive school, at which more than fifty different languages were spoken by the children, and where eventually a majority of the children didn’t speak English as a first language. I grew up in the Ladbroke Grove area of London where a very large proportion of the population was black or otherwise non-white (Arab, South Asian, etc.). So ‘someone with experience of what it might be like to live as a white person in those areas of London where English is one of 300 languages spoken in schools, or someone with any understanding of what it might be like to grow up as a minority white child in those areas’ describes me almost exactly.
SarahAB
I have read it, and had in any case already read some of MAH’s earlier material on the HJS. If the piece you linked to had confined itself to offering an evidenced rebuttal of the implied or direct criticisms of the society made by Marko and others, that would have been ok, and one would just have to weigh up both sides of the argument.
But it opens with an extended and astonishingly petty ad hominem attack on MAH – eg saying he can’t publish elsewhere except on his blog when he is an academic who has published several books and articles. I didn’t think the more substantive points in the second half of the response to MAH were fully satisfactory – for example, the point about Israel implied that MAH is criticising the HJS for being pro-Israel from a knee jerk anti-Israel position (by contrast with just being normally critical of some of the country’s policies, in the same way one might be critical of any country), which I don’t believe to be the case.
Do you think MAH was reasonable to express some misgivings about Douglas Murray (when he first became associated with the HJS) and about that recent article in particular? Sometimes I find myself in agreement with Douglas Murray, but I also didn’t like the Standpoint piece. One can discuss the impact or pace of immigration, and also of conservative or extremist Muslim groups, but I find his way of doing so unwelcome sometimes. Many immigrants are white – and one reason there are fewer white people is because of intermarriage – my non white relatives, DM contrives to imply, are somehow part of a threat to my way of life.
Cole
And the Right attracts people with experience of real life? Like Cameron, Osborne, Johnson, Farage…