Social media martyrdom: lessons from the Paris Brown debacle

Yesterday Paris Brown, the country's first Youth Crime Commissioner, resigned from her post thanks to the Mail's digging up of ill-advised tweets she posted several years ago. A sad, but perhaps inevitable end to what was the opportunity of a lifetime for the young teenager from Kent.

Joe Jones is a writer and blogger from Nottingham

The Daily Mail can now add the character assassination of a seventeen year old girl to its long list of achievements.

Yesterday Paris Brown, the country’s first Youth Crime Commissioner, resigned from her post thanks to the Mail’s digging up of ill-advised tweets she posted several years ago. A sad, but perhaps inevitable end to what was the opportunity of a lifetime for the young teenager from Kent.

Clearly the Daily Mail’s comments about Paris being a “racist” and a “homophobe” and guilty of “hate speech” have sunk into the consciousness of many of those who haven’t taken the time to properly analyse the offending tweets for themselves – who would have found, at worst, misadvised, immature posts and inappropriate words straight from the mind of a silly, careless teenage girl who could not possibly have known at the time what the future had in store for her.

There is a video on satirical news site The Onion which discusses how, by 2040, every presidential candidate in the United States will be unelectable due to embarrassing Facebook posts from their past.

Though a parody, something similar has happened to Paris – immature and embarrassing tweets from her past – in this case her childhood – have caused her to lose office just days into her appointment.

Crucially, though, lessons need to be learnt from this whole affair to ensure that it doesn’t happen again. Kent Police’s procedures should have included the vetting of all the candidates’ social profiles to ensure that any candidate thrust into the limelight cannot be demonised at a later date as Paris has been.

Ann Barnes, the police and crime commissioner for Kent, stated: “We used Kent Police’s vetting procedures, which do not normally involve scrutiny of social networks for this grade of post.”

This needs to change immediately, to avoid giving predatory media outlets easy ammunition with which to destroy the reputation of anyone who enters the public arena.

As it stands, Paris Brown has had her reputation dragged through the dirt because of things she wrote when she was between the ages of 14 and 16. She’s sacrificed the role of a lifetime due to the untenability of her position, and Kent Police has been left embarrassed because the whole affair was allowed to happen in the first place.

Paris herself said: “I hope this may stand as a learning experience for many other young people.”

In today’s society, in which online conduct is just as important as real-life conduct, teenagers all over the country would be wise to listen to her words, because as Britain’s first high-profile social media martyr, she knows all too well what it’s like to have your real-life reputation of today destroyed by your online personality of the past.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

35 Responses to “Social media martyrdom: lessons from the Paris Brown debacle”

  1. Georgio

    All of the tweets were sent within the last six month, when Paris Brown was 16. If you’re going to defend casual racism and homophobia in such a sensationalist manner, don’t distort the truth.

  2. Mr. Sensible

    Maybe something needed doing about the recruitment procedure in this case. However, in my opinion, the basic lesson from this case is this: You are not invisible on social media, and I think some people think they are. Embarrassing is one thing, but if she had said some of what she had said on the street then I expect she would get at least a talking to from the police. I think the police are right to investigate this; just because you say something like that in a so called silly tweet, doesn’t mean it doesn’t have the same impact as if you say it on the street. If anything, it’s worse on social media. The sooner people to behave on social media as they would on the street, the better.

  3. Tony G

    I fear you might be missing out on the significance of the CPS examining the tweets for ‘criminality’. ‘Casual racism and homophobia’ is usually inappropriate but it should never be criminal. That gives the sting to the media witch-hunt. It has the obvious backing of the state.

  4. Tony G

    Great, you are in favour of people getting a “talking to” by the police because of the views they express, and arrested if they don’t show correct contrition? I don’t think thats very sensible and gives far too much power to the police.

  5. Dango jango

    Disagree here, to be honest. For me, the right thing to do would’ve been for them to come out and defend her. By simply stating that they’ve read the posts, don’t have a problem and have given Paris a chance to explain her comments, they would’ve put this to bed very quickly and helped people to realise that the world is changing and that Facebook, twitter etc are now a part of our lives, part of who we are and are publically accessible. Vetting her Facebook simply leads down a shady route that hides information or shows a lack of trust of Paris, not the best way to establish a working relationship.

Comments are closed.